Edit: The best pro roulette tips are at nolinks://nolinks.roulettephysics.com (nolinks://nolinks.roulettephysics.com) but the article above is about a different site that's a scam.
Only a few weeks ago since professional roulette player and roulette strategy creator Kim Larsen also known as Vegasdude re-launched his website uncovering how he has been making a fortune literally robbing the casinos legally for years playing roulette and how any one else can do it by following his award winning roulette chaos theory strategy.
Roulette, translated as "small wheel" is the most popular casino game in most European and American casinos. A very primitive version of roulette was introduced in the 17th century by the French scientist, Blaise Pascal.
The roulette wheel is kept spinning all the time and speed up once a game is about to begin. The croupier rolls a little ivory ball along the inner edge of the wheel in the opposite direction of its spin. As the wheel turns, the ball loses momentum and it bounces among the slots and finally falls into one of the numbered slots. Bettors can place their bets right up until the time the wheel slows down and the ball drops into place. The number that the ball rests on is declared as the winning number for that game.
One to six players can be seated at the roulette table. Roulette is the only game in the casino where players purchase special non-value roulette chips, each player with their own colour so that the dealer can tell the bets apart. These chips must be cashed in at the roulette table before leaving. The chips have a set value depending on the minimum bet set at the table, but a player may request whatever value he wishes for his chips. The dealer will then specify the worth of that particular colored chip by mating a sample chip which is placed upon the rim of the wheel. Roulette players may also bet larger amounts by using $1, $5 and $25 regular casino chips.
Numerous books have been written on different casino games and systems. But until recently only games such as black jack and poker has been considered games of skill and strategy. Vegasdude is trying to change this false fairy tale as he calls it.
Stories about professional gamblers come and go every few years in-between but Kim's story is very different and extraordinary. He hit the news stands a few years ago, when he was kicked out and banned from 4 Las Vegas casinos in the same month for winning to much!
Last year he was featured in a cable TV show about professional gamblers where he as the only participant accepted a bet to prove his ideas. He turned a $500 bankroll into $10,000 within one day by playing the inside numbers of a roulette table while being followed by a camera.
The show made him an instant legend but also made his life as a professional roulette player a lot more difficult because his picture was featured in a lot of gambling magazines.
He has now decided to spill the beans and teach anyone interested in his winning roulette gambling strategy and how he has been beating all these casinos thru the last 10 years!
The newly launched website is called and anyone interested in knowing the insider secrets about the game of roulette and how to profit from gambling should take a good look because he is a legend when it comes to professional gamblers!
Article by Bobby, Progamblernews
If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the organization listed in the press release. Issuers of press releases and not PR Leap are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content.
This website was created a few years back.
Wow...i really haven't posted for so long.
All the best to you all.
Regards,
NoBody ^.^
........Kim Larsen is an scam and fake profil. He would have turned 500 into 10.000 live on an NeW York Cable Network. However, no one ever saw it and it was not tapped.
Besides that we " The Roulette community " already have gone over Kim Larsen on the GG, VIP etc......
This is old news......... move on.......
Carlitos 8)
There is no such a thing as a winning roulette system. NO bet selection exists to make it a winning game. Therefore all bet selections are coupled with some kind of money mangement method to get the player out of a very deep draw down.
Those drawdowns might even be the size of the Grand domestic Product of states like Gambia.
Remember , there ain`t NO such a perfect system . Just pure common sense shall be the judge. Furthermore some people proclaiming that there are a handful of expert players who never would sell their system but are keeping their play a well guarded secret . The truth about those players is not only that they are high rollers but HOLY rollers------ praying for that most needed win.
Those same cats are walking around with an aura of infallability while at the same time parading around feeling rotten in their guts.. Any one claiming to have above 65 % winning returns is either a liar or a politician
BEWARE OF false prophets. :diablo:
Nathan Detroit
Nathan my friend,
Usually agree with your comments but this
time am not.Actually in most yes/esp.about polit./but that there
is not a winning method....i can not agree
When one reaches age of 70,is more patient,wise and satisfied
with small wins,but regulary.When I retire/as if am not/from
playing will let you know how......Iboba 8) 8)
Quote from: iboba on October 30, 2009, 02:16:16 PM
Nathan my friend,
Usually agree with your comments but this
time am not.Actually in most yes/esp.about polit./but that there
is not a winning method....I can not agree
When one reaches age of 70,is more patient,wise and satisfied
with small wins,but regulary.When I retire/as if am not/from
playing will let you know how......Iboba 8) 8)
You seems to be a wizard at Roulette,i bet you have try 100 systems out the.Im currently working on a 26 numbers strategy,ok till now,but fast hands quick vision required.SEYKID.
