Super Roulette Software

[The Spiders Kiss]

Hi
First I would like to say that the results of the test look good thank you Sam.
However...and Ive kept quiet up to this point...I dont see how a test which ,lts be honest,if successful will promote the system differs from the Murph fiasco.
Certain people did a test for him that was successful and then we had an option(at our behest) to purchase the ability to do the same.
Surely all this test and that test does is highlight a good system for sale.
Maybe Ive got it wrong ..but I would like to see some kind of balance here.
Murphs was tested and was for sale at a price and so is this.
Im not saying you are selling this thing Sam but the seller obviously is.
This sits very much on the edge as far as I am concened
regards
TSK

[Lanky]

Hi Forum.

Maybe I can shed some light on this subject.

Victor Owns and is the Administrator of this Forum.

Apparently the man with the bot did the right thing and asked Victor if it could be tested.

Victor approved it....Ans asked Sam or I to do the testing.

Now if I turn the computer on and the toaster don't pop up or the car start then I am doing good.

Now Sam was the guy elected to do the testing an report back to see if it would be a Benefit to ALL OUR MEMBERS....those that wanted it anyway.

And also to report if it was no good to the MEMBERS as well.

So its no use blaming Sam for anything to do with this...He did what was asked of Him.

But we all Know Sam and to suffer the embarrassment of being called a Coward and be sworn at because He is trying to Help ALL The Members...is just plain Stupid.

Murph has now been warned and put into Post Moderation again until He can be more civil about things.

And Sam Please leave this Guys posts to Victor & I to deal with this time.

You let Him off the leash too soon last time Cobber.

Lanky.

[thomasgrant]

Well, if I may,
I have as stated somewhere in the forum.
That I have purchased systems and bots.
I started out with MMM many moons ago.
It was one of the firsts bots that I came across.
Then there was Roulette Sniper.
Note: No affiliate link to it.
Just mention it in passing.
Then many other Roulette Related products and services.
Some I have even promoted and made money with.
That does not sit well with some people.

But I digress.

There are many systems out there.
You can find out about them in here or in Wikapedia.
Systems as old as Martingale, and many others.

Any system is just that.
A system. You can follow it or not.
Some are better than others.

A bot is a GUI that spins the wheel.
And places the chips for you.
Not all bots are the same.
Some have different algorithms in them.
And have different interfaces.
Many have there own systems.

I have been fortunate to find Tiago and his NWR.
Also many moons ago. Ever since then.
I have supported Tiago in his efforts.
And recently have had the opportunity to test out his latest bots.

Tiago sent me the link to Super Roulette.
And after emailing Matt and calling him.
I made a decision to purchase it.
Same decision was made when it came to
purchasing the system that Murph was on about.

They are all my own choices.
So I take full responsibility for those choices.

I also am a affiliate to many a varied program.
Will not mention them here.
This has got me in some very heated discussions.
As the terms of reference or forum rules where apparently being broken.

So my point is...
That if I post something in here.
It is not always a sales pitch.
It is my own opinion.
The post may include the price I paid for it.
What the results are like.

If you have a brain.
You can make your own mind up.
To buy or not to buy.
It is your money after all.
Do with it what you will.

[thomasgrant]

Well said Lanky.
Glad to find another Aussie in here.
Matt is also Australian.

PS: how did you get that flag on your sig?

[Lanky]

Well said Lanky.
Glad to find another Aussie in here.
Matt is also Australian.

PS: how did you get that flag on your sig?

Hi Mate .

Yes Quite a Few of us Aussies on the Forum Now.

Shorty-Lohnro-Natural9-Mini Baccarat-Wiggy-Iwonder-Penrith punter-Moccoman-Pins-Pedro...Just to mention a Few.

Victor put the Flag thingy in there Mate....Maybe an ask from all the Aussies to Victor would do the trick. 

Good On Ya Mates.

Lanky.

[super-roulette]

Matt, how long have you been using and testing the bot (approximately how many spins in total)?

Hi Tangram,

I have been testing/playing with the software for close to three months now.   Every night is around 1000 - 1500 spins, so I guess that would be close to 150,000 spins (give or take a couple of thousand)

Cheers
Matt

[super-roulette]

All bots excel in only one department: operational speed.   In everything else, compared to a human brain, they fail and they fail miserably.   That you can't crack roulette by simply waiting for event (a) and then betting (b) is elemental; and it doesn't matter that there is no house edge.   This is all a bot can do.  .  .  .  wait, bet, wait, bet and on and on.   It has no concept of betting tactics and strategy or any of the ingredients required to be a roulette winner.   Your bot does not and absolutely never will rely on logic to win, as you claim.   Because it is so mechanical, it relies on the spin outcomes to be favourable at all times.   The engines that drive all roulette bots are fuelled by pure, unadulterated luck.   When you're in luck you win, when your luck is out you lose.   Anyone who uses a bot is skating on very thin ice.   The bare truth of the matter is that roulette bots are just a fad among lazy and gullible people.  

