Clothdog's Root system----- Google way

[hideseek]

Still testing. I am not sure how to [attach=#]post the BBT chart here. Chart says "target roulette" actually it is not. I am testing a variation of CD's root system. I will post it soon.
[attach=#]

[hideseek]

Still testing

[hideseek]

Here is the variation:

If any root repeats within 4 spins, play all that root #s for 8 spins with flat bet. If no hit you can double your bet & go upto 16th spin. Stoploss is 16th spin. Last week I won $1000 from a BR of 200!
Test it before playing with real money. Good for RNG also.
Can anybody  code this for RX?
Thanks
HS

[hamsup_sotong]

hey hs, does the 16 spins apply for all roots? if not more spins for root 7-9?

cheers
Hams

[hideseek]

Its for all roots. Some time the dragdown will be much more than 36 spins. So I decided to put a stoploss at 16th spin.

[spiker21]

Can you clarify exactly what you play hideseek. Thanks.

[hideseek]

Hi Spike,
            Waite for a digital root to repeat 2 times within 4 spins. Play that digital root.
For eg:
Spin                   Root
24      6
32      5------------>
28      1
32      5------------> Repeats start betting on 5,14,23 & 32
15      6
9      9
33      6
33      6
29      2
23      5---------------> win

etc.
Drwback of this method is sometime that particular digital root sleeps more than 24 spins!

[Clothdog]

my original way is still the best way to play the method.
cd

[eightfour]

What am I doing wrong? Am I on a bad streak or do I just play it wrong?



N#  Gr    Action
0   0   
36   9   
9   9   
30   3   Bet on 7-8
31   4   loss rebet
2   2   loss rebet
18   9   loss rebet
6   6   loss rebet
12   3   loss give up
23   5   Bet 8 on 4-6
23   5   loss rebet
10   1   loss rebet
14   5   loss rebet
20   2   loss rebet
19   1   loss give up bet 2-3
18   9   loss rebet
16   7   loss rebet
8   8   loss rebet
6   6   loss rebet
15   6   loss gu

[Gavioli]

What am I doing wrong? Am I on a bad streak or do I just play it wrong?



N#  Gr    Action
0   0   
36   9   
9   9   
30   3   Bet on 7-8
31   4   loss rebet
2   2   loss rebet
18   9   loss rebet
6   6   loss rebet
12   3   loss give up
23   5   Bet 8 on 4-6
23   5   loss rebet
10   1   loss rebet
14   5   loss rebet
20   2   loss rebet
19   1   loss give up bet 2-3
18   9   loss rebet
16   7   loss rebet
8   8   loss rebet
6   6   loss rebet
15   6   loss gu

You re doing it wrong. It is like these:

N#  Gr    Action
0   0
------------   
36   9   
9   9
-------------bet 9   
30   3   L
31   4   L
2   2   L
18   9   W
6   6   
12   3
----------   
23   5   
23   5
---------- bet 5   
10   1      L
14   5      W
20   2   
19   1
----------bet 1   
18   9   L
16   7   L
8   8   L
6   6   L
15   6   L

In the end it will lose anyway. There are better methods to play figures.

AG

[eightfour]

Very confused.

Isn't that oposite of what CD explained? Weren't you supposed to bet on the two groups in the root group that didn't appear last?

Eightfour

[InfinitySquared]

Very confused.

Isn't that oposite of what CD explained? Weren't you supposed to bet on the two groups in the root group that didn't appear last?

Eightfour

I think that's right. You wait until a root has appeared twice within 3 spins. Then you bet on the other 2 roots in that root group for 4 spins. If a root or a number repeats you bet all three root groups.

Here's how I would have played it:


ROOT   ROOT GROUP         
            
1   1   10   19   28
2   2   11   20   29
3   3   12   21   30
            
4   4   13   22   31
6   6   15   24   33
9   9   18   27   36
            
5   5   14   23   32
7   7   16   25   34
8   8   17   26   35


N#  Root  Root Group   Action
0      0       (123) 
36    9       (469)
9      9       (469) < Root repeater - Bet all three root groups (469) for four spins.
30    3       (123)           L   
31    4       (469)          W (469 appeared again, root 4 has just hit so we bet on roots 6 & 9)
2     2        (123)          L  (We could start betting on the 123 roots but I'd stick with the 469 root for the next 3 spins)
18    9       (469)          W (1 spin between the 469 roots again, I'd play them again. The numbers seem hot. This time we leave out the 9 root since it just hit. We are betting on 4 & 6.)
6     6        (469)         W - start over.
12    3   
23    5        (578)
23    5        (578) < Root repeater - Bet all three root groups (578) for four spins.
10    1        (123)         L
14    5        (578)        W (578 appeared again, root 5 has just hit so we bet on roots 7 & 8
20    2        (123)         L  (We could start betting on the 123 roots but I'd stick with the 578 root for the next 3 spins)
19    1        (123)         L  (I would have won if I'd swiched, but both groups are hot so it's hard to make a choice. You could always play both at the same time).
18    9        (469)       
16    7        (578)        W
8     8   
6     6         (469)
15   6         (469) < Root repeater - Bet all three root groups (469) for four spins.

[eightfour]

Thank you InfinitySquared.

That clarified a lot for me. I still can't get to win consistently with this system. It goes very much up and down and sometimes evens out. I guess you need a lot of luck for this if I haven't missed something essential.

I'm not that good in using the hot zones. Sometimes it's hard to choose. If I bet 3 groups at once, is it recommended to spin it for 3 or 4 times if no hit?

Eightfour

[hideseek]

Hi 84 & others,
        No system is there which can beat roulette consistently. All you can do is have some fun and try to break even!CD's root group is sofar the best group to experiment(to my liking ofcourse). Goahead experiment with it and keep posting here. We all love to see your experiments also.

So far I hve completed 3 experiments with limited success. One posted on the first page, which gave me ~ $700. The 2nd is to play only 4 #s, which gave me ~ 1000. The 3rd I will post it soon with a BR chart.

Good luck

[InfinitySquared]

Now this time I need some help. 

When I've been playing I have always (perhaps wrongly?) assumed that I can only bet on a root/root group if; there is one spin between the numbers, or, the numbers are root repeaters.

Like this:

8<
13
7< Both are from the 578 group, with one spin between them so I can bet on roots 5 & 8.

18
5 <
5 < Root repeater, bet all three roots (578).


Here are some actuals from Dublin Bet:

#   Root   Root Group

8   8   578 <
25   7   578 < Same root group, not root repeaters.
21   3   123 <
1   1   123 < Same root group, not root repeaters.
9   9   469
7   7   578 <
35   8   578 < Same root group, not root repeaters.
20   2   123

Could I bet on 578/123 or is that against the rules?

With the assumption that I couldn't bet these numbers, that meant I couldn't bet for at least those 8 spins.

After this, when I resumed betting, I encountered 8 losses in a row.

Has anyone else noticed that, if you have a period where you can't make any bets, you then experience lots of losses? I'm just trying to work out a point where it would be good to walk away and return later.

[InfinitySquared]

-