Matyika/Mr.Oops => X.Y.Z. Formula for Winning

[VLSroulette]

1st message, referred below:

1. Register "X" hits.
2. Chose "Y" Numbers.
3. Play them "Z" times.
4. Play always "masse egale".
5. Stop at a winner.

If you apply this, you are on the winning way.
It needs only some education, statistic, mathematic, discipline and iron will.
And last but not least: paper and pencil !!



Well, as I can see, nobody is here to pick up the basic form ("xyz") of the possibility of winning on roulette.

1. Read the first message at this topic.
2. Interpretation:
A: register always up to 75 spins ("X"), but never more !!
B: play the first number ("Y") which had show up 5 times.
C: play this number ("Z")13 times "masse egale".
D: If during the play a second number("Y") turns up 5 x, play ("Z")it
too to 13 times.
E: Stop at any winner, but put 2 chips on the winning number 1x.
Independetly of this last bet win or loose, the Party is finished.
F: You start here a new party. Simply cross out every number of your
register showing 5 and 4 appearances.
As easy as 1 x 1.

Last results: 100 parties on "Playtech" Casino with 50 Euro bankroll:
( 0.10 Chips) 24 party lost 26 chips = -624 76 Party won 1748 chips = + 1124.

I think "Nathan der Weise" would say: "it smells like winning" ?!?!



Bliss said:

It's too hard. Can we start off with A,B,C?

matyika, is this a hot number system? Mr oops did a test on this kind of system, it took more than 50 hours of continuous computer processing.

nolinks://xerxx.se/oops/tester/recnbet1.html

Matyka said:

To Bliss:
I am very happy to see here somebody knowing and reading my old friend Mr.Oops. We had work together for years until he left us a few years ago.
We constructed the "XYZ" strategy - total tested well over 2000000 spins and he just finished an other test over 650000 spins. He was just able to send me a very short message about the result: well over 10% winnings
above the used bankroll/party. He left us about 10 days later.
Ps: it is not a "hot # method".



Hope this is useful.

Credit: Matyika/Mr.Oops

[VLSroulette]

By the way: "masse egale" = FLAT BETTING.

Regards,
Victor

[JLP]

1st message, referred below:

1. Register "X" hits.
2. Chose "Y" Numbers.
3. Play them "Z" times.
4. Play always "masse egale".
5. Stop at a winner.

If you apply this, you are on the winning way.
It needs only some education, statistic, mathematic, discipline and iron will.
And last but not least: paper and pencil !!



Well, as I can see, nobody is here to pick up the basic form ("xyz") of the possibility of winning on roulette.

1. Read the first message at this topic.
2. Interpretation:
A: register always up to 75 spins ("X"), but never more !!
B: play the first number ("Y") which had show up 5 times.
C: play this number ("Z")13 times "masse egale".
D: If during the play a second number("Y") turns up 5 x, play ("Z")it
too to 13 times.
E: Stop at any winner, but put 2 chips on the winning number 1x.
Here the play is for only 1 spin on that number that have hit with 2 chips or for 13 spins???
Independetly of this last bet win or loose, the Party is finished.
F: You start here a new party. Simply cross out every number of your
register showing 5 and 4 appearances.
As easy as 1 x 1.

Last results: 100 parties on "Playtech" Casino with 50 Euro bankroll:
( 0.10 Chips) 24 party lost 26 chips = -624 76 Party won 1748 chips = + 1124.

I think "Nathan der Weise" would say: "it smells like winning" ?!?!



Bliss said:

It's too hard. Can we start off with A,B,C?

matyika, is this a hot number system? Mr oops did a test on this kind of system, it took more than 50 hours of continuous computer processing.

nolinks://xerxx.se/oops/tester/recnbet1.html

Matyka said:

To Bliss:
I am very happy to see here somebody knowing and reading my old friend Mr.Oops. We had work together for years until he left us a few years ago.
We constructed the "XYZ" strategy - total tested well over 2000000 spins and he just finished an other test over 650000 spins. He was just able to send me a very short message about the result: well over 10% winnings
above the used bankroll/party. He left us about 10 days later.
Ps: it is not a "hot # method".



