WRX - Steve Morgan - roulettesystem

[Post]

flat betting or use progression ? and so if you have 1-3-2-3-1-3-2- were to bet and the 8 bet ?

[schoenpoetser]

I have programed this system in excel.I did it with the SSB-principle and a Martingale betting schedule.It is not a HG but it looks very profitable.In the past I have posted a diagram of the profit.

[Post]

Still dont understand sorry but at the fourth bet you bet collums 1 and 2 because of the 3  but on the eight bet you also bet the 1 and 2 because of the 3 whats the difference then you said the opposite ?

[schoenpoetser]

In my model I use this betting schedule. 0-1-3-9 .I use the SSB principle .Then you have the possibility to play continuous.It is a part of my strategy on internet.

[birdhands]

What is the SSB principle?

[schoenpoetser]

SSB is  my ShoeShineBoy  method. With this principle is it possible to wager continuous on random rows  you expect they will not repeat. This principle is special suitable for the outside chances.

[schoenpoetser]

This is an example for SSB and dozens.

[darrynf]

i read this thread, i didnt know steve was a kiwi (im kiwi too), the system sounds good if you use it correctly, i never looked at it like that, waiting for a pattern and betting against it.

i play roulette online and not sure if this method would work, before you say anything rng is different to a land base casino in my opion.

I have my own system and it is early days but out of 8 sessions i havent loss meaning i have a made a profit.

I dont know steve but i thought he was the one who uses vb techniques.
I would try that system out (online) and see what happens but a dozen can win more then 5x and it dosent take that long for it to happen (at least once out of 100 spins), i like the concept as i use a patern base as well for my system but i cant apply this method to my system (meaning i cant bet against the pattern).

when i have spare cash i will give this method ago.

[VLS]

I dont know Steve but I thought he was the one who uses vb techniques.

Hello Darryn,

Mr Morgan doesn't apply Visual Ballistics as far as I know.

Long time without seeing him!

Regards.

[iggiv]

this is another Steve (this forum owner) , which is VB guru. as for Steve Morgan's double dozen system, we ran a test in RX in new Victor's forum and it did not hold on a long run. Maybe Steve is or was lucky with his system. Honestly i don't believe those dozen and double dozen stuff on a long run.

[darrynf]

i thought he created a computer that tracks and is a vb monitor or something, thats the same guy who owns this site isnt he?

genuin winning system or something?

[iggiv]

yes

[iggiv]

@iggiv

You ran a test on his claim that three losses will result in a win on the fourth bet in 18 out of 20 cases?  Because I've tested a few thousand spins now and it has held up.  In addition, I've never seen more than 4 losses in a row so far.  It's important to differentiate between WWLL LLWW (two separate but consecutive groups of four) and LLLL.  I only bet on consecutive groups if the first one is LLLL (because the second will be an immediate repeat of the first and is basically the same group).

Sam

Sam, go to

nolinks://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/morgan-one-a-two-dozenhour-system/

[darrynf]

why dosent he use vb, why is he using a different method and selling something else.

so you wait till the pattern hits 3 times in a row for an example, 1232,1232,1232 then bet it will be a 2or 3.

is that how i read that pattern for the dozens?

that could take an extremly long time if it happen at all on that day

[birdhands]

Thanks iggiv for the link.  I checked it and that thread is talking about an altogether different system.

Sam

[birdhands]

-