Can you tell the difference between RNG and Actuals? - a challenge

[Mr Chips]

Tangram,
 
I will put the degree of certainty by my choice and will examine the results at the end of the test. In set 1 it would have been 90%.
 
Set 2 = actuals 70%
 
Mr Chips

[Shorty]

I'll say RNG for set 2.

[Tangram]

Set #1 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90% 
Set #2 (Actuals) identified as Actuals with DOC 70% 

where DOC = "degree of certainty"

Set #3

22

31

10

21

12

14

22

10

34

10

16

29

31

15

23

2

33

25

3

19

28

29

28

13

15

11

32

13

35

25

30

7

30

8

18

15

3

32

13

35

18

14

6

21

1

19

15

30

26

32

33

30

35

12

19

5

35

18

23

7

19

27

19

35

30

19

28

23

29

2

24

29

16

2

17

36

34

20

5

12

23

11

17

7

35

18

9

16

17

4

6

2

7

32

27

10

8

11

19

33

32

11

9

17

13

23

20

20

29

3

12

29

9

11

15

19

2

4

36

9

4

9

36

34

17

25

11

23

11

5

25

8

6

22

22

11

13

1

17

24

33

19

21

26

26

35

25

34

24

6

36

35

10

35

14

33

5

23

5

19

26

4

22

9

18

22

31

7

33

24

25

27

25

10

10

6

8

8

30

20

18

30

7

2

14

29

17

5

30

33

18

32

15

29

7

26

19

19

6

26

3

23

22

16

19

6

2

25

30

34

29

33

31

13

31

14

19

4

5

28

35

13

15

29

35

35

1

28

8

18

9

26

28

2

[Shorty]

Set 3 - RNG. (2 units)

[winkel]

This is guesswork.

Where are the hints that show you to be RNG or actual?
How do you identify them?

br
winkel

[Mr Chips]

Winkel,
 
As far as I am concerned it's not guesswork, I do apply a certain methodology and consider certain other factors as well. I would not say it's
perfect, but then I don't have a system that wins on every occasion either.
 
The test has just started and what I would find helpful is examining a group of PRNG numbers which Tangram will produce at some point.
 
Mr Chips

[Mr Chips]

Tangram,
 
Set 3 is tricky, as at the moment I can't progress past 50:50. 0 is the sleeper in this group, did you forget to program it  I don't
rely on such considerations, but having arrived at a 50:50 from my usual method I then look for further clues.
 
If it's ok with you I will delay a decision on set 3 and move on to set 4.
 
Mr Chips

[Tangram]

No problem Mr Chips, make your decision when you're ready.

did you forget to program it

Ah, now that would be a clue wouldn't it. 

Set #1 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90%   
Set #2 (Actuals) identified as Actuals with DOC 70% 
Set #3 - decision deferred

Set #4

5

12

32

3

17

33

9

18

36

35

29

30

15

24

11

2

35

33

28

8

0

33

25

36

15

19

7

11

10

9

1

28

27

29

23

15

32

34

19

5

2

4

6

7

15

0

24

20

18

29

10

4

20

35

4

29

33

33

1

36

12

1

19

2

18

25

21

30

25

9

31

13

22

15

6

12

9

9

36

14

32

9

21

22

2

35

14

11

8

33

30

13

36

36

19

18

4

14

27

32

33

25

34

10

6

3

27

35

23

23

8

34

20

36

13

0

26

2

30

13

27

19

11

25

24

3

33

17

13

26

5

17

17

17

33

7

26

15

10

18

0

18

35

33

26

20

29

27

6

27

1

28

1

18

11

15

22

16

4

0

11

5

20

32

25

11

8

15

10

3

17

7

21

13

33

32

21

18

16

28

20

33

1

34

19

0

30

10

35

17

6

11

13

33

4

17

27

5

18

20

1

3

19

24

32

16

24

9

15

9

26

32

30

22

3

17

13

5

15

29

2

2

34

23

1

17

13

19

5

11

28

31

18

14

[Mr Chips]

Set 4 = actuals DOC 60%
 
Mr Chips

[Tangram]

Set #1 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90%   
Set #2 (Actuals) identified as Actuals with DOC 70%   
Set #3 - decision deferred
Set #4 (PRNG) identified as Actuals with DOC 60% 


