Im not sure if this has been trialed?

[Jish]

Ive been watching the thirds, once one of them appears twice in a row i place a 1 unit bet on the other two, if i lose i dont bet until the current streak runs out and then start again
Tested on 3000 RNG spins, total +45 units,

If i knew how to code it in RX i would but im still trying to learn it,
has anybody played this system?

[Jish]

Quote:  if I lose I dont bet until the current streak runs out and then start again......

I think this is why it lasts longer? because betting while the streak is on normally loses from any other tests i have seen

[iboba]

Quote:  if I lose I dont bet until the current streak runs out and then start again......

I think this is why it lasts longer? because betting while the streak is on normally loses from any other tests I have seen

Jish mate,
Concerning columns,you should always stay on 2 while these are streaking...
as in pairs can last over 20 spins sometimes.These phenom. don't happen
on dozens very often..................................Iboba

[TwoCatSam]

iboba

I would love to hear/participate in a discussion of why the dozens and columns act different--if in fact they do.  Here is my thinking:  If it should be true that they do act differently and since they are only twelve numbers, perhaps there are twelve other numbers not structured into a dozen or column which also act differently.  Perhaps they win more than they should.

Food for thought.

Sam

[Number Six]

I have also seens columns dominate for what I thought is an unusually long time. However, it isn't ususual at all. It's maybe quite rare, but not like "wow, look at that, unbelievable". I've never seen dozens dominate in the way those columns did, though I'm sure they HAVE, at some point in history that I wasn't there to witness. This is just another illusory factor of randomness that people think is reliable enough to be exploited. It's pretty much guaranteed that if you analysed many samples of random numbers you would find that dozens, columns, 12-number wheel sectors and any random selection of 12 numbers behave in exactly the same way. Though I'd be interested to hear the logical argument of someone who thinks differently. BTW, Jish, betting two dozens is not an economical bet. You'd be better looking at the so-called "law of series" with ECs.

[gizmotron]

Well let's look at that from an odds perspective Number Six .  You see a string of repeats in a single column from time to time. With less than 33% chance of that happening for each spin that's a very rare situation indeed. But what about a single column sleeping for a long stretch? The odds for that are less than 66% on each spin for that to happen. It's more likely that you will have many more chances where a dominance of something leaning in favor of the 66% sized groupings will occur. Is that reliable enough for you to speculate a bet on it? The law of series suggests that the larger group, with regards to singles, is a very active condition.

[gizmotron]

 Jish  - "If I knew how to code it in RX I would but im still trying to learn it,
has anybody played this system?"

It's a common method. If you do code it you will discover that it passes through times when it works well. It will also pass through times when it flat lines and times when it does very badly. That is what happens to randomness. So learn how to read the situational conditions for favorability. Then bet for the times when it is working in your favor. Sometime the opposite of the method is the favorable state. Learn how to recognize favorable conditions and when opposites are the favorable condition. It's possible to read the conditions.

[gizmotron]

Any group of twelve numbers acts just like any other group of twelve numbers. You will only see a difference if there is a biased wheel. It just matters when. Any group will act uniquely for that period. They all show the same characteristics if observed long enough. So it would be wise to prove that to yourself so that you don't suffer from magical beliefs.

[Number Six]

Gizmotron, I'm not disputing the reccurence of dominant trends in any sample of random numbers. In fact, it would be naive to think there wouldn't be any periods of spins where one bet or sector experienced an acceleration of hits from the expectation, sometimes dramatically. Your last post sums it up. There's no logical reason (minus bias) why any set of 12 number groups, based on the table or the wheel, would behave any differently to any other. If someone thinks otherwise, I'd like to know why. In effect, what it means is that it doesn't matter what you bet, it's the way you do it. That is what people obsessed with systems don't get. With a system, there is never any favourable condition, there is just the condition of randomness.

[gizmotron]

Number Six, I completely agree with this: "With a system, there is never any favourable condition, there is just the condition of randomness."

It's a lesson that must be learned the hard way.

I have learned that visual ballistics is caused by mathematical's fallacy.

[iboba]

iboba

I would love to hear/participate in a discussion of why the dozens and columns act different--if in fact they do.  Here is my thinking:  If it should be true that they do act differently and since they are only twelve numbers, perhaps there are twelve other numbers not structured into a dozen or column which also act differently.  Perhaps they win more than they should.

Food for thought.

Sam

Sam,
I'm witnessing it every day in playing A.F.L.2.C.W.C.C./you gave up last time on this/and all the
talk about recognising randomness at the present time,following or expecting x trends.....this my
friend it mayesty wheeldoes it  for us.Incredible but true.Why only on columns
That question I can't unswer,and it is not luck involved as this is going on for over 6 months
with same procedure....................................Iboba

[TwoCatSam]

iboba

When I said, "I give up" what I meant was this:  I asked a very simple question and all I got was obfuscation and bloviation.  I meant that I gave up on getting an answer to my question.

When people cannot give a straight answer, most of them obfuscate and bloviate!  It seem very difficult for humans to utter the words, "I don't know".

Someone--can't remember who--told me the meaning of your puzzle.  Still makes no sense to me.  I won't spill it here as I guess you want it kept secret.

Sam

[iboba]

iboba

When I said, "I give up" what I meant was this:  I asked a very simple question and all I got was obfuscation and bloviation.  I meant that I gave up on getting an answer to my question.

When people cannot give a straight answer, most of them obfuscate and bloviate!  It seem very difficult for humans to utter the words, "I don't know".

Someone--can't remember who--told me the meaning of your puzzle.  Still makes no sense to me.  I won't spill it here as I guess you want it kept secret.

Sam

It'is not a puzzle,if someone told you and you can't make sense of it,then it must be wrongly interpreted.
F-ollow T-the L-last 2-two C-columns W-with C-corresponding C-colours...................Very simple dear Sam,except there are some tweaks involved and if any queries about
it let us know.................................Iboba

[TwoCatSam]

iboba

Yes, I was told that.  The last two columns to come are either rr bb br or rb.  How does one follow that with a corresponding color?

Sam

[iboba]

iboba

Yes, I was told that.  The last two columns to come are either rr bb br or rb.  How does one follow that with a corresponding color?

Sam

Sam,
1-2 columns.....black corr.colour...as there are 14 against 10 in favour of blacks.
1-3 columns....red corr.  colour...same as above but opposite.
............................................read your mail...............Iboba

[iboba]

-