N6 I find your comments perplexing to say the least.  You are assuming alot when you have no knowledge of the systems that have been coded into the software.  Two of the strategies (one not yet released in the current version), actually bet EVERY spin and do not wait for any event or trigger to occur.  

I also take offense to being called lazy.  I use the BOT regularly and make a nice additional income to my regular income.  I have also spent countless hours conceptualising, testing and running the BOT to get it to where it is at.  In addition to my attention to this, I also work full time and have a family - I would not consider myself lazy.  Surely working smarter and not harder is what we are all striving for.  Automation of a process that used to require someone to sit at a computer for hours on end is a positive step forward in my eyes.

The game of roulette is not a mystical, magical thing, especially in the RNG world.  You have 36 numbers in a bag, pull one out and start again.  No physics or dealers involved.  No ball speed to be concerned about.  Just random numbers.  But the amazing thing is patterns do emerge that can be taken advantage of.  Yes it can be done manually, but personally I would prefer the automation of a tool that can operate on auto-pilot according to some pre-defined criteria. 

I also think you underestimate the removal of the house edge.  2.7% over a large sample of spins is a huge advantage.

Matt

[murph]

murph cant defend himself as the big boys have blocked me again cause i speak the truth .... murph

[Number Six]

Tiago,

I respect your skills as a programmer, I know what it takes to build a bot such as this one. I can't code myself but I've worked on a lot of bot projects for an array of purposes, from their design to implementation, complex ones and basic ones. If people want to explore bots as a way of playing RNGs then that is their prerogative. Automation is appealing but it can be deceptive at times, things don't always pan out as you're expecting. I understand you can do bots for live wheels. Now, this is interesting. If bots are to have any impact on the immediate future of roulette, then it will be with live wheels. There is massively more potential available to a bot for live wheel play than one for an RNG.

[TwoCatSam]

Impressive.
Ok, if I can be allowed to start another thread.
With real money. Then that would be great.
I have just purchased the software.
And will test it out over the next few days.
Make my first deposit this week.

TG

I have no objection and I can't see why anyone would.  I will be happy to tell you by e-mail, the settings I used.  TwoCatSam@cox.net

Please start your thread under "Testing".

Good luck.

Sam

[thomasgrant]

TG

I have no objection and I can't see why anyone would.  I will be happy to tell you by e-mail, the settings I used.  TwoCatSam@cox.net

Please start your thread under "Testing".

Good luck.

Sam

Email sent TwoCat.
And you can go to the topic that I started.
And see the current results.

[Kingpin]

Hi this is interesting, looks similar to roulette bot pro.

My main concern however is what Winkel also pointed out, that if getting all these winnings,
the Casino wouldn't pay out the money anyway.

Is nobody else concerned about this?
And does anyone have different experiences from above?

Best Regards
Kingpin

[thomasgrant]

Hi this is interesting, looks similar to roulette bot pro.

My main concern however is what Winkel also pointed out, that if getting all these winnings,
the Casino wouldn't pay out the money anyway.

Is nobody else concerned about this?
And does anyone have different experiences from above?

Best Regards
Kingpin

Na, you got to remember the number one rule.
The house always wins.

[TwoCatSam]

Since this is a quite active thread and I didn't want to start a new one to say this, I'll say it here:

Victor,

Love that "go up" "go down" feature!!  Geez, the colors are in color!! 

Sam

Guys.....

Bots are here to stay.  Like cell phones.  Will the casinos take counter-measures?  Probably.  What does that say?  Roulette can be beaten. 

What if I became the bot?  Played ten hours?  It is do-able.

Sam

[super-roulette]

My main concern however is what Winkel also pointed out, that if getting all these winnings,
the Casino wouldn't pay out the money anyway.

Best Regards
Kingpin

Hi Kingpin,

Thanks for your comments regarding the use of the BOT and issues that may arise concerning the casino catching on.

This can be counteracted in a few ways:
- only release a certain number of units.This is being strongly considered and will help prevent detection as well as protect current users.
- adding a random delay pause to the bot to further simulate human behaviour. This will make it appear more human driven rather than software driven
- supporting more casinos (live dealer most likely). This will give user's more options and 'spread the load' so to speak.

Thousands of people play online everyday and at the moment the number of users playing with this BOT would not be a drop in the ocean, so I would think right now detection is not an issue.

Cheers
Matt

[super-roulette]

-