Stop with rubbish systems,WIN WITH STATISTICS 100%

[NapoleonBonapatris74]

At the higher progression, you are nearing the top of many table betting limits.    Considering that (only on the last two spins) you are covering 5/6 of the table.    After only 4 spins, your odds of continuing to repeat are only 48%.    You moved up in the progression in just 7 spins, starting with only 1/2 the table covered.    This will fail in the short- to medium- term. 

Colbster it is obvious that you are e newbie here.
1.  It is wrong about table limits because here I play first street + numbers o splits. . SO it's not a problem the limit.
2.  I said this is tHe " soft" version , I have a version where onlly one win gives me profit.
3. On last 2 spins I cover 90% of table correct but In the previous 4 spins I covered first 50% after that 60% than 70 and 80%. .  On the first spin I cover 48% The odds after 4 spins are not 48% you are wrong
4. You got NO CLUE How I select what to bet, so explain me what are you talking about ?

Regards

[colbster]

Good luck to you, Napoleon.  Who am I to question the motives or skills of a left-handed French gambling guru such as yourself?

I hope your system makes you rich beyond your wildest dreams, and that those lucky enough to send you 150 euros are similarly enriched.

[NapoleonBonapatris74]

Napoleon, I am not agressive, just skeptical, OK? and u have to put with my sense of humour as well.  if u r offended -- I am sorry.  let's do the session, no problem

No Problem, OK please come on the forum chat so we can do the testings , ok?

[iggiv]

OK

[NapoleonBonapatris74]

Good luck to you, Napoleon.   Who am I to question the motives or skills of a left-handed French gambling guru such as yourself?

I hope your system makes you rich beyond your wildest dreams, and that those lucky enough to send you 150 euros are similarly enriched.

Dear Colbster, If I were rich I would not be here, don't u mind?
I alwas said that mine systems gives good long ruun little profite and minimizes teh risk for the bankroll.
I don't understand why for you it is wrong to sell something and gain extra money.  For that money I play about 3 hours, selling it maybe is a extra gain.
Anyway I do not want to have discussion with you
regards
p. s. I am not a guru as you say , I am simply an open minded person not like you

[NapoleonBonapatris74]

[iggiv] 10:48 pm: Napoleon u here?
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:48 pm: OK jst a moment iggiv
[iggiv] 10:48 pm: is it enough?
[iggiv] 10:48 pm: 90 here
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:48 pm: It is ok
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:48 pm: I will take last 60
[iggiv] 10:49 pm: ok good
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:49 pm: lecture is from up to down right?
[iggiv] 10:50 pm: yes yes
[iggiv] 10:50 pm: 3, 28, 7 are last
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:50 pm: OK Good, now SPIN BY SPIN I will tell you what to play and how much to bet
[Talking]: sancusa has left at 10:51 pm
[Talking]: jrhelp007 has left at 10:51 pm
[iggiv] 10:51 pm: and i am holding RX here
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:51 pm: BET 19-36 1 UNIT
[iggiv] 10:51 pm: sure
[iggiv] 10:51 pm: 1
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:52 pm: BET 19.36 1 UNIT
[Talking]: jrhelp007 has entered at 10:52 pm
[iggiv] 10:52 pm: 18
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:52 pm: b 19/36 1 UNIT
[iggiv] 10:53 pm: 7
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:53 pm: B 19 36 1 UNIT
[iggiv] 10:54 pm: 13
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:54 pm: B 19 36 1 U
[iggiv] 10:54 pm: 12
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:54 pm: :9 SEE FOR EXAMPLE STREAK OF LOSSES WE ARE IN GOOD BANKROLL STATE
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:54 pm: b 19 36 1 u
[iggiv] 10:54 pm: 23
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:55 pm: b 19-36 3 u
[iggiv] 10:55 pm: 25
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:55 pm: b 19 36 4 u
[iggiv] 10:56 pm: 8
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:56 pm: b 19 36 4 u
[iggiv] 10:56 pm: 32
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:57 pm: b 19 36  4 u
[iggiv] 10:57 pm: 13
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:57 pm: b 19 36 6 u
[iggiv] 10:58 pm: 20
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:58 pm: b 19 36  6 u
[iggiv] 10:58 pm: 9
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:58 pm: b 19 36 6 u
[iggiv] 10:59 pm: 27
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 10:59 pm: b 19 36 6 u
[iggiv] 10:59 pm: 4
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:00 pm: b 19 36 6 u
[iggiv] 11:00 pm: 36
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:00 pm: b 19 36 12 u
[iggiv] 11:00 pm: 36
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:01 pm: b 19 36  12 u
[iggiv] 11:01 pm: 30
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:01 pm: b 19 36 12 u
[iggiv] 11:01 pm: 29
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:01 pm: ok END SESSION
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:01 pm: we have a profit of +34 units
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:02 pm: right?
[iggiv] 11:02 pm: no, we have profit of =37
[iggiv] 11:02 pm: +37
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:02 pm: You can see much loss in a row  was not a problem for us     
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:02 pm: +34 profit
[iggiv] 11:02 pm: yes, well
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:02 pm: I wrote wrong +4
[iggiv] 11:02 pm: 37 i got
[NapoleonBonapatris74] 11:03 pm: Give me 3 minutes I must eat , we an continue to test the whole night if you want
[iggiv] 11:03 pm: ok me too

