Why choose Roulette?

[RouletteFanatic]

Seriously, if you guys are thinking of making money. Investing in forex or property or any other business would be a better choice then playing a negative expectation game. That said, why choose Roulette?

Im sure, most of you play just for the fun of it. There are people who legitimately want to make money from Roulette. Though there indeed are some ways. Wheel analysis, visual ballistics and systems where you can make a hefty profit from a lucky streak, the casino is a very VERY tough advesary. You are better off playing stocks.

So what is about Roulette?

[Kelly]

Why not do both stocks and roulette ?  I use partly the same bankroll for roulette as for stocks, that is the daytrading bankroll which is also a roulette bank roll.  The long term investments stays where they are and is only being supplied or reduced when something is overbought or oversold. Otherwise it stays.

[NS]

Good question, I agree with you. The people here wasting their time with gambling systems are better off studying the markets.

Personally, I'd take forex (I don't do stocks) over roulette anytime. I currently do both, forex and roulette advantage play, I prioritize forex though because there aren't many casino where I currently live, which means less AP opportunities.

Trading has the advantage of not having to worry about pit bosses watching you and casinos banning you for collecting numbers or being a wheelwatcher who actually wins, there's also no max table limits (theoretically).

Both games are hard work though if you intend to make money consistently. You gotta know what you're doing and be ahead of other participants.

[Nathan Detroit]

Kelly,

An excellent approach. Combined bankroll for roulette as well as trading and keeping  the long term investment  safe but under constant  review.

I am neither trading in forex  nor  day trading but  I am well invested in the market . Casino wininngs with a separate bankroll  make  up for  some currently reduced  stock dividends.   

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[Kelly]

I have for a long time been positioned (in the long term invests)  so i would have made most money if the market dropped so the long term was for 3 months only paying marginal since it kept rising way past that point where i ran out of stocks to sell that were accumulated in 2009, but the last couple of weeks has made me reach my goal for the year (long term) because of some combos of bonds and ETFs.  The day trading is only when i have the time or is not using it playing roulette.

If you can do a bit of money in your business, in the stock market, at the roulette   table  and buying small stakes in small rocketing companys (high risk invest) have a good family at home, what can one ask for more. 

Here would Ken jump in and say something about having an asian chick on the side..........

[mistarlupo]

Seriously, if you guys are thinking of making money. Investing in forex or property or any other business would be a better choice then playing a negative expectation game. That said, why choose Roulette?

Why do you think ANY business would be a better choice?

-2.7% might look not so bad compared to many other businesses.

[Mr J]

Why roulette? I like how other players at the table can not affect my play, win or lose. Other than Keno, roulette is up there as the BEST payout (35-1). Most people know that a good method is the ONLY way you will beat this game, thats quite obvious. I would be an AP (cough) fan if it was 1931 but its not 1931. You have to change with the times and the time NOW is a decent, well tested method. A large BR does not hurt. Ken

[NS]

roulette is up there as the BEST payout (35-1).

Wrong. Baccarat has a better payout because of a lower house edge. And systems, or what you call "methods" (cough), cannot make consistent profits at roulette, stop lying to people.

[Mr J]

"cannot make consistent profits at roulette" >>> lol, not true and you know it. Why continue with your BS?

"Wrong. Baccarat has a better payout because" >>> I said 'up there', I did not say thee. Thats the difference between you and me, I watch my wording, you dont. Also, for the record, what is the highest payout bacc. has? Ken

[NS]

lol, not true and you know it. Why continue with your BS?

Huh? You're the one claiming the impossible not me.

I said 'up there', I did not say thee. Thats the difference between you and me, I watch my wording, you dont.

You said "roulette is up there as the BEST payout". English isn't my native language but that sure sounds to me like saying "roulette has the best payout", and not "roulette is up there among the BEST payouts".

Oh well.

Also, for the record, what is the highest payout bacc. has? Ken

nolinks://justf**kinggoogleit.com/

[Mr J]

'Up there' means just that. Its like saying, Larry Bird is 'up there' with the best NBA players in history. A decent method is the ONLY way to beat roulette, most know this already. Some are still traveling around their country, 800 miles or so, searching for a ......'slight tilt'.    Ken

[Steve]

The edge you get from roulette (when played correctly) is far greater than something like blackjack. So why bother with blackjack? Well if you can find ideal conditions, it may be more straight-forward, but so time consuming and even then the edge is not that great.

The downsides of roulette are things like there is more to learn, things can go wrong which mean you avoid correct sectors instead of targeting. All up, roulette is by far the best. Poker is also a good option - it's more about playing your opponents than the game itself.

[NS]

'Up there' means just that. Its like saying, Larry Bird is 'up there' with the best NBA players in history.

But you didn't say that, you said "Larry Bird is 'up there' AS the best NBA player in history."

Also, I think what you meant is the highest payout, not the best payout. There's a difference.

Who needs to watch his wording?

A decent method is the ONLY way to beat roulette

Only if it targets the device with enough effectiveness to increase the accuracy enough to overcome the house edge.

Some are still traveling around their country, 800 miles or so, searching for a ......'slight tilt'.    Ken

In Ken's world of blind assumptions, roulette wheels are perfect and embody the mathematical model of the game to perfection.

The edge you get from roulette (when played correctly) is far greater than something like blackjack. So why bother with blackjack? Well if you can find ideal conditions, it may be more straight-forward, but so time consuming and even then the edge is not that great.

The downsides of roulette are things like there is more to learn, things can go wrong which mean you avoid correct sectors instead of targeting. All up, roulette is by far the best. Poker is also a good option - it's more about playing your opponents than the game itself.

Agreed.

[Mr J]

Very true Steve. I did not say to NS that you will win everytime you play. I said 35:1 is damn high and I'm NOT SURE if anything is higher? The best or highest, does NOT mean a person will win.


Baccarat Payouts

There is no getting confused with payouts in baccarat, as they are among the most straightforward in the industry.

 If the banco wins, payouts are 1:1
 If the punto wins, payouts are 1:1
 If the banco and the punto tie, payouts are 8:1  <<< Unless I'm missing something, I see nothing OVER 35:1. Ken

[NS]

Voilà, you meant the highest payout, not the "best". I see your point then.

[NS]

-