sherminator's grind.

[sherminator]

Well, I did say it was a grind  

500 spins and 80 units profit later.

In between spins 300 and 400, I had to go to 5 units in the progression.

Looking at the charts kind of confirms my suspicions about a lot of things regarding roulette, but that is for another day.

[sherminator]

To be fair Spike, it only looks like that because that is just 500 spins.

The starting point was 500.
The lowest point was 450.
The highest point was 580.

So I would not classify that as a rollercoaster as such, but I understand where you are coming from. 

[Spike!]

LOL, you're right. I didn't see the spin amount, all  saw was another of Turbo's 3000 spin tests.

[sherminator]

They were proper tests 
My gut tells me this is dead in the water anyhow for a number of reasons.
Flat betting at the right time will take advantage of a lot of the good win streaks that were evident in the charts.

[keel44]

This screams Positive Progression.  How about for every 5 wins in a row..... double up?  You could make this work with a little tweaking.  As of now it is extremely safe, but you get nowhere

[ludo8400]

try this excel file for bet selection

ludo8400

[Bayes]

Hi Sherminator,

I've sent you a PM.

[sherminator]

@keel,

In my opinion, using a positive progression would not be ideal for this grind.

Imagine winning 5 bets x 2 units = 10. you now double up and are risking 20 units, where do you go from here on a loss. You would then be in effect - 10 for the last 6 spins.

The best way seems to be where you grind out 20 units or so and hit the road. Otherwise you get into a kind of yoyo game where you are just exposing your capital.

Thank you Ludo, I will take a look.

[sherminator]

Here is an example of a short game.

This one took 42 spins to reach a profit of 20 units. I have had 11 consecutive winners. Now for me this would be the ideal time to get out on an upswing before it returns to the yoyo effect.

I had to dip into a 2 unit progression twice on this run.

[sherminator]

I took the short game above through to the hundred spin mark.
It did in fact take a small dip after spin 42 but I never had to go into progression mode for the remainder of these 100 spins.

[sherminator]

Here I am now at the 300 spin mark on this particular run.

[MATTJONO]

Thanks for sharing the system sherminator.

just seeing if the below example is correct

22   W
29   W
---------
   20   W
24   W
   35   L
29   
   12   W
33   W
   10   W
23   W
   11   W
32   W
    3   W
11   W
----------
   16   W
21   W
   21   L
36   
   11   
 9   W
   20   W
34   L
    4   
36   L
    1   
29   W
   15   W
19   W
----------
   27   W
26   L
    8
32   W
   30   W
 5   W
   26   W
18   W
   33   W
27   W
    0   L
 8   
   17   W
 5   W
   35   L
 9
   19   W
----------
15   W
   10   W
26   W
   10   W
 2   W
   29   W
 5   W
    9   W
24   W
   34   L
26
    6   W
19   W
   32   W
----------
23   W
   33   W
13   W
   18   W
14   W
   15   L

[sherminator]

correct Matt mate 

(400 spin results)

[Bayes]

The problem with "odds on" systems is that the appearance of the zero tends to wipe them out, but it might do ok on Betvoyager's no-zero wheel. It looks pretty good so far.

My gut tells me this is dead in the water anyhow for a number of reasons.

Why do you say that? (apart from the the maths, which applies to all systems.  )

[MATTJONO]

i think this could have some long runs. 20spins + on a regualer basis.
whats the longest run you have seen sherminator?

its just like you said its a Grinder system and I believe would need alot of patience...until the upswing occours.

cheers
MATTJONO

[MATTJONO]

-