Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

E.C testing

Started by MATTJONO, June 15, 2009, 02:21:13 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

See_Jerek

Hello 6,

I agree with you totally,this system is worth a punt if you play big units like $10 seems worthwhile.
How much BR do you reckon is enough for a session?


See_Jerek

Hello Matt,

You got the man,Number 6 is one of the more innovative guys around.sometimes his systems are so deep till I can't understand.I am sure he can refine this to a higher level.

I like flat betting,I truly do as its low risk and keeps the BR safe most of the time.Any form of progression can kill,sometimes faster sometimes slower.lol

northa

What positive progression are you guys using?
I am doing ok testing by flat betting - 240 spins +22units
Would like to try a progression to compare.

MATTJONO

Quote from: northa on June 27, 2009, 07:17:24 AM
What positive progression are you guys using?
I am doing ok testing by flat betting - 240 spins +22units
Would like to try a progression to compare.



It seems your getting around the +1 units on average per 10 spins.  :thumbsup:

try this below northa  
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/marven's-5-level-staking-plan/

MATTJONO


P.S I deposited £5 on betfred this morning I tracked and then I place £1 on B, £1 on O, £1 on high, (looking at the trends it seemed like a good 1st bet)
anyway the number spun in was 29 BLACK ODD and in the HIGH section. So I won my first bet and am on £8.09p I logged off with my +£3. ( ill see what happens later)





Number Six

Jerek, thanks for the compliment. Often I don't understand myself either  :girl_wacko:

High value units, yes. I gave it whirl last night, only with £2 units to start and gain some confidence in the method. Then I played a second session with £5 units. I managed a £55 profit, but it was quite a long grind and in the end I got bored. The BR graph shows that it's up and down all the time and climbs very slowly. I'm working on a way of profit protection, to minimise the more destructive slumps.

Coxx16

has anyone tried the 6 point divisor plan?

Number Six

I have finished testing the aggressive variant of the smart way against 1000 Spielbank spins. The results are contained in reply 20 on page 2.

There were some bad sessions, some average and some very good. Even the sessions where the hit rate was less than 45% produced acceptable exit points at around +10u. Good runs are inevitable where one or two, or sometimes three, series dominate and you get a lot of double and triple wins close together. With Marven's up as you win staking plan, these good runs will escalate the BR and even with an overall poor hit rate you can still get out in profit.

Flat betting with the aggressive variant is not possible. Some sort of postive progression has to be used. Marven's plan is lethal at times...see the result for session 10 (lots of triple wins netting +15u). But it is also damaging to the BR when the hits dry up. Anywhere around +20-30 is a good exit point. +10 should be taken if the session is going badly. It's imperative to quit after the good run, or as soon as you get to the +20 range. I wouldn't say that is a hit and run strategy. It is merely quitting with some, or an adequate, profit. It is not getting greedy and being happy with small and sustainable wins. I feel there will always be times where the balance is positive, these moments may not last long or they may last very long, either way they are the exit windows.

I may go back and try to strengthen the in-game strategy. OR, I will work on a more suitable staking plan, such as a modified Paroli/Parley - this cannot be played with a negative progression or a divisor. A divisor simply won't work because the hit rate will never be high enough. It has to be up as you win...hit that good run and then quit.

Anyway, that is my take on the smart way so far.

MATTJONO

great results number6 and session 10 well what can i say hopefully we will get a thew of these amazing sessions and hardly any sessions ending in a minus bankroll.

I have to say you have made this system the way it is now the staking plan surly makes a difference.

mattjono


p.s by the way i got my £5 to £41 at one point during the weekend (i only collect if i reach £100). anyway i got down from £40 to £3.20p and said o.k looking at the smart way and what was happening patterns ect. £2 on red £20p on 0 and £1 on street 10,11,12 and after a very long minute spun in RED, EVEN, LOW number 12  and i was now on £18 and another 30 mins it was gone. BUT HAY IT WAS ALL FUN £5 COULD MAKE ME RICH ONE DAY  ;D.


Number Six

Well, I think the aggressive way is actually not at all different to the original way you outlined. I only decided to bet every opportunity to stave off a lot of tracking in between these triggers. I expect the hit rates from boths ways would be very similar. The staking plan does make a difference. It is really lethal sometimes. Problem is, the larger drawdowns come with it also. I've had fun testing it and I have played it once for real money. I think for a mechanical bet it has promise and could be improved to become the basis of a nice little strategy.

vix

Mattjono did you give up on this idea? I see you're having more succes with testing sectors at the moment...

Vix

MATTJONO

Quote from: vix on July 09, 2009, 05:03:42 AM
Mattjono did you give up on this idea? I see you're having more succes with testing sectors at the moment...

Vix


hi Vix

well the enjoyment factor rearly does need to be involved when playing roulette or the  :diablo:  may take over. (for me anyway)

but I can say that im glad I did the testing of this E.C the smart way and im sure it will come in handy in the future when im playing with £10 units maybe  ;D

thanks,
mattjono

MATTJONO

-