I was wondering if anyone had seen anything like this before?

[Norman Bates]

I THINK SOMEBODY MIGHT GET THROWN OUT BY THIS ONE!!!

"Belt Buckle"

1 chip on 2nd 12, 2nd column of 12, and numbers 1,3,4,6,7,9,10,12,17/20,25,27,28,30,31,33,34,36
2 chips on 1st 12, 1st column of 12, 3rd 12, 3rd column of twelve, and numbers 14,17,20,23
25 chips on 0, and 00
85 total
2,550 buy-in
 Now I would like to explain how my latest bet placing strategy works.  First thing I would like for you to notice is how no matter which way you add up the columns, or dozens, and conjoining inside bets it comes out to be 15 chips every time.
 Now, this is where it gets a little tricky.  Let me explain.  In the first 12, count the number of chips on the inside of that dozen.  It comes to 8 chips right?  Well, add the chips that are bet on the outside columns, and dozens that correlate with this dozen.  Those bets being the 2 chips on 1st 12, 2 chips on 1st column of 12, 2 chips on the 3rd column of 12, 1 chip bet on the 2nd column of 12, and of course, the 8 chips bet on the inside of the layout.
 Now remember, we are only working with the first dozen here. You see how these bets intersect?  It does the same thing with every column, and dozen on the layout, and all of them will add up to 15 chips total.  All of them. Guaranteed!
.  I like the name "Belt Buckle" better, because when you place all of these bets on the layout, it looks like a belt buckle, or a belt with a buckle, lol but for me, it's the perfect strategy.  The only one I dream about. .  As for the 2,550 buy-in, I just took the 85 chip total, times that by 3, added decimal point to it, and came up with the 2,550 buy-in. Also, you guys should really check this one out at the high limit tables.
Bates
                 Exercise Everyday, So that Every Day Isn't An Exercise

[pins]

if i win how much. if i lose how much.

[Norman Bates]

                                                                  "Belt Buckle"

1 chip on 2nd 12, 2nd column of 12, and numbers 1,3,4,6,7,9,10,12,17/20,25,27,28,30,31,33,34,36,0/00
2 chips on 1st 12, 1st column of 12, 3rd 12, 3rd column of twelve, and numbers 14,17,20,23
17 chips on 0, and 00
70 total
2,100 buy-in
      Now I would like to explain how my latest bet placing strategy works.   First thing I would like for you to notice is how no matter which way you add up the columns, or dozens, and conjoining inside bets it comes out to be 15 chips every time.
      Now, this is where it gets a little tricky.  Let me explain.  In the first 12, count the number of chips on the inside of that dozen.  It comes to 8 chips right?  Well, add the chips that are bet on the outside columns, and dozens that correlate with this dozen.  Those bets being the 2 chips on 1st 12, 2 chips on 1st column of 12, 2 chips on the 3rd column of 12, 1 chip bet on the 2nd column of 12, and of course, the 8 chips bet on the inside of the layout.
     Now remember, we are only working with the first dozen here. You see how these bets intersect?  It does the same thing with every column, and dozen on the layout, and all of them will add up to 15 chips total.  All of them. Guaranteed!
   I like the name "Belt Buckle" better, because when you place all of these bets on the layout, it looks like a belt buckle, or a belt with a buckle, lol but for me, it's the perfect strategy.  The only one I dream about.  As for the 2,333 chip buy-in, I just took the 70 chip total, times that by 3, and added decimal point to it, and came up with the 2,100 buy-in.
Bates
                                       Exercise Everyday, So that Every Day Isn't An Exercise

[ADulay]

Norm,

  Didn't I already reply to this goofy play in several other threads in several other forums where you continue to throw this stuff on the wall?

  Like I said earlier, in another thread, in another forum:

  It only took two hours to blow through 10,000 units with this one.

  As much fun as it is to watch the RX graphs just plummet off the bottom of the page with amazing regularity, isn't posting up these fantasty schemes getting a bit tiresome by now?

  AD

[Norman Bates]

Norm,

 Didn't I already reply to this goofy play in several other threads in several other forums where you continue to throw this stuff on the wall?

 Like I said earlier, in another thread, in another forum:

 It only took two hours to blow through 10,000 units with this one.

 As much fun as it is to watch the RX graphs just plummet off the bottom of the page with amazing regularity, isn't posting up these fantasty schemes getting a bit tiresome by now?

