Event Betting

[Mr J]

Event betting is up there with playing furthest back (both are different), I enjoy them both. Event betting is also my reason for posting regarding getting one win in every 92 bets made (not spins). Meaning, using a 92 step progression. A couple examples of event betting would be >>> betting the next up number after every spin (30 hit so the next bet would be the 31). Keep in mind we could also SKIP spins before betting. Like, 27 spins FIRST of no up numbers, then bet. Another example of event betting....betting on a repeat number, back to back. There can be MANY examples of event betting. Any you can think of?  Ken

[Gavioli]

Hi,

here is simple way for event betting. Just bet reverse numbers that hit and their pairs, for 3, 4, 5, 6 spins. Each cycle change your numbers. If you lose after 3+4+5+6=18 spins, you lost 36 units. Then just start all over again.

Change your bet every 3, 4, 5, 6 spins, depends which reverse hit when you making selection. This is completely mechanical betting and it should be use only with flat bets. It will lose in a long run, but it is low risk method and you can use it as hit and run if you have 2 quick wins.

This events happen all the time in the game and with series of bets we can try to catch it.


Use numbers: 1 with 10, 2/20, 3/30, 11/19 , 13/31, 21/12, 23/32, 29/22. You can also use 17 with 0 if you want.

Example:

21/bet 21.12. /max 3spins, stop on win
15l
12w
3 /bet3.30 /max 3spins, stop on win
21l
26l
30w
27
26
21/bet12.21. /max 3spins, stop on win
5 l
20l
8 l
7
23/bet23.32. / we lost on 3 spins so max 4 spins, stop on win
10l
34l
22l
15l
9
31/bet31.13. / we lost on 4 spins so max 5 spins, stop on win
31w
4
7
34
19bet19.11./max 3 spins, stop on win
4 l
19w
2
21bet/12.21. /max 3 spins, stop on win
10l
30l
24l
16
24
21bet21.12  / we lost on 3 spins so max 4 spins, stop on win
6 l
3 l
33l
29l
1 /bet10.1/ we lost on 4 spins so max 5 spins, stop on win
12l
19l
8 l
27l
13l
8
35
0
14
4
22bet22.29/ we lost on 5 spins so max 6 spins, stop on win
5 l
35l
29w

Cheers

[Mr J]

UPDATE if interested >>>  So far I have only played ONE number per spin with event betting. A few examples: a back to back repeat or betting the second last number that hit or the 7 just hit...now bet the 8 etc. I also WAIT 27 spins (a reason for 27) after "the" event has happened before I start my progression. Total spins is around 125. My results from two weeks ago >> I switched from playing a back to back repeat, after a win switch to...betting the second last number that hit. Remember, track all numbers that hit, do NOT miss any. A total NET of $2,320. The spins that I won on were >> 11, 2, 7, 12, 12, 39 and 34 in that order. Seven total wins. 225 total spins, 6.5 hours. My latest win was on the 39 and the progression goes up to 92. lol Is this for everyone? A big NO on that but I thought I would still share a great day. Questions? Ken

[Mr J]

This is odd but I ASSUME its only a coincidence. I looked at my average from actual betting and testing combined, what is the average spin I get my win at. For the back to back repeat average, its at 42. For the "betting on the second last number" average, its at 59. You would think it would be around the same? Ken
 

[Mr J]

Like I said, there are MANY examples of event betting. Another one I have been testing with is....one street following the prior street. EXAMPLE: The 7 8 9 street hits and NEXT spin is the 10 11 12 street. (NOTE: after the 34 35 36 street comes the 1 2 3 street) Before I play this (with LONG progression) I do the waiting first. MEANING: I wait for a min. of 27 spins without a street doing as described above. THEN, start a 1-42 street progression. Ken

[Mr J]

My tweaking is AGAIN done and I'll be playing on Monday and/or Tuesday. I'll *switch off* between playing a repeat (back to back) and betting the following number. EXAMPLE: a 23 hit, next BET will be 24. Only betting one number, 1-92 progression. Instead of skipping 27 spins, its now 36. So thats 128 spins TOTAL. Ken

[Mr J]

I did very well with this today. NO I dont win on every visit but today was special and dont forget, only betting one number, the NET wins were kick a**!  I did get a win on spin 90 (lol). Ken

[GTPfan]

Ken,
    Whats the progression you use on this ?
    Thanks in advance

[Mr J]

Betting one number 1-92, $3,405 if I lose.

1-30 $15, 31-39 $20, 40-46 $25, 47-52 $30, 53-57 $35, 58-61 $40, 62-65 $45, 66-69 $50, 70-72 $55, 73-75 $60, 76-78 $65, 79-80 $70, 81-83 $75, 84-85 $80, 86-87 $85, 88-89 $90, 90-91 $95 and 92 $100.  Ken

[bombus]

Just for fun I ran 100000 spins through RX and then checked which number came up most often, it was number 33, which showed 2830 times, a standard deviation of 2.48.

The number least hit was 27, which showed 2603 times, a standard deviation of -1.94.

The number with the least deviation was 7, which showed 2705 times, a standard deviation of 0.04.

I then ran the same 100000 spins and told it to bet on number 33 nonstop, over and over, using Mr J's 92 step progression.

I then ran the same 100000 spins and told it to bet on number 27 nonstop, over and over, using Mr J's 92 step progression.

I then ran the same 100000 spins and told it to bet on number 7 nonstop, over and over, using Mr J's 92 step progression.

Below are the resulting balance graphs. As you can see, without an edge the progression is very costly indeed.

If you take the average of the three results, you could expect to lose $44676 per number bet.

However if you could find a way to switch the bet at any given time onto a number that is hitting slightly above the standard deviation, then you would have yourself a money making machine. 

Number 33





Number 27





Number 7

[Spike]

 if you could find a way to switch the bet at any given time onto a number that is hitting>>

And my my grandmother was a teacart, I'd have wheels. If only..

[bombus]

if you could find a way to switch the bet at any given time onto a number that is hitting>>

And my my grandmother was a teacart, I'd have wheels. If only..

A hubla, hubla... you say what??

[Mr J]

@Bombus >> I appreciate the graphs but what does this have to do with me?  Ken

[kav]

Bombus this is very interesting and educating. Thamks.

Did you wrrote the program yourself?
I don't have RX and I wonder how easy is it to program these systems. I guess it's not easy at all, since at RX they charge you as much as the programm itself to program specific systems.

[bombus]

@Bombus >> I appreciate the graphs but what does this have to do with me?  Ken

@ Mr J

Nothing to do with you in particular, but this thread is in the brainstorming section and you have supplied a pretty chunky progression, so I thought it might be useful brainstorming fodder for people to see what can happen when using such a progression.

The graphs show that if you use big negative progressions, then you really need to pick your "events" very carefully because when things go good it's really good, but when things go bad the cost can be more than prohibitive.

Bombus this is very interesting and educating. Thamks.

Did you wrrote the program yourself?
I don't have RX and I wonder how easy is it to program these systems. I guess it's not easy at all, since at RX they charge you as much as the programm itself to program specific systems.

@ kav

RX?  I'm hopeless at it, but I'll keep learning, and...one day...

The guys that charge money to code your systems are worth every cent in my books. Just think of how much they can save people in lost time (testing) and lost money (not testing).

The program itself is definitely worth buying too.

Cheers.

[bombus]

-