Hope this is useful.

Credit: Matyika/Mr.Oops

Hi Victor,

This is something similar or at least have some point in common to Victory´s Master Sequences or Roulette Warfare - that uses a combination of methods.
One of the points take in count the following : ---> Looks for the 5th repetition.

A)Wheel Bias :

-Record 80 spins.
-Note the numbers that have appeared 4 or more times.
-Bet them for 30 spins with 1 unit on each (flat betting).
-So is betting from 80 to 110 spins.

Cheers,
JLP.-

[kompressor]

we bet 1 unit on all numbers who appears 5 times  in a 75 spins session...for 13 spins.....and we bet 2 chips for 1 spin on a winner

did i miss something ?

thanks

[Tucktuckster]

or was it wait for a number to hit 5 times in under 75 and bet 1u on it for 13 spins. Then if it wins, you stop the session and start a new one with 2u on it. Again for 13 spins?

[Kon-Fu-Sed]

Hello,

First of all:
What was tested by Mr Oops is not ONE method.
It is described like this on his site:

Instructions for Record 'n' Bet:
The system is played in sessions. Start your first session at any time / spin you like. There must, however, be time to finish a complete session. The [highlight]length of a session is for the user to decide[/highlight]: it is the sum of the lengths of the Recording and the Betting.

1. [highlight]Recording:[/highlight] You record all spins in sequence [highlight]for a selected number of spins (X spins)[/highlight]. As in the above example: 24 spins are recorded.

2. [highlight]Selecting:[/highlight] You select all [highlight]numbers that fit one or more in a set of cathegories (Y numbers)[/highlight]. As in the above example: The cathegory is "numbers that won twice or more".

3. [highlight]Betting:[/highlight] (Starting at the spin immediately following the Recording phase's last spin) You bet all the numbers that fit into your cathegory [highlight]for a selected number of spins (Z spins)[/highlight]. You bet all spins in sequence. As in the above example: Betting the selected numbers for 36 spins.

Betting [highlight]flat bets or not, is for the user to decide...[/highlight]

As you can see, the user decides everything...

What Mr Oops did, and shows only a portion of, was a LOT of X-Y-Z combinations that he tested against his Hamburg spins.
Here is the page:
nolinks://xerxx.se/oops/tester/recnbet1.html


Second, and the real reason I'm breaking my company-rules by logging in here is:

reading my old friend Mr.Oops. We had work together for years until he left us a few years ago.
We constructed the "XYZ" strategy...

May I ask "Matyika" who he is?
Mr Oops writes on that page:

"Paul" gave me the idea to test this way to pick numbers.

So, you are "Paul"?
Please PM me some details of yourself that would be recognized as "Paul".

Maybe Mr Oops is dead but there are people still around, who knew him at the time.
I am actually in contact with a person who worked VERY CLOSE to Mr Oops when it came to tests and statistics on his site.
Very close.
He says he never heard of anyone named "Matyika" and certainly not when it came to "construct the XYZ".
What country did you live in at the time, "Matyika/Paul"?


See you guys, have to log-out now.
KFS


WOW!
I have to add that this:

He was just able to send me a very short message about the result: well over 10% winnings above the used bankroll/party.

..is simply not true.
Unfortunately the COMPLETE results tables are not there anymore. Excerpts are (use the "Table of contents" w/i the text)
But it is not true: Only some of the X-Y-Z combinations came out w/ a very small positive net and there was no consistency in the results.
(I know this from a very reliable source)

[lucky_strike]

Thanks Victor for a great post, its also the way you caculate the Estat using Masse ´Egale.

Cheers LS

[JLP]

Hi Forum,

Here is a test with Dublinbet numbers using the sheet I made time ago for Roulette Warfare.
In this one there was only 1 qualifying number after 75 spins that have appeared 5 times (n.13), but in the test it not hit on 13 spins.It hits the others that have appeared 4 or more times on 80 spins.

