Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

16 number special system not lost (YET)

Started by MATTJONO, October 27, 2008, 11:42:07 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

roules

Quotebut say you get 35,23,35

Although according to the original idea (post 1) you bet the 2nd last number hit - so for this example it would be a win (35 is the 16th number). Sorry if I sounded picky but just wanted to point that out. If it were say 35 23 12 then yes that is 3 misses. Not sure if people are playing/testing etc with this in mind. I forgot initially so I'm now in the habit of just running with 15 numbers but like Matt said - it can be handy doing this.

@ see_jerek - cheers for the xl sheet

I'm up over 800 units in less than 3 hours play (2 sessions - 50c play). Continuous play - no waiting for x misses, something I'm inclined to do after hitting the last (step 5) progression again. Would love to know how this would perform in continuous mode over say 1000+ spins (ok yes I am making a case for cont. play now  ::) but of course this isn't overly safe yet)


Roules

roules

Quote from: see_jerek on November 07, 2008, 06:19:25 AM
Quote from: petquesha on November 06, 2008, 05:33:43 PM
Sorry,this is the progresssion:
1-28
2-17
3-11
4-9
5-7
6-6
7-5
8-4
9-4
10-4
11-3
12-3
13-3
14-2
15-2


Regards petquesha

You command my highest respect!My ultimate goal in life is to become like you.I know people are laughing at me and telling me to wake up from my dream,but I know people like you exist in the world and suck money out of casinos for your own pleasure.I am working hard towards my ultimate goal but up till this stage I still belong to the loser's group.The only reason why I have to stick to my desk from 8 to 5 is to make money try systems and able to effort to lose until I can find a way to win constantly.

I have to admit I am not in the league of top management but I am still a middle management manager and for my job you need to be at least a graduate,I head a small team of 10 staff.I tell you I farking hate my job.I wanna play roulette for a living not to be rich but at least I don't have top drag mtself to work everyday and have more free time to do myn own things.

Anyway all these is besides the point,I don't understand how your system and progression works.Mate,I think your system deserves some merit and you should start a thread on it and we can learn from there,after all this thread is still on mattjono's system.How does that sound?

Mr J - a.k.a the progression lunatic has a similar method (I think the difference is he waits for the last two unhit numbers). Do a search it should be around here somewhere. Good on you for the above comments too, I'm in a similar boat.

Roules

See_Jerek

Quote from: roules on November 07, 2008, 10:23:24 AM
Quotebut say you get 35,23,35

Although according to the original idea (post 1) you bet the 2nd last number hit - so for this example it would be a win (35 is the 16th number). Sorry if I sounded picky but just wanted to point that out. If it were say 35 23 12 then yes that is 3 misses. Not sure if people are playing/testing etc with this in mind. I forgot initially so I'm now in the habit of just running with 15 numbers but like Matt said - it can be handy doing this.

@ see_jerek - cheers for the xl sheet

I'm up over 800 units in less than 3 hours play (2 sessions - 50c play). Continuous play - no waiting for x misses, something I'm inclined to do after hitting the last (step 5) progression again. Would love to know how this would perform in continuous mode over say 1000+ spins (ok yes I am making a case for cont. play now  ::) but of course this isn't overly safe yet)


Roules

The spread sheet is a great help to me,it helps me know where to place the bets quickly.I hope it helps you too.As for plying right from the start without waiting it seems to work as well I think.It will be good if you get wins quickly before you hit a loss and it greatly reduce waiting time,I am toying with the idea of waiting for 2 misses before starting to bet,at least we can go 2 steps further,what do you think?

luke0407

'ryan08 is my gay partner' - brilliant! Glad you guys could get together! together you could create the Holy Grail!

i am loving this system, i've been playing using the Hamburg spins and roulette xtreme as my aid. I'm using the idea of hit and run, i play for 100 spins and stop (completing a progression if one occurs on 100) i am waiting for 5 misses and using the progression 1/2/3/6/12/22;

