Testing CD - 5 line system

[MattyMattz]

Hey gang,

I am going to start testing Chicken Dinner's 5 line system.  Will be using the parameters that he mentioned in his thread.  Aim for 10% of BR, if down 25%, aim for breakeven, stop of 50% loss. 

I'll be using the 50% MM Plan (surprised?).  Results will be posted below.  I'm hoping to use this in conjuction with my 5 lines, as it can be a long wait. 

Cheers,
Matt

[hamsup_sotong]

good luck buddy


Cheers
Hams

[ChickenDinner]

Good luck Matt. It'll be interesting to see how your test results compare to the success I've had with it so far.

Cheers,
CD

[MattyMattz]

thanks CD,

just working out my unit value.  Looking at something along the lines of:

BR 100-199 units 1 and 3
BR 200-299 units 2 and 6
etc.

these will hopefully keep the number of bets low enough to reach the goal quickly.  Would hate to be betting 1 unit and trying to achieve 60 or so units... would take a while.

MM

[ChickenDinner]

Hi Matt,

Yes - that will work, base unit value at 1% of BR (rounded down) and the progression bet at 3 times the base unit value.

Cheers,
CD

[cps10]

thanks CD,

just working out my unit value.  Looking at something along the lines of:

BR 100-199 units 1 and 3
BR 200-299 units 2 and 6
etc.

these will hopefully keep the number of bets low enough to reach the goal quickly.  Would hate to be betting 1 unit and trying to achieve 60 or so units... would take a while.

MM

Matt - does that mean that when you lose the 1 unit bet (5 units total) that the 3 is for 3 units per line (15 total)?

And 2 = 10 units; 6 = 30 units?

[MattyMattz]

Yep - spot on cps.

Matt

[xman1970]

Nice1 Chicken Dinner [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

looks like an interesting way to play while waiting for another system to "qualify"

Cheers....[smiley=beer.gif]

[MattyMattz]

early testing show's some promise, but it's frustrating when you get a LL then claw your way back to even, then LL happens again... and the cycle keeps repeating.  But, I will say I haven't had much losses with this yet, just not many wins either.

Cheers,
Matt

[Clint]

I tested this using the previous six spins and had more success. Random luck I know, but in 150 spins I came out 56 units ahead. The original system, -14 units. Will test again later.

Example

[table=,]
Spin#,Street
26,5
35,6
21,4
13,3
15,3
8,2
[/table]

Bet Dbl Street 5,6,4,3,3,2. Next 6 spins are

[table=,]
Spin#,Street,win/loss
18,3,win
26,5,win
16,3,win
30,5,win
32,6,win
3,1,win
[/table]

Regards

Clint

PS Tried to post this correctly in a table but hasn't worked?

[TwoCatSam]

[escape]

Clint, do this.

[table=,]
This,is,my,heading,
this,is,my,number,
1,2,3,4
[/table]

[/escape]

It will look like this:

[table=,]
This,is,my,heading,
this,is,my,number,
1,2,3,4
[/table]

Sa,

[Clint]

Thanks Sam, where would we all be without you mate.

Clint

[ChickenDinner]

I just ran 282 spins, played continously. If I play the 2 step progression, I come out 6 units in profit, if I play a 3 step (5 x 1, 5 x 3, & 5 x 9), I come out 14 units in profit. Not great, but at least the sucker won something and never looked in danger of losing much. Maybe a new angle on the progression could increase winnings though.

Cheers,
CD

[MattyMattz]

I've started playing/testing with the pluscoup idea.  It's showing some possiblities.

[Natural9]

Pluscoup can sometimes be dangerous as well all know if good bet selection could be good tho

[Natural9]

-