Set #5

17

33

25

24

33

16

2

10

35

2

18

25

34

24

19

30

31

28

10

34

14

20

7

29

18

32

8

3

28

30

35

22

34

12

3

10

34

4

17

31

9

28

34

34

13

30

36

20

35

2

6

15

23

10

6

32

33

13

28

17

20

36

22

18

21

14

6

34

16

17

18

26

1

18

28

13

17

10

23

22

22

26

8

24

36

2

2

12

18

26

21

11

6

20

26

31

27

1

6

23

12

24

22

1

2

20

28

15

28

31

19

12

26

23

18

5

7

17

24

19

19

21

4

33

15

19

32

21

2

24

23

11

8

30

6

33

8

12

29

32

6

29

12

29

4

13

18

30

6

26

19

18

18

27

20

4

33

30

26

31

13

22

35

34

34

18

17

20

16

27

30

31

30

3

24

29

6

27

9

6

12

14

35

34

27

31

36

18

1

30

32

36

15

15

32

1

7

22

15

18

20

17

2

9

28

20

11

28

18

35

18

5

19

25

23

32

36

12

13

8

24

18

19

21

8

20

16

21

12

10

19

17

5

13

[Mr Chips]

Tangram,

On this occasion I don't mind being wrong. My methodology told me PRNG hence the 60% DOC and the other clues came on the side
of actuals. So I'm pleased my methodology proved correct. The other clues certainly mirrored actuals in many respects.

I should really have asked you for a couple of examples of your PRNG before the test, but at least I have got an example now.

This will be a very interesting test for me, as I have done a bit of research some time ago and some PRNG appear easier to identify
than others and if your PRNG proves a tough nut to crack, it will greatly enhance my research.
 
Cheers
 
Mr Chips

[Mr Chips]

Set 5 = PRNG DOC 90%

[Tangram]

Sorry Mr Chips   

set #5 was actuals. Maybe you'll put on a spurt in the final furlong. 

I should really have asked you for a couple of examples of your PRNG before the test, but at least I have got an example now.

We can always carry on, no need to stop at 10 sets. It's a good RNG though. 

Set #1 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90%   
Set #2 (Actuals) identified as Actuals with DOC 70%  
Set #3 - decision deferred
Set #4 (PRNG) identified as Actuals with DOC 60% 
Set #5 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90% 

Set #6

26

26

1

24

13

21

5

6

9

27

1

16

10

12

10

15

34

34

24

8

18

29

36

24

9

14

14

4

28

34

23

32

11

36

31

16

12

15

23

23

17

21

2

13

12

29

34

2

33

7

16

29

35

32

4

0

14

7

30

21

7

34

7

22

6

1

15

4

13

24

7

1

6

3

22

24

23

4

15

35

18

1

1

14

1

35

11

0

29

16

9

25

21

11

20

0

25

24

27

14

30

13

24

14

9

18

32

25

20

30

7

29

11

25

22

10

23

[Mr Chips]

Tangram,
 
Same result as set 1 with  DOC of 90%, I certainly wouldn't place bets on that Table
 
When I get to set 10 I will see if I can make any sense of the results.
 
Mr Chips

[Tangram]

Bravo! 

Set #1 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90%    
Set #2 (Actuals) identified as Actuals with DOC 70%   
Set #3 - decision deferred
Set #4 (PRNG) identified as Actuals with DOC 60%   
Set #5 (Actuals) identified as PRNG with DOC 90%   
Set #6 (PRNG) identified as PRNG with DOC 90%   

Set #7

15

7

24

24

16

9

34

24

9

11

31

20

36

20

6

23

19

8

31

4

12

5

7

10

10

34

11

25

16

30

24

2

19

23

31

27

16

24

24

1

9

34

21

8

16

28

13

11

26

8

10

16

35

13

21

34

26

18

36

25

20

9

26

15

6

14

13

16

0

36

27

1

29

5

28

11

18

7

0

13

29

18

25

35

22

32

33

18

6

28

20

34

7

1

22

28

14

27

19

20

21

36

2

12

12

10

36

5

12

14

32

19

14

22

6

29

14

8

23

28

33

0

0

20

5

35

21

8

22

9

0

16

31

5

23

10

33

9

15

0

8

36

6

27

12

11

14

5

8

12

9

26

26

18

28

24

30

26

1

12

3

35

27

3

33

27

7

1

13

34

15

6

6

20

36

22

23

1

23

10

9

6

1

4

11

25

6

0

14

2

35

14

28

23

11

21

19

25

14

23

27

21

18

25

3

36

18

24

29

35

1

28

23

5

28

14

11

34

2

9

10

26

34

8

1

28

0

31

9

6

3

30

35

19

[Tangram]

-