100 spins - +72
100 spins - +160
102 spins - +88
100 spins - +44
100 spins - +86
100 spins - +34
100 spins - +120
100 spins - +62
100 spins - +84
105 spins - +44
100 spins - +68
100 spins - +102
100 spins - +74
100 spins - +96
106 spins - +54
100 spins - +44
100 spins - +82
24 spins - -736
100 spins - +120
100 spins - +116
100 spins - +66
100 spins - +72
100 spins - +48
103 spins - +62
100 spins - +82

total = +1144

i have to say i think this is a fantastic set of results! i know it can go bang - in fact my loss came after very few spins - but after close to 2,500 spins and what others have done i dont think (he says) that anyone has slated this system saying it doesn't work over the long term??

in fact before i get carried away with the rent, food and gas money (see general thread from LS for reference  :D) can someone come and PROVE to me that this doesn't produce good results long term. Please if yuo are to do this, do it with fact, evidence of coding or something, not just "it's gambler's fallacy" (as i dont believe it is!) or some other rubbish!

Thanks guys and keep testing!!

Luke

roules

Yes the spreadsheet will help in getting bets down - when playing at Dublinbet you can just click on the "number & neighbours" and it will select three at a time.

I'm a bit cautious of waiting only two spins - I think it's either play continuously and hope for the best or wait for at least 4 losses. More tests and time will tell. Waiting is the safe way of course, but if you hit a loss that's a lot of waiting to "re-build" your bankroll. Continuous play rakes in the wins fast and at least for some of the tests so far have shown that they can take a loss or two and still be way in front because it takes advantage of winning streaks too. Another idea I had was playing after a Win. This sank at 32 Vegas the other day - for some reason the system works a lot better at Dublin

The Spiders Kiss

HI folks...
I have been playin this system for 7 days now at Joyland as they kindly gave me £10 for free!! I wait for 5 misses and then bet as per the first shown progression.
I only bet 1p per number(yeah yeah big spender I know  ;) ) and so far i have more than doubled my BR to £22.79 as we speak.
Have hit progression 5 only once and rest have mostly been 1's and 2's.
Seems to be working ok.
Will keep you guys informed.

facu_portla

Hi mates!

Look, I've been testing 4Selecta in 32Vegas but didn't work out with me yet although I may try it a little bit more, but when I started reading this Method it really got my attention.

After reading it I've found something interesting that "Roules" said about Cointinuous playing. I've been taking a look at all the numbers and just think this:

As you can see, most of the times when you bet to the L.N. and his 7 neighbours you win in the first bet, sometimes in the second and sometimes in the third, etc. But most of the times you hit it on the first bet. So, Just think about betting always 1 chip per number to those 16 numbers on the L.N., continuously, if you lose, then bet again 1 chip to those 16 numbers of the new L.N. that came out. Try this! I've trying this and I've got great results.

I think that quiting when you are near 100 chips it's the best. Remember that 100 chips are okey per session and remember also that you set the chip value you want to play with.

Hope to hearing from you mates!

Facu.

Gaza001

Quote from: facu_portla on November 07, 2008, 11:16:46 PM
Hi mates!

Look, I've been testing 4Selecta in 32Vegas but didn't work out with me yet although I may try it a little bit more, but when I started reading this Method it really got my attention.

After reading it I've found something interesting that "Roules" said about Cointinuous playing. I've been taking a look at all the numbers and just think this:

As you can see, most of the times when you bet to the L.N. and his 7 neighbours you win in the first bet, sometimes in the second and sometimes in the third, etc. But most of the times you hit it on the first bet. So, Just think about betting always 1 chip per number to those 16 numbers on the L.N., continuously, if you lose, then bet again 1 chip to those 16 numbers of the new L.N. that came out. Try this! I've trying this and I've got great results.

I think that quiting when you are near 100 chips it's the best. Remember that 100 chips are okey per session and remember also that you set the chip value you want to play with.

Hope to hearing from you mates!

Facu.
I've been testing always 1 chip per number to those 16 numbers continuously, and lost
runing 7000 numbers on roulette xtreme I think that quiting when you are near 50 chips
thanks Jerek
The chart helps me a lot

See_Jerek

Quote from: Gaza001 on November 08, 2008, 05:33:24 PM
Quote from: facu_portla on November 07, 2008, 11:16:46 PM
Hi mates!

