Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I Have Stopped Fighting Random - Idea in the Making

Started by rjeaton1, May 28, 2009, 01:58:46 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rjeaton1

Alright, so for the last two days I have been reading about "random" and "chaos".  Ton of reading material there, let me tell you.  However, there was one thing that I found to be a common thread in the things that I've read and that is...random does, by nature, in short bursts, produce small patterns.

However, to look at the results "random" produced over the long term as a whole, patterns become irrecognizable and it is just that...random.

I'm of the opinion that is why the LW tracker (I've never used it, or even looked at it for that matter.  However I have read the threads about it and have the basic idea) can work.  Doesn't mean it's the HG, but it does show promise.

This idea "in the making" I had does not have to do with LW's however.  The idea of it is very much the same though.  I just recently started looking at the outcome's of the roulette table a bit differently.  This is how I've been looking at them:

In 37 spin sequences
A number comes out once, you type 1 into notepad, word, excel, whatever you use for tracking.
A number comes out twice, you type 2 into notepad
A number comes out three times you type 2 into notepad (it appeared more than once, so we count it as a double)
and so on.

You type them like this 1121112211222111 etc. until you have hit 37.  Go ahead and open up RXtreme's wheel frequency tracker (it makes this easier) and give it shot.  You'll (I guarantee this) see patterns.  They're short, and almost imperceptible....but they're there.

I have attached just the beginnings of what my research is returning.  I have seperated the bunches of numbers into groups that I deem to be patterns.

So instead of seeing what you see above, you'll see 1 121 112211 222 111  Now everybody perceives patterns differently, so I'm not saying this is set in stone.

I've just started actually playing this (now you can see how it resembles the LW tracker) and I must say I'm having incredible results.  Right now, it's too early to tell if it should be attributed to luck, or I'm on to something viable.

I am requesting input on this, so please, any input at all would be valued.

I as always welcome opposing viewpoints provided they're given in a respectfull manner.  You will not be deemed a "naysayer" as long as you're not just throwing negative comments around.

NUMBER SIX - I believe I may be coming to join you in the Law of the Third study group where you are looking for a semi-non-mechanical-da-da-da-da fluid type METHOD.

That does not mean I am leaving systems behind however, as I believe I am onto something there as well.


I encourage everybody to delete the spaces from the numbers I have uploaded, and re-seperate them into what you think the patterns are (and if you even think there are any)

Also, if you think there is something to this, try it yourself and try to predict whether the next spin will be a 2 (remember, a 2 is any time a number isn't a unique number) or a 1.  I've gotten pretty good at, but again we're still in the early stages.






rjeaton1

Oh, and just so everybody understands what it is you'd be playing.

Let's say the following happens:

1 121 1111 22 121 - alright now you think either one of two things will happen now - the 121 pattern will break (another 1 will show up), in which case you will bet all the numbers that haven't appeared.

OR

You think the 121 pattern will continue into 1212 - In which case you would bet on all the numbers that have already come out.

gingermolloy

I seem to remember Winkel posting a system that used mirrors, it seemed to work well for evens chances, maybe it will work for this.

You could split the pattern like this.

11211 1221 12221 11 

You would bet on any number that would make a mirror, although i fear there would be many of them.

Ill try to find the post by Winkel

ginger


rjeaton1

Thanks Ginger!

I'll be looking into this...still ironing this out...lot's to look at right now, this is definitely a rough draft...

rjeaton1

-