System like bikemotorman

[fqbien]

Hello,

System is simple.
Just bet the last win dozen, then last win column, last win dozen, etc ..

Using progression : 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,377, ...

Can somebody code it on RX ?
I really want to make tests with it on the long run.

I've start from 7€ and go to 60€ using 10c bets with that, and never loose, but i have not sufficient spins to claim something.

So, if somebody can code that and post in the download section of the forum ..

Thanks in advance.

[bikemotorman]

Are you playing 2 dozens or columns or just last col or dozen.

Stuart

[fqbien]

Just playing last column, then last dozen.

Just one each spin.

[hermes]

I played this strategy successfully but little bit different. Eg. play last coming dozen until you lose then switch to play last column until you win and continue play column until you again lose on column, then switch back to dozen and play the same strategy. Often happens that streaks on dozens and columns are interlocking. The Wiztek progression (12 spins) for one D/C is excellent for it.
Hermes

[fqbien]

Yes, why not hermes, and thanks for replying.

But if a dozen come to sleep ? Never seen that when you was playing ?

But i think that 12 spins is pretty safe.

Do you continue using this method ?


For my original post, nobody can code this or hermes's method ?
Really want to try that.

[bikemotorman]

You can and will lose 14 or more times in a row playing last one col then last one dozen, I have lost 14 times in a row and ran out of play bankroll on jebet about a month ago.
Yesterday I was playing last won col then last won dozen I had 11 straight losses lol very risky however if you play the first few losses in VIRTUAL MODE YOU SHOULD BE OK LOL.

Have a great day.


      Stuart

[Rebirtha]

Yes you can lose 14 in a row.. personally I think this wins enough that you could just do a progression up to 55 and then start over taking the loss.. Also have been getting better results not switching the columns and dozens, I just play one.

[hermes]

This method is not based on sleepers rather on active D/C. There will be always one D or C coming or zero! All 3 D/C cannot go sleep! That one which sleeps must be replaced by one agile - that's the law of roulette. Did you see all 3 D sleeping for 20 spins??? If 2 D fall a sleep then one will come 10 times in row what's excellent for this strategy.
You exploit the streaks on both, dozens and columns. If there is a choppy dozen trend you can hope some streak on columns to give you a hit and visa verse. I played it a lot 20 years ago when I didn't have any HGs but already at that time I had at least 5 keeper systems.
This method will make you a winner in more than 90% of the games. Try it on a few 100 spins and you see the amassing holding power.
If that method could be properly programmed it would be the best system on the market. I gave a few ideas for programming here but the guys are rather programming a s**t strategies than serious one. They cannot decide which one could be a  potential winner.
If you play only dozens you can get a 16 chops which will sweep your bankroll and wife will kill you. What I gave you is diversification in possibilities.
Cheers hermes

[bikemotorman]

Awesome post Hermes,

Now how can we build on this idea to make a profit and I think it will work.

Give me some ideas so we can make a profit but will we get killed on 0-00 wheel.

Thank you


           Stuart

[fqbien]

Hermes, can you give an example with numbers and what to play please ?

And what about witzek progression ?

Thanks.

[hermes]

Biky, forget US roulette! Even if you have to sit on boat and swim to Europe. Only Euro or better French roulette comes in question. I will give you tomorrow some example with Wiztek.
Cheers Hermes

[Rebirtha]

I"m not so sure trading dozens and columns helps at all... testing just columns and again with both it seems when trading off the progressions are generally much higher.

[Jish]

I think you will run into the same problems that bike did, you will last a while but the loss will wipe you out, as for coding it to RX- i dont know anyone on this forum that does it anymore

[Jish]

-