OMG, this cant be the best things get. Sometimes it sucks when I'm right. Ken
Seykid,
I would like you to consider the following and it is just my opinion but here goes.
If you cover all 37 numbers (not that you ever would of course) you will lose 2.7% every spin from here to doomsday.
Your bankroll would get wiped out fairly sharpish.
Now you suggest that you are experimenting with a 26 number plan. I would like to point out that when you play 26 numbers, 25 of the numbers you played are losers. So if you play 26 numbers every spin, you are been subject to the house ege affecting you on the 25 losing numbers you get. Where do you think this will end up? In my opinion you are getting no value for your bets if you play too many numbers. When the period comes where the deviations against you are high, you will lose plenty of chips.
V.B. players have the right idea. Mostly they are covering just a few numbrs. They are getting true value for their winning bets. In fact if they have the edge, then they are getting even more generous odds. Now not all of us will have the ability to perfect these skills and we may have to adopt other strategies that will give us some kind of advantage, even if it is on a hit and run basis that some disagree with. I hope you see the point I am making. You can either make it easy for the casino or hard, it is your choice. Now all what I have said above is based on flat betting and it may be that using some kind of progression will lead you to think that playing 26 numbers is safe and you can ride out the storm. In that case, the best of luck to you my friend.
Do I win with every bet ? NO
Does Mr. J win with every bet? NO
Does the roulette king win with every bet?NO
Does Kelly win with every bet?NO
Does C. Kaisan win with every bet ? NO
Would Prof Einstein have won every bet? NO
Does Enrique Malou win every bet? NO
I am talking about WINNING BET SELECTIONS not tied in with any negative progression with a doubtful outcome but just " SWEATY LITTLE HANDS ".
My friend Iboba and myself have chosen a bet selection which currently terminates at the 6th spin win or lose. It is conservative in nature but just as rewarding. If you want to win more............bring more ( cash). :ok:
Nathan Detroit.
Quote from: elmo on October 30, 2009, 03:55:11 PM
Seykid,
I would like you to consider the following and it is just my opinion but here goes.
If you cover all 37 numbers (not that you ever would of course) you will lose 2.7% every spin from here to doomsday.
Your bankroll would get wiped out fairly sharpish.
Now you suggest that you are experimenting with a 26 number plan. I would like to point out that when you play 26 numbers, 25 of the numbers you played are losers. So if you play 26 numbers every spin, you are been subject to the house ege affecting you on the 25 losing numbers you get. Where do you think this will end up? In my opinion you are getting no value for your bets if you play too many numbers. When the period comes where the deviations against you are high, you will lose plenty of chips.
V.B. players have the right idea. Mostly they are covering just a few numbrs. They are getting true value for their winning bets. In fact if they have the edge, then they are getting even more generous odds. Now not all of us will have the ability to perfect these skills and we may have to adopt other strategies that will give us some kind of advantage, even if it is on a hit and run basis that some disagree with. I hope you see the point I am making. You can either make it easy for the casino or hard, it is your choice. Now all what I have said above is based on flat betting and it may be that using some kind of progression will lead you to think that playing 26 numbers is safe and you can ride out the storm. In that case, the best of luck to you my friend.
Maybe the system you have tested or glimpse fail,i have so far hand tested more than 100 live spins + my 100 recorded live ball automated im still in a plus,a good plus i would say.Not bragging but havent spot this way of playing yet.XCITED.
The roulette wheel is kept spinning all the time........
This tells me the person writing knows very little about roulette!
If you're going to tell a tale about an elephant, don't you think you should go to the zoo and take a gander at one? Else, you might describe a giraffe!
Sam
Sam ,
You be better in entertaining/humor/then
fighting the wheel all these years.
