A test of Mr J's "Two's Company" system.

[Mr J]

Even if it does Sam, you know we will hear the same arguements from "the other folks". Myself, I have played this method LIVE 31 times. 12 of the 31 have been skipping a spin 10 times, as in my last rule change. My results are very nice and are getting noticed too much. I usually sit next to the wheel and a couple times, floor actually came over and looked under the wheel cause my leg is always way under there, I really stretch out when I sit. Its a bit funny. Ken

[bombus]

Ken

My pleasure.  If this thing makes it through the Zuma Tester, it will be the only system I know of that has!

Sam

I hope it makes it through the Zuma, Sam.

If it does, it will be the second system I'm aware of to do so... both using up as you lose progessions BTW.

[TwoCatSam]

Bombus

I don't suppose you'd care to share who's on first?

Sam

[Mr J]

I would never ask that. Then it looks like I care.  Ken

[bombus]

Bombus

I don't suppose you'd care to share who's on first?

Sam

Yes, that's right............lol.


----------------------------------------------

Mr J's right, who cares if 100 systems beat the zumma tester.  Knowing might help with future system  development, but it wouldn't have any bearing on your current system test at all.
I'd like to see a flat betting method beat it though...even so, the zumma tester being a bit old and all, 15000 spins is not a lot in this day and age of computer testing.

[TwoCatSam]

I care because of this fact........

Any system which was not reverse engineered to fit the Zuma is a winning system until proven otherwise.  (My opinion only!)

Right now I am not so concerned as to IF the "Two's Company" system works; I believe it does.  I am more concerned as to why, and if any two numbers selected at random at the beginning of the trot would work just as well.

Sam

[bombus]

I care because of this fact........

Any system which was not reverse engineered to fit the Zuma is a winning system until proven otherwise.  (My opinion only!)

Right now I am not so concerned as to IF the "Two's Company" system works; I believe it does.  I am more concerned as to why, and if any two numbers selected at random at the beginning of the trot would work just as well.

Sam

It's a very interesting point you make, Sam.

Everyone will tell you it's all about the selection process, and the progression is just a tool to help ride out the bad times.

I suspect the two are more closely related than that.

For the record, the other system I know of that beat the zuma has a similar bet selection premise... that being it jumps about the place... I call it shunting, and I like to think of 37/38 train tracks to run on, and the system shunts the train from one track to another.

Just picking two random numbers will work almost as well, but I think Two's Company's use of the current wheel history would push it slightly ahead of the random numbers... and any push along is good in this game.

Thoughtfully shunting your selection + long progression makes it very hard for the wheel to beat you. Problem is, when it does beat you it's expensive...a right bloody train smash!

Cheers.

[Mr J]

Any 2 numbers? I as well have played MANY 2 number methods with the SAME progression etc. This method gets much better results and in the long term BUT it shouldn't. This has been my POINT for well over 7 years. Not all methods (bet selection) and not all progressions are the same. Why? I have no idea, I ONLY know this through trial and error, nothing more.  Ken

[TwoCatSam]

Ken

I will be quite happy to make money using this system and never know how or why it works.  Actually it is heartening to know that something does not have to follow the laws of logic to work.

Sam

[Mr J]

Yep, good point sir.  Ken

[bombus]

Right now I am not so concerned as to IF the "Two's Company" system works; I believe it does. I am more concerned as to why, and if any two numbers selected at random at the beginning of the trot would work just as well.

Sam

Ken

I will be quite happy to make money using this system and never know how or why it works.  Actually it is heartening to know that something does not have to follow the laws of logic to work.

Sam

Now I'm confused...

[hoper35]

That was the plan. 

[TwoCatSam]

Don't know how or why--not accusing anyone--but my answer to bombus disappeared.

bombus

I would like to know how the system works, but if I never do that's fine. 

I have been on lucky streaks so many times and mistook them for a grail.  I'd like to know why a system works so I could know I'm not just on a lucky streak.  However, if I never learn why something works, but it does, that's good enough for me.

Sam

[bombus]

Ok Sam.
Fair enough, mate.

Good luck with your testing.

[Rebirtha]

Does the test on 500,000 spins use logarithms?

[Rebirtha]

-