Inevitable hits (Parachuting Framework)

[admin]

Hello guys,

Since this is the Framework Session I want to open a question regarding the "Parachuting" framework used by several spanish players: The "[highlight]Inevitable Hit[/highlight]".

They believe you can not escape to make a WIN at roulette.

When you analyze it, it makes sense, if there were a way for a player to hit less than what probability dictates at will, then it would only be matter of betting against that player to make the big bucks.


(Well, as a matter of fact, some people make psychological game and only bet against losing players for a profit at their "terminal phase", meaning when a perfect loser player has only a few units left, they bet against him, reasoning since that guy is at a losing tram, the remaining units will end up the side of the bank, so why not bet against that player to turn his negative tram into a profitable tram for oneself, but Psychological game is another history... we are into parachuting right now!).


So... parachuters make cooperative bets to make the ones with more coverage finance the ones with more risk -and bigger payout-.

Example: 2 lines + 2 splits.

The splits must hit at a rate, less often than the lines obviously, but the more frequent wins at the lines help in keeping the parachuter as close to financial balance while he waits for the BIG HIT which will jumpstart the units to a new plateau, and then the parachuter will try to stay close to it waiting for another "Inevitable" BIG HIT to make a new "upward spike" for the personal bankroll (as in a positive stockmarket  graph).

Furthermore, they select events for which only the miracle for that "reversed player" -the house- can make them lose.

Shall the attack fail, then it demands for an evolution of the bets with higher risk but more payout, for instance: 2 corner/quads + 2 straights, so when the [highlight]inevitable hit[/highlight] comes it pays more to equalize the personal balance.



What do you guys think of this methodology?

And my question for this framework thread: [highlight]Are we really bound to HIT?[/highlight]
Can you support the affirmation if yes? Can you explain why not?

This is the Gambling framework section and it applies to elaborate more and debate this type of matters.  [smiley=smiley.gif]



Parachuting is a way to gracefully "be there" for the "BIG HIT" with the higher payout to move up from the previous plateau, but it is an art. There are no two parachuters whom play the same, even though the underlying methodology is the same.

For instance, some parachuter friend of mine -A mexican currently living in USA, plays in Vegas- taught me to use up to 4 parachutes at once in a cooperative way.

This is one of those techniques I like but haven't gotten fully the gist of it. Mostly because of the tracking, since they make a lot of "equivalent events" to play only favorable statistical zones, not only for a few locations as I'm used to (I.e. lines or columns/dozens) but must notice deviations for every location of the parachute they will use, and some can range from even bets to straight-up... darn! that's a whole load of tracking.

But [highlight]if we are really bound to hit[/highlight], then making the inevitable BIG HIT profitable is worthy.

(p.s. In this methodology a BIG HIT can also mean the concentration of hits of a determined event, specially those using splits and straight-up numbers.

So this human approach shouldn't be confused with the 100% mechanical "grand parachute" progression for which only 1 hit recoups it all.

A human-based parachuter often is stuck at a level of betting for plenty of time before the "inevitable" BIG HIT –as in positive tram for the event- comes and the mental effort put in the sizing of the bets becomes worthwhile).

------------

Opinions/Comments on this welcome.

Regards.
Victor.

[admin]

they make a lot of "equivalent events" to play only favorable statistical zones, not only for a few locations

Here lies he complexity of this methodology, since the true proficient parachuter has every location of the wheel mastered.

We heard from some players: "I only play the even chances",  "I'm a dozens bettor" or "I only play straight-up numbers since they pay more", etc. etc. but the parachuter couldn't care less, he only plays the event he sees as the more convenient for the current situation on his bankroll.



I have to say: Equivalent events are a pain in the arse to track.

For instance, to give you an idea, an equivalent event to playing after 6 reds is to play 3 lines which skipped a cycle of 6 spins or the six streets which are not hit when a tram without repetition of streets come, or 9 unhit splits etc.

This is where I get lost with so many events.

If you were to mimic entering an equivalent bet such as entering a 20-spin tram with an imbalance such as 16 reds and 4 blacks, you can find equivalents in other locations and so on with any imaginable "statistical attack zone" for a given location, then you can extrapolate it to the location(s) you are playing right now to make sure the improbable (miracle event) is what saves the house for that level of your parachute and the common (and more expected) happening within your "attack zone" makes you a winner.



Ok, I only wanted to elaborate a bit on the equivalent events. Now I leave it up to you to provide some feeback regarding the core question of the thread: [highlight]Are we really bound to HIT?[/highlight]

Victor.

[gazrobbo]

in my opinion (bearing in mind im new to this and maybe nieve) you are NOT bound to win your never bound to win you may be more likly to win and it obviously works for some people but i suspect for those people its more about knowing the roulette wheel and down to idividual playing style knowing when to stop how much to make and not getting gready.

[MAX]

Hi Victor
This is a old topic which i believe has got merit.

Utilizing several parachutes and not evolving strictly according to  classic parachutes but to your box a bet on a"BIG HIT" must be eminent.

I am practicing playing these methods quiet awhile with good success.

Where can i find more information regarding parachutes to improve my methods?

Regards
MAX 

[Worm]

Max you may want to have look at Swarms section here on there forum if you havent..

[MAX]

Hi Worm

Good info on Swarm's Overflow ,but he has being so quiet the past few months.

Regards
MAX

[MAX]

-