And better pay.Keep it same.
..........................Iboba 8)
Indeed numbers do strange thing.I hand tested the 150 live spins(Its not a 10000) and im 412 units in profits,with progression.Till now the biggest losing streak is 3,biggest winning streak 10.Im sure im unto something. SEYKID. :yahoo:
"If you want to win more............bring more ( cash)." >>> BINGO on that. If you only have $160 as a BR, stay home, sorry. Ken
Quote from: Mr J on October 30, 2009, 04:54:03 PM
"If you want to win more............bring more ( cash)." >>> BINGO on that. If you only have $160 as a BR, stay home, sorry. Ken
Ok Mr Bankroll Maestro.
Maybe a bankroll of $ 160 is the proper bankroll for seykid29 . I have followed his posts somewhat and if he came out ahead by 20 % he was contented just like ELSIE the cow in Wisconsin.
If I lived next to a casino with a bankroll of $ 600 I could pick up $ 75-100 per day that`s niothing to sneeze at.
But mind you that`s for a table min of $ 5. At a $ 10 table I would require $ 1,200.--( yield 150-200
If I only need those amounts why should I drag $ 3, 000 to the casino? Just to impress people.? :diablo:_
I would not be able to tell tall stories at another board at which some of the Baccarat players are UNDERCAPITALIZED.
There a certain player is going to the casino with $ 4,000 when his bankroll for 3 sessions should be $ 18,000.--to
$ 24,000.--.
Therefore bankrolls are all relative to the locality of a player.
Nathan Detroit
"Therefore bankrolls are all relative to the locality of a player." >>> I somewhat agree. If you have to drive 2.5 hours to a casino, I hope you bring more than $200. I live 20 minutes away, should I only bring $500 with me? Ken
I did not say that. By locality I mean the economic area.
The table minimum is the decisive factor. What it costs you to get to a casino is of no consequense to me. You have to factor in this expense either ignoring this expense or by adding more sessions to you bankroll.
The ideal situation would be living in a town with casinos.
Flying to and staying 2 nites in Las Vegas is a horse of a different color than just visiting your " friendly neighborhood " casino.
Nathan Detroit.
I'll give an example. Before we had roulette here, I would drive almost two hours to the nearest casino. One morning I drove down there, only had around 1K. Played a method with no tracking etc. I lost the 1K in under an hour. Back to the car and headed home. lol Hey, if some people are happy with a $400 BR, knock yourself out, it doesn't affect me. Ken
Savvy players know the method they play BEFORE they enter a casino. They also know the bankroll requirements for this particular method. They also know the pre-established loss limit.
plan the play and then play plan. Simple as that. :ok:
Nathan Detroit
Is that directed towards me or everyone in general? Ken
This is in general because you got your plan for quite a while . So stick with it. Like I would never shift to other methods either.
The worst thing anyone can do is tell some one to change their plan. Many roads lead to Rome. Depends which one is being taken. It`s up to the traveler.
Nathan Detroit.
P.S.Ken , maybe some people were following this conversation and made them consider what was being said.
Can you imagine this conversation taking place at ( deleted) .
By now the names of several inhabitants of a zoo would have been posted not to forget the comical characters of a crircus would have made their debut. Sad but true. :ok:
Very true sir and yes, sad. I dont know buddy, I'm getting worn out. Ken
Hi Ken,
Im just wondering :-\
What is your typical Bankkroll and on average what can you win that day,with that kind of money?
Seykid.
BR is around 3K and my NETS really vary. $400 - $2,600. Average time playing is 7-10 hours. Ken
Hi Ken,
Thanks for answering.So that adds up nicely if it is constant.So you play that many progressions or you prefer flat bet with such large BR??
If it is constant, sure. There are loses OF COURSE and they do sting. (PS -- whats a flat bet?) Ken
Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 02:16:45 AM
BR is around 3K and my NETS really vary. $400 - $2,600. Average time playing is 7-10 hours. Ken
[/quote finaly I get right answare after long time:))
"finaly I get right answare after long time" >>> ???
Flat bet is my term for bet with no progression,where your wins cover your loses,Or is that a dream,not possible? :-\
seykid.
Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 03:07:13 AM
"finaly I get right answare after long time" >>> ???
MR.J no worry im just talking about time which we have to spend with wheel to make some money..sometimes it is not easy and hour orr two isnt enough>>>:
Concerning Flat Bet,i try to test my new 26 numbers strategy with 150 casino live spins i was up and down, (at times +90 up)at the end of 150 spins i was -36 units down.With progression im +412 units. :D
Seykid.
Seykid,
Why make changes when you are doing ok. If it ain`t broke....... don`t fix it. :ok:
Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!
Ok.It's just that i am running my strategy through different frankenstein process...its aliiiive :shout:
Thanks for your view.Appreciated.
Seykid.
Hi Ken,
Yes me again.Are you a professional roulette player?
Seykid.
Thats open to interpretation. Full time player? No. Do I know what I'm doing? Yes. Ken
Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 09:34:21 AM
Thats open to interpretation. Full time player? No. Do I know what I'm doing? Yes. Ken
Elaborate the second part.You mean like playing what you can afford to lose,sticking to your bet etc...
By the way a pro/semi-pro advice,How much numbers you encourage playing?
Seykid.
How many numbers? 1-4 numbers but 2-3 is my favorite and remember, thats only my OPINION. When I started out, I played what I could NOT afford to lose (including the rent) but did so anyways. Why? I didn't care, the "lure" to me was more important than being a working sucker. Now, I CAN afford to lose, so its not the end of the world. Not sure if this answers your question. Ken
So you are either playing repeaters or sleepers i guess.
Thats a *LONG* answer. lol My methods are scattered over many boards under many names and two NEVER posted. Some methods I no longer play because of too many loses but if you read older posts, I guess you would not know that cause its still listed. Sleepers? I play them LESS now compared to a couple years back but I do "mess with" playing a sleeper (furthest back) after it has hit. I play around 4 different (listed) methods. One of my favorites >>> I track all spins and locate the furthest back hit street. It must be a minimum of 27 spins back. I then WAIT until it hits, lets say its the 7 8 9 street. It might hit right away or I had one sleeper street for like 110 spins a few weeks ago !! Lets say the 8 hits. I then start a 56 step progression on the 7 & 9, all the while keep track of everything hit. After a win, start over. This method has NETTED me *ALOT*, I'll leave it at that. Ken (PS -- I hope none of my posts here get deleted, you never know)
Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 11:14:31 AM
Thats a *LONG* answer. lol My methods are scattered over many boards under many names and two NEVER posted. Some methods I no longer play because of too many loses but if you read older posts, I guess you would not know that cause its still listed. Sleepers? I play them LESS now compared to a couple years back but I do "mess with" playing a sleeper (furthest back) after it has hit. I play around 4 different (listed) methods. One of my favorites >>> I track all spins and locate the furthest back hit street. It must be a minimum of 27 spins back. I then WAIT until it hits, lets say its the 7 8 9 street. It might hit right away or I had one sleeper street for like 110 spins a few weeks ago !! Lets say the 8 hits. I then start a 56 step progression on the 7 & 9, all the while keep track of everything hit. After a win, start over. This method has NETTED me *ALOT*, I'll leave it at that. Ken (PS -- I hope none of my posts here get deleted, you never know)
Wow that is a long progression. I will re cap on your systems.Thanks.
This is NOT a reply:
But many posts here remind me of : " I will always be chasing rainbows".
Good luck to ALL of you . May someday reality will catch up with you . There are no winning systems and NEVER will be.
Too many egomaniacs are walking the boards all over the globe and their stuff is eaten up hook line and sinker. .
Au revoir.
Nathan Detroit
There is NO winning system ! NEVER EVER !
Just enjoy the illusion..
Whats the definition of that? If a method is "WAY UP" (I dont mean $400) and THEN slowly starts to tank......then the method is kicked to the side and never played again (keeping the profits), any issue with that? And, kicking it to the side is ASSUMING it will continue to tank. I assume that instead of HOPING it doesn't. Ken (PS -- what is wrong with GG lately?)
Hi,i post this back no one answers,maybe you can.Have you ever pick 5 fresh numbers,every number spin add to list,every repeat add 3 units for 37 spins.I call it Build up Method. SEYKID.