[birdhands]

What's going on here?  Looks like you're betting Hi every time, with a progression that I don't get either.  Is this the for sale system?

Sam

[iggiv]

well, first 2 sessions were good till Napoleon broke his own rules of win goal stop, and stoploss . then after this it went down really deep. So...I dunno. maybe if u keep stop loss and win goal low u can be OK.

[colbster]

The first two sessions of any system are good.  Look at martingales.  But it doesn't sound solid enough to base a commercial system on just yet.  Maybe he has a good basis, just needs some fine tuning and clarification of the hard and fast rules.

[NapoleonBonapatris74]

The first 2 sessions went OK means that we had nice profit with minimum risk. AFter thta on the third session I came again to profit, bud as I was playing without tracking numbers, but just like so, I continued to play same bet, and obviously the imbalance went  on the other@ so had a negative row. IN A REAL PLAY I WOULD NEVER DO THIS ANYWAY 10% STOPLOSS COVERS US!!! igiv  it is true what I say? You told me we are in profit on that third session but iI made a mistake and continued with the bet, THat is why mt system did not fail and I can do how manymore tests without doubts
: regards :

[WARRIOR]

OK here is the explanation:
I accept comments and critics about that system.   I do not say it is 100% but it is very hard to lose, I played thismuch times. 

BET/STREET - N.  STREETS.   - TOTAL BET - PROFIT
0.  50                6                      1.  5            1.  5
0.  50                7                       5              1.  0
1.  50                8                       17            1.  0
3.  00                9                       44            -8 ( IF lose go to level 10x11.  5   2times)
3.  00                9                        88            1
11.  50              10                    159           win=-21
11.  50              10                                      2.  0
SO WE COVER IN SUCCESSION 6-7-8-9-10 STREETS. 
There is also a version where we need only 1 win in one of these 5 steps to gain profit but it requires about 4x more units. 
I have also a special streets selection and it hapnes rarely to go on ste 9-10

Regards


p. s.  OBVIOUSLY THIS IS THE FREE SYSTEM I PROMISED NOT THE ONE THAT I SELL!!!

what kind of progression are you using.?

[iggiv]

The first 2 sessions went OK means that we had nice profit with minimum risk. AFter thta on the third session I came again to profit, bud as I was playing without tracking numbers, but just like so, I continued to play same bet, and obviously the imbalance went  on the other@ so had a negative row. IN A REAL PLAY I WOULD NEVER DO THIS ANYWAY 10% STOPLOSS COVERS US!!! igiv  it is true what I say? You told me we are in profit on that third session but iI made a mistake and continued with the bet, THat is why mt system did not fail and I can do how manymore tests without doubts
: regards :

yes, that's true. but what happened after ---really scared me. let's say we had 2-3 very successfull sessions, then...all went down to dogs. Which means for me it could easily happen on the first session. I am not drawing any conclusions, but say that happened in real casino: u come 2 hours earlier -- u r a king, u come to this wheel 2 hours later -- u lose. Maybe this is not a frequent event, i don't know...

[birdhands]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that sticking with the stop/loss protects you, as long as the winning sessions outnumber the losing ones in the long run.

Sam

[NapoleonBonapatris74]

Exactly bIrdhands, you got the point, I set the stoploss to -10% bankroll, and the goal is tow in 5-6% of bankroll!!!

[iggiv]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that sticking with the stop/loss protects you, as long as the winning sessions outnumber the losing ones in the long run.

Sam

can't argue with that. even with losing systems if u apply this, u won't lose too much. If his system is winning as he says then yes. Also if i applied this kind of system i would never play 2 sessions in a row. I would hit-n-run. So i can't draw any concrete conclusions but can tell that by what i saw Napoleon's system may possibly win, especially with hit and run. Playing even chances. He also showed playing 2 dozens, but that's always dangerous, and i would not play it like that. Yes, he won with 2 dozens as well, but i did not like the idea.

[iggiv]

-