Simple: play numbers as they appear, start with one credit on one number, if lose play 1 credit on 2 numbers, 1 credit x 3 numbers .......
It looks like this:
1 credit x 1 nuber
1 credit x 2 nubers
1 x 3
1 x 4
1 x 5
......
Important: Play until first + or 0 and than reset, if after 36 spins you are still in - reset .
If you have hit but you are still in - , continue betting without any change
I did some research: I played 42 virtual sessions and here are results they look pretty good : :D
credit at spin
21 5
21 5
15 6
33 2
21 5
21 5
15 6
26 4
18 10
11 34
8 7
0 8
30 3
9 14
4 26
21 5
8 7
0 8
30 3
9 14
4 26
21 5
7 7
30 3
15 6
0 8
10 14
-125 36
10 14
7 11
4 26
30 3
7 11
15 6
21 5
15 6
8 7
10 25
33 2
21 5
8 19
0 8
4 12
0 8
33 2
2 17
-43 24 ( i did not played after 24)
8 11
8 7
26 4
15 6
total: profit 469 in 429 spins
It looks good so far .... it was not my idea to play like this at first, but after researching this showed best way. I still think it could be improved even more, it could be done by more research !
Thought I'd give this a whirl playing for fun on Betvoyager's No zero wheel.
1st series 13 spins +6
2nd 7 +8
3rd 8 +0
4th 36 -302 Only 7 hits
OUCH
Regards,
Rudy
Hy Rudy, thank you for your little test!
4th 36 -302 Only 7 hits
that is about worst it can get, but it is expected and I hope this system can recover from that loss. In a worst scenario ever we lose 666 units if 36 number hits only once, and that is what I like at this system the most.
At first I had idea to play system only till 8th step of progression, so if we have one hit we are in + and if we lose we are in -36. That was not so bad but did not work. So i start testing how long we should go with progression and this way seam to be best to play. First i tracked bankroll after 8, 12, 18, 24, 36 steps for 30 sessions: And here are results:
After 8 steps : -87
12: 64
18: 230
24: 348
36: 160
After that I start to track results even more detailed between 14-24 steps and results
after 14: 71
15: 79
17: -4
18: 47
19: 91
20: 92
21: 49
22: -3
23: -100
24: 77
I tested this only 12 sessions and get tired, but I think we can see pattern here. The best results are about 20 steps. I only have 3 more trials left on my Roulette extreme so for now i wait to have more time to run some more tests. Like I tested this I would like to found wot would be optimal exit point! Is it at 20 steps ? because after that we have more than 18 numbers to bet on ?
So if can somebody help me on this ?
Adriatik
I'm not clear on your meanings. Do you bet only the first five numbers to come, or continue adding numbers?
Does "reset" mean you've lost and you start over?
Sam
Hi Adriatic,
this system might be winning in a short time, but in a long run it is losing a lot. See the results in 30.000 spins at 20-spin sessions:
(https://www.vlsroulette.com/proxy.php?request=nolinks%3A%2F%2Froulette.euweb.cz%2F1%2C2%2C3%2520System%2520-%2520testing.gif&hash=260dd45b9e95f3e78756a1d65dad6a557414a7db)
The results are the same even for 37-spin sessions and remain the same in the test of 1.000.000 spins...
Sorry for disappointment
Evangelis
Sam,
I continue adding nubers as they appear so each spin we lose we add one new number.
Insted reset there should be restat (start from begening). If we are on 0 or hyer - restart, and if we are still losing after 20 (or 36) spins - restart
Evangelis,
Thank you very much for coding my system. My expectations were not too hy, that is why I am not too dissapoint too much :'(
System holded on for about 15 000 spis and than fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiju :D
I can not think of any improvment at this moment, if anybody have any idea please post it !
I dont want to sound despert but, one thing I noticed here ! ::)
My results for 42 sessions: profit 469 in 429 spins looking wery good but in Evangelis code they did not looked so good !
can it be bacuse of this :
when I was testing it in Roulette Extreme I was dooing like this: tested it in 36 spins and than used start new session button so all prevous nubers was cleared ! I tried to test it once in continous like it does when we code system and run it for large nuber of spins and had bad resultat in relativly short time. Maybe it is because RX in beeging does not act like it should ???
Can you Evangelist (just to be shure) add in your code one thing: when we are restarting session next 100 spis we have no bet and after that 100 spin we start to bet again ?
Forget this system , i used the same method and found it looses a lot after only a few sessions.
Kingspin,
thank you, I understand that it is definetly losing system like every system I know. But I think the Idea was not so bad !
No Umag your idea was good. Who doesn't try knows nothing. We get smarter through trials and errors. Edison could tell you how many times he hit the wall before the light hit his head. Explore further, be not afraid of errors. Errors are human.
Good Luck
Hermes
Hermes,
Why Umag ? I am from Dubrovnik :) And i prefer Tesla not Edison ;D