Randomness Effectiveness Versus Visual Ballistics Effectiveness

[Spike!]

Beating the bushes.>>

Don't worry, it won't last. It'll be all over sooner than you think. The casinos get smarter every day. Just write your book and be happy with that..

[Herb6]

The End Is Near

nolinks://radioexile.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/EndIsNear3.jpg

[Spike!]

Nobody will buy your book, but at least you can brag about it, thats whats really important.

[Herb6]

Maybe if I include some flashy picture of hot chicks?

[bombus]

Maybe if I include some flashy picture of hot chicks?

Good idea!

Here she is... Miss VB 2010.

[gizmotron]

French women are just weired.

[Spike!]

Here she is... Miss VB 2010.>>>

Mrs Herb? Now thats just embarrassing, get a wax fer crying out loud..

[bombus]

...get a wax fer crying out loud..

A bit late for that. I think Herb's money would be better spent on a collar & leash.

[Spike!]

Math oriented gamblers are on the very bottom of the experience list when it comes to practical sense.>>

Yup. Everything they do is on paper, and they think it makes them experts. It just makes them armchair quarterbacks, big deal.

[Herb6]

Exactly, we mathboyz is a iNgoranT buncH.

[Spike!]

Not ignorant, just inexperienced. If you had more experience, you would have figured out how to read random

[Herb6]

Yes, I am truly a foOL.

[Spike!]

You joke around, but if you knew, you'd have to wear Depends because you'd be crapping your pants at what your ignorance has overlooked.

Not my problem to wise up the chumps.

[gizmotron]

Snowman has no chance of figuring this out. He needs it to have a mathematical advantage or he will not do any work earning it. So he is the only reason he does not have the needed information that he NEEDS. 

If I'm making successful bets during a time of positive effectiveness then because of the results I must be experiencing a temporary state of advantage mathematically. Perhaps Herb/Snowman needs the advantage to always be there. I wonder why some people reject opportunity while embracing something as worthless as VB? Never say die.

[bombus]

I post this here because it doesn't really belong in the poxed out thread it came from.

Effectiveness follows the same Kind of states that reading randomness does. It's important to know the differences  when a perfectly good premise passes through the three states. It's important to make rapid adjustments. Change is the key to improving effectiveness results.

Using the EC's as an example, I take it that a "perfectly good premise" is one that loses to the house edge at about 2.7% on a single zero wheel.

I.e. always bet on black.

We then attempt to improve the results by betting only when randomness puts the premise in an effective state.

Once in an effective state, how many wrong guesses or decisions would it take to identify the fact that randomness has put the premise into a non-effective state?

The way spike talks, randomness is never in any state other than random. Only the guesses can be either effective or ineffective. That would make guessing when not to bet even more important than guessing what to bet on.

If not betting is an important part of the equation, then what % of the educated guessing game plan is stuck in virtual mode?

[bombus]

-