THE GUY WHO HAS A GOOD SYSTEM... by New Ken

[New Ken]

We're looking at the guy (or gal, hey) who already has the (or a ) good system. Just like you, he's probably researched, studied, invented, experimented, had hope, failed, tried again, given up, restarted...the works.

Then something happened; what has historically happened in every field of study that sought a breakthrough in its endeavours...

If the guy does not exist, or cannot exist---well, it goes against history, doesn't it?

New Ken!

[Carlitos]

....... he has won 52 million ponds with roulette...... however his website looks s...!! 52 million ponds, yah right!!




Question: If you would have won 52 million ponds of roulette would you be on the Internet with that kind of an website??






Carlitos  

[Boo_Ray]

....... he has won 52 million with roulette...... however his website looks s...!! 52 million, yah right!!





Carlitos  

he also used a very expensive camera for his photos

[Carlitos]

............ could be Boo_Ray, i haven't seen them??




By the way, there is an Squirrel on the back of your head..... 



Carlitos 

[Carlitos]

............ i do not see he is selling something.......? Anyone read the whole site??





Carlitos 

[Worm]

Anyone read the whole site??

Are you crasy? Cant look at the page without getting a headake

[New Ken]

Ok, maybe I should come in here. Apparently THAT guy got people's attention. Well, why not...
But certainly, folks, if we're not going to examine something, a principle, the person offered or pointed out---why bother knocking him?

Just my view...


New Ken

[Carlitos]

52 millions ponds. Thats English ponds. About 75 million dollars i guess. He, knocks himself out...............





Carlitos 

[JHM]

Carlitos,

I posted that text not for the 52 million pounds, not for the claim that Charlie is an ex playboy.

I don't know if you have read the whole text I pasted? You're missing the main goal. It's the view on the game. Thinks he says like:

- Don't try to beat the odds, don't look at the wheel, look what's moving on the table
- If you can find a bet that continuous loses, than you have a bet that continuous wins, don't you?

I like to refresh and change my view and approach on the game continuous.

I can remember you made fun out of me when I posted my failure on G.U.T. and that I won in fun mode. But you never knew that 'fun' mode at Dublinbet is the same as real mode. Both live feed from the casino.

[New Ken]

JHM, you've got the right approach, I think. And if we could move along those lines, then we're getting closer to our ORIGINAL guy...

That rest of stuff about who's legit or not is all beside the point.

Yes, there are different ways of looking at the game---maybe winning ways!

New Ken...

[JHM]

Ken,

I was just reading old posts and found a nice post by ray. He says you have to beat randomness to beat the game.

Can we beat randomness, if so, how do we beat randomness?

To give some input on the topic:

- The doesn't stay to long at one casino
- He stays low
- He travels from casino to casino were he collects small winning which make a big winning together
- He takes his losses and leave when he is having a bad day

We'll figure this guy out Ken, than finetune him.

[New Ken]

Of course we will, JHM! Or why is everybody on the site, anyway.

Now, what if our guy has a heart and wants to share his knowledge---he's got real issues now...

He has to divulge without divulging, if you understand. He fears the casinos, possible casino "plants" on sites like these, all sorts of things.

But he'll probaly lead you midway along the road, and hope you can figure the rest.

And this has possibly happened already, or is happening...


New Ken

[Carlitos]

JHM, that 52 million ponds i read on his website was not because i read it from you. Later on in other post i saw that you also mentioned it. So i'am not critizing you because of the 52 million but i also read it on the header of his website.



I did mean not to make fun out of you about the Dublin thread you posted. However, even it may be the same i do not trust any online casino.




Carlitos 

[New Ken]

Carlitos, that  52M FIGURE got you stuck there, man? C'mon...


New Ken

[VLSroulette]

- Don't try to beat the odds, don't look at the wheel, look what's moving on the table
- If you can find a bet that continuous loses, than you have a bet that continuous wins, don't you?

This is phychological game or "the rithm method" and it is an already-walked path for several spanish players. It is claimed to work!

Basically, you look for:

- A winning player, mimic his bets (best prospect playing small ammount of numbers).
- A losing player, bet against him (best prospect are even chancers and double-dozen ones).

It is called the phychological game because you'll spot them out of their behaviour. The players will be the ones telling you at what level of their personal streak they are and you have to act like a phychologist "reading them" to lay your bets accordingly.

Also, the tweaks:

- A winning table -in the casino's eye- wiping the players while many numbers are covered, you place your chips on the portion of uncovered numbers.
- A losing table -for the casino- with few players covering a little portion of numbers, you back those numbers.

Like our fellow forumer goodhand says, the house has streaks too, and those are playable

With irregular tables/players, you do not bet. You only bet when you are sure.
With tables/players that turn non-productive as you bet, you just try to lose the least.

This is only to be applied at land-based casinos.

I can bring more info on this modality of play shall anyone be interested, but it will need translation.

Best regards,
Victor

[VLSroulette]

-