Good system, anyone wants to test it?

[averagejoe]

take note of 40 spins , you need to have a minimum of 12 sleeping numbers and a maximum of 13

if you have more than 13 numbers, wait till you have only 13.  i. e.  1-10 extra spins.

if there are less than 12 numbers, cross your first 10 spins and take note of the next 10 spins
see if now you have 12-13 sleeping numbers.  if not, repeat this step.


bet on those 12-13 numbers.
all spins bet on the same ones.
start playing 3 chips per number.
whenever you win, lower bet 1 chip.
if you lose 2 spins on a row, raise bet 1 chip.

quit whenever:

you are winning 40+chips.  (you can lower this)
if you hit 5 times within the 1st 9 spins.
if you hit 6 times within the 1st 12 spins.
if you hit 11 times.
at spin 74th counting from start.  (if you had to wait 10 extra spins then add this to 74+10)

you can recycle numbers to make multiple tests.




variant : use 11-13 numbers.

[Mr J]

Lets see if the AP (cough) crew is consistent with THIS thread?

Ken

[ADulay]

Lets see if the AP (cough) crew is consistent with THIS thread?

Ken

Kenny,

  Your continued "act" about VB or whatever it is you're crusading about it really childish now.  Every single roulette board has this nonsense from you on it.

  Whoever this guy is that started the thread is offering up an idea.   What that has to do with your crusade on VB is beyond me.  I just don't get it.

  AD
 

[Mr J]

No, no, no........I get slammed maybe 80% of the time from the AP (cough) crew when I post a method. I assume they will do the same for all methods, not just mine. Its called being consistent. I hope it does not get nasty on this thread (for averagejoe).......just sayin.

Ken

[averagejoe]

sorry, whats the AP?

[ADulay]

No, no, no........I get slammed maybe 80% of the time from the AP (cough) crew when I post a method. I assume they will do the same for all methods, not just mine.
Ken

I don't believe I've seen anybody "slam" you.

They may "slam" your childish behaviour, but nobody appears to be "slamming" your methods that I can see.

This would be why it looks so comical when you keep bringing up this apparent persistent bronchial condition you appear to  have.

AD

[medo]

sorry, whats the AP?

Advantage player...or visual balistic.....playing the whell
not the carpet.

[Mike]

playing the whell
not the carpet.

That's true as far as it goes, but AP is much more than playing the wheel rather than the layout. AP is using physics to try to predict where the ball will land. That includes physics of the wheel (and how imperfections may affect where the ball lands), and of the ball (speed of release, type of ball etc) and may include the physics of the environment (such as humidity).

You can play systems which only "play the wheel" but that doesn't mean it's AP. For example, counting the numbers of times a ball lands in a particular sector and then betting on it when the sector becomes "hot" is playing the wheel, but since no physics is used it isn't AP.

[Mr J]

I don't believe I've seen anybody "slam" you.

They may "slam" your childish behaviour, but nobody appears to be "slamming" your methods that I can see.

This would be why it looks so comical when you keep bringing up this apparent persistent bronchial condition you appear to  have.

AD

@Goofball >>You won't even get Ken haters to agree with you on that. You can pick any message board. Look at my methods posted and then some other persons method. RARELY will you see the same treatment. Do I care? No but I would prefer a little more consistency.

Ken

[medo]

That's true as far as it goes, but AP is much more than playing the wheel rather than the layout. AP is using physics to try to predict where the ball will land. That includes physics of the wheel (and how imperfections may affect where the ball lands), and of the ball (speed of release, type of ball etc) and may include the physics of the environment (such as humidity).

You can play systems which only "play the wheel" but that doesn't mean it's AP. For example, counting the numbers of times a ball lands in a particular sector and then betting on it when the sector becomes "hot" is playing the wheel, but since no physics is used it isn't AP.

You have read many stories about it,its very obvious.

[medo]

-