16 number special system not lost (YET)

[Gaza001]

@gaza, your not sad, you only get out of roulette what you put in, your a good example to people so thanks for the hard work mate, try running 1/2/3/5/10/20/35/55/75. that may come out a good result and you should be able to find a table that allows that spread,



thanks
ryan

Covering the lats 2 numbers 1/2/3/5/10/20/35/55/75.

[Gaza001]

@gaza, your not sad, you only get out of roulette what you put in, your a good example to people so thanks for the hard work mate, try running 1/2/3/5/10/20/35/55/75. that may come out a good result and you should be able to find a table that allows that spread,



thanks
ryan

NOT! covering the last 2 numbers 1/2/3/5/10/20/35/55/75.

[MATTJONO]

wow i knew this was good i just needed everyone to see so we could al tweek it together and make it the holy grail. i still havnt even started for real money yet im not working and carnt lend any. i do know that when i do start it tho i will just stick by the rules and win £1,000s then go on ladbrokes and win £100,000 i rearly do think it is possible.


HAS ANYONE MADE OVER £5,000 PROFIT YET BECAUSE I THINK SOMEONE WILL SOON...

IM VERY 

[See_Jerek]

wow I knew this was good I just needed everyone to see so we could al tweek it together and make it the holy grail. I still havnt even started for real money yet im not working and carnt lend any. I do know that when I do start it tho I will just stick by the rules and win £1,000s then go on ladbrokes and win £100,000 I rearly do think it is possible.


HAS ANYONE MADE OVER £5,000 PROFIT YET BECAUSE I THINK SOMEONE WILL SOON...

IM VERY 

Hi matt,when you mean by sticking by the rules are you referring to 5 miss or 6 miss?Nevertheless I think its possible to win with this system as the wins outweigh the losses.I do hope someone will win a few thousand units soon and I think ryan will be the 1st to do that,he has already won 2 thousand units with this at least

[Gaza001]

Hi All,
Eureka!!!!!!
I have discovered a way of monitoring this system. I've coded it in rx. It saves lots of time. Just click on the last number in the rx marquee, and it shows you all the next numbers to bet - no time wasted trying to work it out. Eg, last number that came up was number 1.  Click on number one on the marquee, and hey presto, the rest of the numbers to bet on will be shown on the table. You just copy them to the playing table. Also, if there are 4 chips showing on each number, you would have lost 4 times.  So, as Ryan waits for 6 losers, the table will show 6 on each. This would be the time to start your first progression. I'm going to post this in downloads in rx. The system is called Gaza's 15 numbers + progression. (By the way, the system seems to work well on its own). To everyone who downloads this, will you please check it for me and provide feedback.
When you have loaded it into your rx, go to "designer" open "system editor", scroll down to sentence "Where number 1 has hit each time", then look to right side of column of numbers. the numbers should be the 7 numbers on either side of number 1 on the wheel, (15 numbers in all). Then check number 2, etc, etc. Please let me know if any of these numbers are incorrect.

[The Spiders Kiss]

Hi.So is it now being said that after the trigger you should bet on the last 2 numbers and the seven either side for this to work at its best? please clarify...Btw I have now gone from £10 to £30+ using this system in 8 days.Many thanks every one this is lookin awesome.

[See_Jerek]

Guys it is defintely awesome when you win and i think its a good system too but I did lose on my 1st trigger of the 1st bet of a session.
That was 2 days ago,I am playing LWs as well together with this.I don't for for big wins,I use a BR of 2000 and try to win 10% and run lol.As for the past 2 days,i didnt get a trigger at all none zero,most of them are 4 misses and before I have a chance to bet,the LWs have already help my hit my target of 10%.maybe its just my luck nothing else

[cps10]

I wanted to put my 2 cents in regarding the continuous play. With a system such as this since you are changing up your numbers with each spin, it makes sense to play continuously. You aren't really waiting for a miss per se.

If you were betting only 16 STATIC numbers, i.e., numbers that you are monitoring for every spin, it would make sense to play this on a wait-and-see basis. Preferably, you have to figure that with the law of the third, these numbers are going to hit at least once per cycle, maybe not. But since you are looking at 12 sleepers per cycle, and betting 16, you have 4 which SHOULD hit. So, that being said, take the 37 spins and divide by 16 to get over 2.0. So, it would make sense to wait 3 spins to lose then play from there.

Does this make sense to everybody?

I like hermes' suggestion to play continuously. Since the number set you are betting is random, then you could lose right out of the gate. The loss is there waiting for you, so why not beat it to your profit goal before it reaches you?

[See_Jerek]

I wanted to put my 2 cents in regarding the continuous play. With a system such as this since you are changing up your numbers with each spin, it makes sense to play continuously. You aren't really waiting for a miss per se.

If you were betting only 16 STATIC numbers, i.e., numbers that you are monitoring for every spin, it would make sense to play this on a wait-and-see basis. Preferably, you have to figure that with the law of the third, these numbers are going to hit at least once per cycle, maybe not. But since you are looking at 12 sleepers per cycle, and betting 16, you have 4 which SHOULD hit. So, that being said, take the 37 spins and divide by 16 to get over 2.0. So, it would make sense to wait 3 spins to lose then play from there.