 AD

    As for ADulay, I think he means well.  He's really not such a bad guy.  He's just a heckler with little input on how to find a solution, or salve a problem, but he at least acknowledges that he's just a Baccarat player, and is here looking for a strategic solution to his problems that he's having at that game.  I'm sure that if I went to a baccarat forum that he was member of, said I was a roulette player, and constantly nagged him about his losses, everybody would be PO'd, now wouldn't they?  For some reason nobody wants to acknowledge my existence even if I explain myself over, and over, or have a system that works if they would just follow instructions.  So, either way, I get scr**d.  I really don't think it fair, but if you want find out for yourself how things are going, just plug in the bets, and get started.  OK?
Bates

[ADulay]

    As for ADulay, I think he means well.  He's really not such a bad guy.  He's just a heckler with little input on how to find a solution, or salve a problem, but he at least acknowledges that he's just a Baccarat player, and is here looking for a strategic solution to his problems that he's having at that game.
Bates

Norm,

  Let's attempt to confine the conversations to a single forum.  Pick one and I'll stay there to play these minds games with you.

  I'm not heckling you for my amusement.  I'm just taking your odd splatter theories, running them through RX and then trying to recover from the shock of seeing the system just blow up right before my eyes.    As I'm the only one testing your stuff, you should try to understand that any serious student of the game is reading your offerings and just trying to comprehend what it is you're doing!

  As to my baccarat game, it's going quite well this year.   About the middle of 2009 I made a major revamping of my game and my attitude towards baccarat and it is paying off quite nicely now.    I only come into these gambling forums, at least the ones that I can stand to read anymore, because of the common challenge that we all have and it's interesting to see how others are handling it.

  So, pick a forum and I'll reply to your systems there.

AD (it's always nice to get a monthly check from the casino)

[Norman Bates]

     That's awesome.  That's what I like to hear after watching people get smashed, and lose their money every night.  I really didn' t feel very good about that.  Ever since then, I've always wanted to see the tables turned.  In that respect, I think we are on the same page.  As I've stipulated in some of my threads, I not sure which ones, but I've put disclaimers on some of them.  I'm weeding them out as I go, but yeah, I would like to use this forum, because bar none, it's the best one.  I can change my threads, and I get more responses here than anywhere else.  Plus I like all of the different areas, like humor for instance.  But I digress...Certainly you must remember me saying something about not wanting to see anybody getting hurt over one of my threads.  
      Now I would like to explain exactly how my latest bet placing strategy works.   First thing I would like for you to notice is how no matter which way you add up the columns, or dozens, and conjoining inside bets it comes out to 15 chips every time.
      Now, this is where it gets a little tricky.  Let me explain.  In the first 12, count the number of chips on the inside of that dozen.  It comes to 8 chips right?  Pay close attention because I don't want you to miss this; add the chips that are bet on the outside columns, and dozens that correlate, or that are in conjunction with this dozen.  Those bets being the 2 chips on 1st 12, 2 chips on 1st column of 12, 2 chips on the 3rd column of 12, 1 chip bet on the 2nd column of 12, and of course, the 8 chips bet on the inside of the layout.  
     Now remember, we are only working with the first dozen here. You see how these bets intersect?  It does the same thing with every column, and dozen on the layout, and all of them will add up to 15 chips total.  All of them. Guaranteed!  It's like a basket weave. Hence, the name "Loop d' Loop). That, and only having 36 chips,( the same number of betting locations on the other half of the inside of the layout), brings this strategy home.  I like the name "Belt Buckle" better, because when you place all of these bets on the layout, it looks like a belt buckle, or a belt with a buckle, lol but for me, it's the perfect strategy.  The one I've been dreaming about.  As for the 3,566 buy-in I just divided the 107 chip total by three, added two decimal points on it, and it gave me the answer.  Thanks for your time.
     If you lose you need to go back to work, pay your bills, and save the 3,566 that you need for another buy-in.  If you win you need to go back to work, pay for another month of bills, and make another 3,566 buy-in before you play again.  You want to do this so that you know exactly when to stop.  In this case the buy-in is 3,566.  I don't want anyone to see anybody get harmed in anyway, because of one of my threads, and I really don't want to get pinned down about how much to win before you leave the table.
     I would say if you double up, leave the table.  Meaning no matter how many times you lose the 3,500, you just keep adding up the losses, so when you do get a streak by doubling up, you know when to stop.  That's what I  was told you should do if you play blackjack, or slots, although it just seemed to be standard issue response.  Diplomatically. We all knew there are few, (if any) relationships between the two.  I hope somebody who is skilled in this type of knowledge can shed some light for all of us, but what I do know is that you should never play with, "scared money". Besides, I think you  can tell when it's getting to be dooms day out there.  Right?
Bates

[ADulay]

Normie,

  Is it safe to assume that this will be where all future splatter posts are sent up?

  If so, I'll cease replying to your other posts in all the other roulette forums.

  I don't know who will be happier, this forum or the other ones.

  I thought for sure you'd be on roulette.cc but it's your choice.

  I'll play along for a little while anyway.

  AD

[ADulay]

-