Simulation Software

[gizmotron]

Gizmotron, that's right, but is not easy for a person which did not deal with programming before. I know that some people which are into programming don't use RX, they prefer something else. But there is little choice for other people.

To get a random spin from an RNG:

on mouseUp
put random(37) into field "spins"
end mouseUp

To repeat 100 spins:

put "" into spinList
repeat with i = 1 to 100
put random(37) & ", " after spinList
end repeat
put spinList into field "spinListField"

xTalk languages make cross platform programming like source code that already has comments. You can just read it like natural language. Even the scripting language of RX is more complicated to learn. The very best xTalk environment is Runtime Revolution. You can build a graphic user interface in under one minute.

To do all that programming you must learn what an attribute is. In this case spinList is an attribute. All it does is act as a container to hold the text that makes up that list of 100 spins. Those spins are separated by a comma and one empty space for each spin. In xTalk you are not required to allocate computer memory space. All those lower functions are not necessary to write. This is a fourth generation programming language. If your goal is to write Roulette simulations then learning this language is the best, easiest, and fastest, being less work and the least lines of code to build functions. BTW, NASA uses it. Now you have inside context to base your decisions on.

[iggiv]

thank U for the info Gizmo

[xman1970]

Then everyone will know who is pretending.

Not sure about Cheese, but your pretending for sure Gizmo....

Your Internet connection must be close to "full speed" but your section remains empty.....

"I flat bet with a two tier progression" or words to that affect (I cannot find the quote) 

But on your "testing" thread with Mike you use an ACTUAL progression ??

WTF ??

You have a plaster for EVERY sore..... 

I think you got what you wanted.....

The forum "hanging on your every word"   

You even had a go at cheese for not answering a question ??

My god ?? EVERY question I have asked you, you have ignored 

the ONLY thing you are consistent in, is being inconsistent......

the 1st April has passed BTW.....

[gizmotron]

So I decided to read the book on RX scripting. It's third generation code at best.

Example of a simple interface in their example:

System "my system"
Method "main"
Begin
__While Starting a New Session
__Begin
___Input Data "Enter your starting Bankroll" to Bankroll
__End
End


Now in xTalk language

put "Enter your starting Bankroll" into field "statements"
startNewSession
-----------------------------------------

on startNewSession
 global holdBankroll
 -- this will allow you to call up your current bankroll from anything in the interface and at later times too.
 put the text of field "Bankroll" into holdBankroll
end startNewSession

RunRev automatically knows that the text can also be a value. So it logically deals with it as text "500" or it as a value 500. All you need to do is write startNewSession on a line of it's own, that's from anywhere in the software too. It will get the value you have entered in your bankroll in the interface. That's one line of code after you have that simple function written somewhere. It's almost like having automatic object oriented programming.

I hope you can see a difference and that both RX and RunRev are not too confusing.

[xman1970]

You where worth it too. 

You WERE worth it too.... MENSA boy 

& well done for staying away from those tricky questions......

[ReDsQuaD]

In my opinion, RX is a useless tool. Its blunt but its true. You can't beat an RNG, which why i believe its useless.

All testing should be evaluated on a real physical wheel.

James.

[ReDsQuaD]

RX isn't entertainment, its a powerful tool. I use it every day. It does everything for you, and does it immediately. Anyone serious about roulette has to have it, best money you'll ever spend.

It is indeed entertainment. RX is an affiliate product that get's sold on clickbank. It's just a tool to make you believe you can devise a winning strategy. The guy who is selling this knows nothing about roulette. He is just an affiliate marketer with a product.

That's it.

Cheese you have said you have used RX for some time now, and you think its the best money you'll ever spend.

I can my bet my life you are not beating RNG.

It's actually the worst thing you can spend your money on. RX Is there to waste people's time because you CANT beat RNG.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

It is indeed entertainment. RX is an affiliate product that get's sold on clickbank. It's just a tool to make you believe you can devise a winning strategy. The guy who is selling this knows nothing about roulette. He is just an affiliate marketer with a product.

That's it.

Cheese you have said you have used RX for some time now, and you think its the best money you'll ever spend.

I can my bet my life you are not beating RNG.

It's actually the wothing you can spend your money on. RX Is there to waste people's time because you CANT beat RNG.

RX CAN be used to import real spins from a real wheel.  That's what most everyone uses it for, not the worthless RNG.  You can import real spins from a real brick and mortar casino, speilbank Weisban.  That is what cheese is referring to.

[ReDsQuaD]

RX CAN be used to import real spins from a real wheel.  That's what most everyone uses it for, not the worthless RNG.  You can import real spins from a real brick and mortar casino, speilbank Weisban.  That is what cheese is referring to.

Sure, i take your point.

But most people though, believe its a piece of software that can enable them to find a winning system. I'm saying for most people, i think RX creates false hopes and endless amounts of wasted time.

[iggiv]

well, then dont blame  RX but rather roulette itself. RX just does what it does -- lets u quickly test your methods with
real spins or RNG spins. of course it can't do anything magical. But some people not using RX-- test their methods just by manual calculating, taking some spins occasionally from somewhere. Those people would save lots of effort and time by using stuff like RX. As we say it is just a tool, not more than this. If u don't know how to use a guitar or piano  u don't use it, u don't blame it for your musical inability. So the same goes for roulette tools.


and then there is one more important thing. if u did not test your method enough, but rather just a little without RX, u still put lots of effort into it (paperwork and etc). U got tired, u got frustrated, u r fed up. U went to play real money, u lost. Here u go. With RX u would test it  a lot on different wheels with relatively small effort, no paperwork, u saved your results as jpg. u lost virtually, not real money. u saved some money, and it could be a big money if this is a usual story for some people, which do a little test then go and lose.

[cheese]

Cheese you have said you have used RX for some time now, and you think its the best money you'll ever spend.

I can my bet my life you are not beating RNG.

I never play RNG, why would I when I have RX. You obviously don't have clue one as to what RX is.

[cheese]

Sure, I take your point.

But most people though, believe its a piece of software that can enable them to find a winning system. I'm saying for most people, I think RX creates false hopes and endless amounts of wasted time.

LOL!  Way too funny. You obvioulsly have no idea what RX is or what it does, yet you're an expert on it. Why are you even on this forum?

[iggiv]

RX is a big thing for a roulette player. I am not saying it will help everybody  win, but for sure it helps many people not  lose.

[ADulay]

But most people though, believe its a piece of software that can enable them to find a winning system. I'm saying for most people, I think RX creates false hopes and endless amounts of wasted time.

I don't believe that statement is true.   I think most people use RX as a testing and analysis tool, not something that will GIVE them the Holy Grail.

AD

[iggiv]

James imagine yourself in just one day or two being able to play virtually in 4-5 german casinos on lots of wheels. more than 30. 2,3,4 hours each. think about it. in real life you would spend maybe 2 weeks, maybe more. And I am not sure they would be too happy to see u clocking their wheels without placing any bets.

[iggiv]

-