Since roulette can't be beaten................

[albertojonas]

Coming from you that's funny.  Aren't you the one that was going to explain everything?

I started to expose something you could not understand. It was a concise and precise system to "read" the flow of a distribution. At least Cheese started to discuss the validity of it with me, as you just trolled with your insignificant and pointless remarks.

Thing is, if i quit the competition today, i leave in the first place.

As for the above remark, explaining as nothing to do with the fact that it proves something or not and even less with the fact that you Lost, were loosing, and abandoned  the competition.

I am not feeding the troll anymore.

You lost your opportunity of being humble and learn something.

.|.

[crackers]

AJ -" You lost your opportunity of being humble and learn something."

What a privilege that would have been. I've been using distribution probability as
a baseline statistic for decadse. I openly argued the points many years ago at GG.
There is no way you have done anything substantial and that you can teach
that is new. At most you have created your own way to categorize characteristics
of randomness. It is clear that you really don't know me. Had you made a valuable
contribution to understanding randomness I would have been at the front of the
line stating it. Any time anyone demands from me underserved or unearned praise
then my immediate reaction is to question its source. You need to earn the right to
be heard. If you can't do that then please don't blame me.

[albertojonas]

AJ -" You lost your opportunity of being humble and learn something."

What a privilege that would have been. I've been using distribution probability as
a baseline statistic for decadse. I openly argued the points many years ago at GG.
There is no way you have done anything substantial and that you can teach
that is new. At most you have created your own way to categorize characteristics
of randomness. It is clear that you really don't know me. Had you made a valuable
contribution to understanding randomness I would have been at the front of the
line stating it. Any time anyone demands from me underserved or unearned praise
then my immediate reaction is to question its source. You need to earn the right to
be heard. If you can't do that then please don't blame me.

You simply can not admit that there is something you do not know, that's precisely what makes you blind.
You did not understand what i was writing about. admit it.
Your loss i do not need to be heard. I was sharing and contributing for free common knowledge of a forum interested in roulette.
.|.

[cheese]

"I am sort of living proof that Roulette can be
beat every time I set out to beat it."  Cracked.


Except in public competitions, of course. Then
everybody BUT Gizmo proves it can be beaten.
Ironic, huh. Its called Proof talks and bullshit walks.
Or in this case, runs as fast as he can the other way.

[crackers]

You simply can not admit that there is something you do not know, that's precisely what makes you blind.
You did not understand what I was writing about. admit it.
Your loss I do not need to be heard. I was sharing and contributing for free common knowledge of a forum interested in roulette.

What an ego. I didn't even know you were sharing anything that required my attention.
At least not until you flipped out and took your toys away. You've  been a real pill ever
since. Now you want me to admit something where I have nothing to base it on. You
said you were getting somewhere with cheese. I would love to see you explain your
discoveries with him. You were going to have a discussion involving probability
distribution  with cheese. Perhaps you will find that much needed praise the way
you require it from him. Don't hold your breath.

[albertojonas]

What an ego. I didn't even know you were sharing anything that required my attention.
At least not until you flipped out and took your toys away. You've  been a real pill ever
since. Now you want me to admit something where I have nothing to base it on. You
said you were getting somewhere with cheese. I would love to see you explain your
discoveries with him. You were going to have a discussion involving probability
distribution  with cheese. Perhaps you will find that much needed praise the way
you require it from him. Don't hold your breath.

.|.

[crackers]

Except in public competitions, of course. Then
everybody BUT Gizmo proves it can be beaten.
Ironic, huh. Its called Proof talks and bullshit walks.
Or in this case, runs as fast as he can the other way.

One problem Spike. You already said these demonstrations prove nothing. 12 spins
in two separate examples proves I'm a fraud. Fine. The world is a better place because
you are here to protect everyone. Don't you have an appointment with your new
prodigy?

[albertojonas]

One problem Spike. You already said these demonstrations prove nothing. 12 spins
in two separate examples proves I'm a fraud. Fine. The world is a better place because
you are here to protect everyone. Don't you have an appointment with your new
prodigy?

.|.

[cheese]

12 spins
in two separate examples proves I'm a fraud.

I believe you think you can win when you enter
a competition and are completely baffled when
you don't. Its because your testing is flawed
and you curve fit the results so it looks like you're
winning, when in reality you're losing.

[crackers]

I believe you think you can win when you enter a competition and are completely baffled when
you don't. Its because your testing is flawed and you curve fit the results so it looks like you're
winning, when in reality you're losing.

I'm so glad that you've committed yourself to what you think I do.

I expect at least three extraordinary opportunities in 150 spins.  I never
worry about using my bankroll to my advantage. This is far beyond your
flat bets only experience. Using ten percent of my bankroll is part of my
method. Had you seen 150 bets you would see. Flat betting is ridiculous.
But it suits you. Too bad you can't prove anything. That includes your
opinion too.

[cheese]

I expect at least three extraordinary opportunities in 150 spins.  I never
worry about using my bankroll to my advantage. This is far beyond your
flat bets only experience. Using ten percent of my bankroll is part of my
method. Had you seen 150 bets you would see. Flat betting is ridiculous.
But it suits you.

150 spins is completely unplayable under normal casino
conditions. You're talking 4-5 hours of play and even longer
if its real busy. Flat betting is only ridiculous to you because you
can't do it. Once you understand how random works, its the
other bets that become ridiculous. This is because there are no
'better' bets in roulette, they all can be condenced down to flat
betting on the EC's. This is obviously over your head, just keep
tilting at your windmills, you seem to enjoy it.

[crackers]

What a joke you are. I spend a minimum of five to ten hours every time I
go to a casino to play. Remember those years at GG? I gave flat betting EC
only a try. Yes, at a minimum of 150 - 200 spins on real wheels. I came to the
conclusion that reading all that is random is not beyond my thinking
capacity. After watching you debate the mathboyz all these years I can
see why you are stuck with flat betting the randomness of just the EC's
only. It's your unqualified claim to fame. Take a look around Spike. The
world is leaving you behind. Nobody is flat betting the EC's.

150 spins is completely unplayable under normal casino
conditions. You're talking 4-5 hours of play and even longer
if its real busy. Flat betting is only ridiculous to you because you
can't do it. Once you understand how random works, its the
other bets that become ridiculous. This is because there are no
'better' bets in roulette, they all can be condenced down to flat
betting on the EC's. This is obviously over your head, just keep
tilting at your windmills, you seem to enjoy it.

[cheese]

I spend a minimum of five to ten hours every time I
go to a casino to play.

LOL, sure you do. All beginners do that. Don't
worry, you might get better at it eventually and
only have to spend 2-3 hours there. Do you take
a cot with you so you can lay down when 'roulette
stress' kicks in, like it does with every contest you
enter?

[crackers]

Spike, you are one of those foolish idiots that expects randomness to be
opportunistic just because you just arrived at the casino. So you win every
time with just 30 to 50 spins. No wonder. As I recall you leave once you have
your $100. Man you can have the baloon concession market. The chump and
his chump change mentality. Look at all the people claiming they read
randomness. They are all around here. I told you to go out and win your
millions. You still riding the casino bus? You better hurry up. I'm winning
this war. People, by whatever means, are wrapping their heads around
randomness. There is no chance in this world that it's because of you.

[cheese]

So you win every
time 

Plan the play and play the plan. Seriously,
5-10 hours, do you take a bag lunch and
put your name on it? You don't want to
miss what might be THE spin. You pro's
and the lives you lead.

[cheese]

-