winwithmath beat every event test result sharing

[lucky_strike]

but why sometime you bet that 0 become -1 and after that 0 become 1

Its like trying to find the key to the solution no one has because you can't out guess 50/50.

LS

[lucky_strike]

Its like trying to find the key to the solution no one has because you can't out guess 50/50.

There will allways be some one that claims he can and argue but there will never be some one that can show you how.

LS

[lucky_strike]

There will allways be some one that claims he can and argue but there will never be some one that can show you how.

This is a never ending story.

LS

[lucky_strike]

This is a never ending story.

Ask Gizmo or Spike

LS

[kompressor]

Its like trying to find the key to the solution no one has because you can't out guess 50/50.

LS

its like when you're on the last step of an even chance progression...you feel like an idiot....but this system is flat betting and have money management....a good package for a casino trip (for fun or course  )

[lucky_strike]

This means that you try to find a honest way to win and break even for as long as you can and have fun.
One good start is to try to stop playing when you are ahead, every time and when you don't you try to break even.

This way you will have less worries and you will become a true happy winner at all times, even if you hit a loss limit.

LS

[lucky_strike]

kompressor we can start a study group if you want?

LS

[kompressor]

quit on the top of the wave....but you never know how high the wave will be....and how deep the next will go

[hlkhoo]

Kompressor,
No worries! Whether I'm his grandson or not it doesn't matter.   
Your post is outright wrong and that's why I'm telling you are not correct.
Don't get me wrong, I'm don't come here to prove who's right or wrong.
I just post the facts.
With this method, after some 3000 shoes simulation, you still come out ahead
and if I were to average out, each shoe you probably making around 100dollars in each shoes.
Let's not forget, on a bad run, you could end up say 8 to 10 consecutive losing days before any wins is recorded.  Well, one can certainly raise his bet unit i. e.  to say 500 a unit and have a higher winning.  The question here, can he or she withstand the 10 days losing session when shit happens.
Anyway, my test was based on continuous testing and this may not reflect the true simulation on actual play in the casino.  In real life, you dont play 3000 shoes one after another!
So, as far as my testing goes, I can only share with you up to this point.  In order to do a real simulation as close as casino play, I will have to write a program to pick random shoes but I just don't have the time yet!

[kompressor]

but why sometime you bet that 0 become -1 and after that 0 become 1
 
   

In this situation:

b
b  1
r   0 <-- here it is 0, but it was 1 before so you would be betting that it will go back to 1
r   1 <-- Win

In this situation:
b
r  -1
r   0 <-- here it is 0, but it was -1 before so you would be betting that it will go back to -1
b  -1<-- win



hlkhoo...that's what i was doing incorrectly ??

[hlkhoo]

but why sometime you bet that 0 become -1 and after that 0 become 1

Redhot certainly has the best explanation.  I suggest you read his post again and pay attention to the statement "back & forth motion".  That's the key.
I don't think I can explain any better than his.

[Spike]

Wendel says he's back from his 'other house'. A couple years ago he claimed to own half a town and a waterfall in upstate NY. Its amazing what you can own on the internet even if you're a halfwit moron..

[Herb]

James, you don't understand.  Viper5, and Murph have already given us the holy grail. 

[Boo_Ray]

James, you don't understand.  Viper5, and Murph have already given us the holy grail. 

LOL herb thanks to remind us!
I almost forgot

[winwithmath]

Hi Redhot and hlkhoo
I see you have the system down to playing the right way. Good going.Don't mind the two that don't understand it's because they are just another spike like on the G.G  which I call people like that stone age thinking. Anyhow nice work I did good to teach you well.

Your friend
winwithmath

James Albert Wendel

[winwithmath]

-