Does this make sense to everybody?

I like hermes' suggestion to play continuously. Since the number set you are betting is random, then you could lose right out of the gate. The loss is there waiting for you, so why not beat it to your profit goal before it reaches you?

Hi Cps10,

I partly agree with you as I am one of those that hit a loss right on the 1st bet after 5 misses.It may make sense to bet right from the start but you hit the wall easier compare to waiting for misses.I think this needs a better progression so at least we can last a few steps more if we wanna play right from the start.As an expert in progressions,is it posssible to bring in your ladder for this?Or is there any better progression you can suggest?

This system does have some merit

[cps10]

I wanted to put my 2 cents in regarding the continuous play. With a system such as this since you are changing up your numbers with each spin, it makes sense to play continuously. You aren't really waiting for a miss per se.

If you were betting only 16 STATIC numbers, i.e., numbers that you are monitoring for every spin, it would make sense to play this on a wait-and-see basis. Preferably, you have to figure that with the law of the third, these numbers are going to hit at least once per cycle, maybe not. But since you are looking at 12 sleepers per cycle, and betting 16, you have 4 which SHOULD hit. So, that being said, take the 37 spins and divide by 16 to get over 2.0. So, it would make sense to wait 3 spins to lose then play from there.

Does this make sense to everybody?

I like hermes' suggestion to play continuously. Since the number set you are betting is random, then you could lose right out of the gate. The loss is there waiting for you, so why not beat it to your profit goal before it reaches you?

Hi Cps10,

I partly agree with you as I am one of those that hit a loss right on the 1st bet after 5 misses.It may make sense to bet right from the start but you hit the wall easier compare to waiting for misses.I think this needs a better progression so at least we can last a few steps more if we wanna play right from the start.As an expert in progressions,is it posssible to bring in your ladder for this?Or is there any better progression you can suggest?

This system does have some merit

see_jerek

It is possible. When you are betting 16 numbers, flat betting isn't a real option I wouldn't think. Unless maybe you used a pluscoup, I don't know. The ladder, when slightly modified could possibly work.

[See_Jerek]

I wanted to put my 2 cents in regarding the continuous play. With a system such as this since you are changing up your numbers with each spin, it makes sense to play continuously. You aren't really waiting for a miss per se.

If you were betting only 16 STATIC numbers, i.e., numbers that you are monitoring for every spin, it would make sense to play this on a wait-and-see basis. Preferably, you have to figure that with the law of the third, these numbers are going to hit at least once per cycle, maybe not. But since you are looking at 12 sleepers per cycle, and betting 16, you have 4 which SHOULD hit. So, that being said, take the 37 spins and divide by 16 to get over 2.0. So, it would make sense to wait 3 spins to lose then play from there.

Does this make sense to everybody?

I like hermes' suggestion to play continuously. Since the number set you are betting is random, then you could lose right out of the gate. The loss is there waiting for you, so why not beat it to your profit goal before it reaches you?

Hi Cps10,

I partly agree with you as I am one of those that hit a loss right on the 1st bet after 5 misses.It may make sense to bet right from the start but you hit the wall easier compare to waiting for misses.I think this needs a better progression so at least we can last a few steps more if we wanna play right from the start.As an expert in progressions,is it posssible to bring in your ladder for this?Or is there any better progression you can suggest?

This system does have some merit

see_jerek

It is possible. When you are betting 16 numbers, flat betting isn't a real option I wouldn't think. Unless maybe you used a pluscoup, I don't know. The ladder, when slightly modified could possibly work.

Hi cps10,

I will use your approach of betting after 3 misses based on law of the third and do some tests with it.If we bring the ladder in will it be a 9 step ladder? a 9 step ladder will go high on progressions defintely

[ryan08]

@gaza, flatbet the system without waiting using rx and your live roulette spins and see what you end up with, i found something quite interesting

[darrencasino]

Just one question if that is okay...

After you wait for your 4-6 misses and make your first bet, if it doesn't come in,
are you now waiting for another 4-6 misses (like it was said in the first post) or are you
using the progression in the first set of numbers you bet?

Thanks, Darren.

[See_Jerek]

Just one question if that is okay...

After you wait for your 4-6 misses and make your first bet, if it doesn't come in,
are you now waiting for another 4-6 misses (like it was said in the first post) or are you
using the progression in the first set of numbers you bet?

Thanks, Darren.

Hi Darren,you wait for misses then you start to bet,of you lose the bet you countinue to bet but this time the 7 neighbours of the last result which is a different set of numbers,You carry on betting until you win within 6 bets or hit the wall.There are two 2 conclusions to this

[See_Jerek]

@gaza, flatbet the system without waiting using rx and your live roulette spins and see what you end up with, I found something quite interesting

I have tried RX and my views is it doesnt reflect real results but it seems to be a better bench mark if you use real spins

[See_Jerek]

-