Cheers,
JLP.-

[Boo_Ray]

I cant download anything from here nolinks://xerxx.se/oops/tester/recnbet1.html

[hermes]

Had a bad experience betting after 4 repeaters, if somebody knows Andruchi's scam system bets exactly the same strategy (wait 70 spins and choose 4 repeaters). Some numbers repeats only 4 times in 300 spins. Many losses. Anyway, a good luck.
Hermes

[Kon-Fu-Sed]

Hi,

I was in a bit of a hurry yesterday afternoon so I think I didn't express my self very good.

This last spring I contacted a person on GG.
This person set me in contact with another person (also on GG) who could answer my questions.
At one time we were discussing the Oops site and he told me about his close relationship to Mr Oops.
And he offered me to give his name to the people at xerxx.se (the hosting site) to get it confirmed.
And they really confirmed it - they actually said they were informed in advance of my question...

So this person is genuine.
And as he says that he saw everything regarding tests and statistics, including mails and names, for the Oops site and cannot remember anyone named that way, I believe him.
But of course "Paul" could call himself "Matyika" nowadays...
Although "Paul" was not working together w/ Mr Oops on anything but suggested this test...

Why the "Matyika" person says that he knew and worked together with Mr Oops is beyond everyone's imagination.
If he has made a roulette method he can take all the credits he wants - why involve Mr Oops?
To use Mr Oops good reputation? Why?

Is "Matyika" a systems seller?


To claim that Mr Oops sent him a message claiming a 10% profit on a basically GF method... Is ridiculous.
If that had been the case; why would my friend develop totally other ways for playing the roulette?
And I mean TOTALLY different.
He could as well stick to the XYZ-method, if it had given that kind of profit.
It didn't.
So he didn't.

If you read the text on that page it says:

Only [highlight]a portion[/highlight] of all that [highlight]is published here[/highlight]: Net result in Units and Net result divided by Units bet. And[highlight] only for the table-entries with at least one positive result[/highlight].

Believe me: Neither Mr Oops nor his/my friend kept some secrets.
Once there was complete tables to download (for close-to everything shown at the site) but not any more - but the links are there.

([highlight]@ Boo_Ray:[/highlight] Check the home-page at nolinks://xerxx.se/oops/ - says it all )

But you WILL find the "positive excerpts" if you look for the "Table of Contents" in the next-to-last part of the article.


Both Mr Oops' and his/my friend's conclusion was that this was just another Gambler's Fallacy method ending in an average -2.7% units loss.
And I agree.


Best regards,
KFS

[kacso]

Interesting "pages".
1. "Matyika" is not a "system seller" !
2. He was in contact with Mr.Oops strictly thorough private e-mail and not per "forums".
3. "Matyika" was kind enough to reveal the "skeleton" of the strategy and not some "secrets".
4. He offered it for anybody to check and to try it absolutly free of any charge.
5. It is very surprising how different "roulette forums" answering this act. What is wrong ??????????
    Is he a criminal ? Will he "deplete" your money ? Does he want to do any harm to you ??????
6. I have the full "strategy" from Matyika, of course free of charge and checked it. The results ?
   Shortly said: phenomenal.
7.General advice for diverse "forums": if you see a strategy or tactic free of charge to play roulette than
   try it first at least on 1000-2000 spins and write down the results properly.
   As long as you did not check it than keep your bloody cakehole or windmill shot. To make sentences
   about things without to try and to know what is it, is only stupid "busybody" habit.       

[Tucktuckster]

kasco,

are you willing or able to share the full system so testing can be done.

there are many on here happy to test and will keep an open mind.

[JHM]

Yes, I think KFS is looking forward to test the system if it really can win over a million spins. It would be a breakthrough in roulette history.

[TwoCatSam]

kacso

I've been known to test a few systems and post videos showing good or bad.  If this puppy is phenomenal, I'll say so.  If it's a dog, I'll pet it and send it on its way.

Would you care to share?  I mean the whole system, like Mr Chips did.  Not a few hints here and there to keep an interest which would evaporate immediately should the whole system be revealed, but the whole "nine yards" as they say.

As Frazier said, "I'm listening."

TwoCatSam@cox.net.

If you want blind testing without my revealing the system, just say so.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

-