Look, I've been testing 4Selecta in 32Vegas but didn't work out with me yet although I may try it a little bit more, but when I started reading this Method it really got my attention.

After reading it I've found something interesting that "Roules" said about Cointinuous playing. I've been taking a look at all the numbers and just think this:

As you can see, most of the times when you bet to the L.N. and his 7 neighbours you win in the first bet, sometimes in the second and sometimes in the third, etc. But most of the times you hit it on the first bet. So, Just think about betting always 1 chip per number to those 16 numbers on the L.N., continuously, if you lose, then bet again 1 chip to those 16 numbers of the new L.N. that came out. Try this! I've trying this and I've got great results.

I think that quiting when you are near 100 chips it's the best. Remember that 100 chips are okey per session and remember also that you set the chip value you want to play with.

Hope to hearing from you mates!

Facu.
I've been testing always 1 chip per number to those 16 numbers continuously, and lost
runing 7000 numbers on roulette xtreme I think that quiting when you are near 50 chips
thanks Jerek
The chart helps me a lot

Hello mate,

Are you playing the original method or with some modifications?

Maybe you can give some examples with spins on how you are betting,so that it is clear and everybody understand how your tests are done,we don't want anyone to bet and lose money on this system isn't it?

Ryan has played a lot on this system even with a few losses,he is still positive so I guess this system does have some merit.I am playing it as well,hit losses also but wins able to cover.

It is good to see there is much interest in this thread.Credit must be given 1st to Mattjono next Ryan08 for playing long periods to test this system.I hope more people can come forward and give it a try and make some positive suggestions and improvement to make it even more profitable and safe.

This stuff is not bad and easy to play even if you are not playing at dublinbet,my spread sheet does help to help you to track the 7 neighbours and place bets fast enough.

See_Jerek

I don't know its just my luck or what,I lose the 1st bet right after the 1st 5 miss I encounter!
What luck! :'(

roules

Where were you playing? Not that it matters so much I guess. It just seems more stable at Dublinbet for some reason than it does at the playtech wheel (bet365 32vegas etc). Anything is possible in this game.

17black

Hi Jerek and fellow punters,

following on from my earlier post the position of numbers on the wheel has nothing to do with the success of this system which I atttribute to the quantum of numbers bet and the staking plan. I have had the same success in testing by just following the numeric pattern of numbers as they appear.

The following sequence of numbers gives rise to a bet on a numeric basis , following the appearance of 13, as each number spun to that point from number 30 is more than seven numbers (in a numeric sense) either side of the last number spun and this has been the case for five spins in a row.

30
21 + 9
6 + 15
14 + 8
23 + 9
13 - 10
17  -Start betting 7 either side of 13 - that is numbers 6 to 20 inclusive - and win.

When calculating the gap either side for example from 36 - continue to count forward as well as backwards with the first number forward being zero

Cheers fpor now

Gaza001

HI everone,

BEEN WORKING HARD TO TRY AND GET THIS CODED UN RX, BUT I CAN NOT GET IT TO WAIT
4 OR 6 SPINS.
Can anyone think OF A PROGRESSION LIKE 1,2,3,5,10,20,??.??,??,??,??,??
12 STEP PROGRESSION
JUST 4 PROGRAMMING AND TEST

Hi Jerek

playing the original method but i can't get rx to bet the last 2 numbers yet!!!
And betting, Continuous no PROGRESSION?

Just got the rx to start progressing,  (i can't get rx to wait yet so need 12 step progression)
just need more time!!!!!!!! ;)
hope this clears things up mate,
Gaza

The Spiders Kiss

hmm thats an interseting take 17black..using table numbes not wheel numbers..i knew a player who used to bet 5 table numbers OF THE SAME COLOUR either side of the winner(and the winneing number  too) and said he was quite successful..he used to bet everytime tho...no trigger :)

ryan08

@gaza 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.6/1.1/ 2/ 3/ 6/ 11/ 20/ 35/ 55 or 0.1/0.2/0.3/0.6/1.1/ 2/1 /2/ 3/ 6/11/20

ryan08

-