Hi All
Is anyone aware if any tests have been done for literally betting numbers on the carpet in numerical order from 1 right through to 36 then again and again - in the hope of dupes being spun?
My limited excel knowledge is my downfall.
For example:
On the left is the carpet order of betting and on right is the number spun:
1 number bet
0 - 5
1 - 13
2- 35
3 - 30
4 - 4 W
5 - 26
6 - 8
7 - 21
8 - 28
9 - 29
10 - 31
11 - 32
12 - 27
13 - 20
14 - 31
and so on to 36 then repeat over and over.
From my initial slow tests in excel - dupes do occur with obvious gaps in between but then I tested it the same but with the corresponding number to left and right as I noticed this happened a lot too e.g:
3 number bet
36-0-1
0-1-2
1-2-3
2-3-4
3-4-5
4-5-6
So if any of the 3 numbers are spun on each bet its a win - you aren't just relying on the middle number but also its left and right buddies.
Does this make sense? I haven't worked out a progression yet. Would love to get this tested on roulette extreme and see how big the gaps are between a hit. Test both the 1 number bet and the 3 number bet.
Apologies if I'm treading old ground,
Zelx77
Hi Zelx
have seen dupes when playing like you say, look in general board, there is a couple post there where played rng in Ladbrokes stevenage, think you'll find it good reading.
Only thing is i've dropped the zero,so count next number to continue sequence
Thanks, I will have a look for that.
Zelx
when and if you get a hit do you drop back to one or carry on to 36.
Here's 59 spins today in ladbrokes.
1-2 w
2-26
3-9
4-0
zero omitt,
4-2
5-18
6-26
7-30
8-17
9-6
10-6
11-29
12-35
13-10
14-9
15-28
16-25
17-3
18-36
19-18 w
20-7
21-18
22-9
23-2
24-32
25-8
26-1
27-8
28-28 w
29-10
30-13
31-25
32-16
33-11
34-1
35-20
36-21
1-23
2-21
3-27
4-27
5-17
6-21
7-8 w
8-26
9-14
10-17
11-18
12-14
13-30
14-30
15-23
16-34
17-32
18-22
19-0
omitt the zero
19-8
20-6
21-28
Zelx let you work out whether it pays, just thought you might like the numbers
The way I play is: start at 1, then numerically all the way to 36, then start from 1. That is it. Never changes.
So looking at the numbers you got below - we have a win on the very first spin. In my first post I explained how you can also bet adjacent numbers, for example if you are on '4' - you also bet 3 and 5.
So back to your numbers, we have a win with a dupe '8' and 3 wins with adjacent numbers (2, 28,14).
If using the adjacent method, we are betting 3 units straight up each time, so it's working out a progression/cut off point.
1 2 W
2 26
3 9
4 0
5 2
6 18
7 26
8 30
9 17
10 6
11 6
12 29
13 35
14 10
15 9
16 28
17 25
18 3
19 36
20 18
21 7
22 18
23 9
24 2
25 32
26 8
27 1
28 8
29 28 W
30 10
31 13
32 25
33 16
34 11
35 1
36 20
1 21
2 23
3 21
4 27
5 27
6 17
7 21
8 8 W
9 26
10 14
11 17
12 18
13 14 W
14 30
15 30
16 23
17 34
18 32
19 22
20 0
21 8
22 6
23 28
I really want to test this properly on roulette extreme to see how it holds up long term. You any good with coding?
I did this method years ago , you can win yes , but you get heavy losses too. Forget it! Keep trying! I have done every method known to man and they all loose eventually. I mean it's no good winning 1k then loosing it on the next day of play which is what happens most of the time.
Here's a simple spread sheet with some Wiesbaden numbers.
You can copy and paste your own numbers.
well that answers that, cheers Seagull,
Thanks Seagull for revisiting this brainstorm with your spreadsheet. Is there any chance you could try one last test and modify the spreadsheet so that you also get a win for a number on either side of target number, meaning we are betting 3 numbers all the time, so it starts (target number in bold and it's adjacent numbers to bet):
0-1-2
1-2-3
2-3-4
3-4-5
4-5-6
5-6-7
6-7-8
7-8-9
8-9-10
ect.
If this also tanks in the same way, I will forget this for sure.
thanks
Apologies.
Only saw your post today.
Thanks again Seagull for your help with this.