Interesting point from the Wiz site

[System]

As long as ALL definitions and standards for ALL players is even, I'm cool with that. My issue is when the AP (cough) crew think they can GET AWAY with certain aspects of posting. Not on my watch Suzie.

Ken

Get away with what ken? Please do us a favour and say what that is. I would like to know as well.

[Twocando]

I would like to chat with you guys on skype.

There is only 1 way in beating the wheel. Send me your skype name please.

[Kelly]

It has been explained to you about 10 times now:

1. Do we use past numbers to find a tilted wheel. No.

2. Do we use past numbers to find a visual bias. No.

3. Do we use past numbers to find an average bounce lenght. No.

4. Do we use past numbers to find a particular ball speed. No

5. Do we use past numbers to find the rotor speed. No.


Whats your IQ for god sake. (If you got one)

[Mr J]

Get away with what ken? Please do us a favour and say what that is. I would like to know as well.

Slamming method posts but its not ok for the opposite to happen. Insisting on answers but the AP (cough) crew won't answer the same things. Same definitions for ALL.

Ken

[Mr J]

It has been explained to you about 10 times now:

1. Do we use past numbers to find a tilted wheel. No.

2. Do we use past numbers to find a visual bias. No.

3. Do we use past numbers to find an average bounce lenght. No.

4. Do we use past numbers to find a particular ball speed. No

5. Do we use past numbers to find the rotor speed. No.


Whats your IQ for god sake. (If you got one)

I'm glad you're here Kelly, these guys need backup help.

Ken

[Mr J]

1. Do we use past numbers to find a tilted wheel. No.

2. Do we use past numbers to find a visual bias. No.

Do NOT ask me to go looking for the past posts BUT there were some AP guys posting that said, you must use a few past numbers. Maybe not alot but it is NEEDED.

Ken

[Kelly]

So where is it you see gamblers fallacy in advantage play ?  When i track for wheels i rarely not down 1 SINGLE NUMBER before i know which wheel i will go at first.

[Mr J]

So where is it you see gamblers fallacy in advantage play ?  When I track for wheels I rarely not down 1 SINGLE NUMBER before I know which wheel I will go at first.

COME ON KELLY. You might not like the title of gamblers fallacy but you know damn well it is. If you're proud of it, not a big deal but dont deny it. You're better than that.

Ken

[Twocando]

go for it ken then you've got something to do.

VB works on the spin.

bias is on the wheel of there is something causing it to land more in a sector than others.

DS is the distance from the release to the next number.

so a dealer can be bias with his/her spin? yes

Ping pong between sectors. or even going back to a sector. speed and release of the ball.

[System]

COME ON KELLY. You might not like the title of gamblers fallacy but you know damn well it is. If you're proud of it, not a big deal but dont deny it. You're better than that.

Ken

Ken, if you do not know what Gambler's fallacy is then I'm afraid you are lost. Gamblers' fallacy do not apply to AP because of physics. VB, I know +/- where the ball will drop. Bias, I know that the wheel is faulty so certain numbers will occur more. DS. The dealer has a signature. In other words, Whether you look at numbers from numbers or sectors from sectors. The last being the least of the recognized AP techniques I think. I wish I was competent in AP techniques. One day I will be.

[System]

  Ken. I'm an system player combined with some DS. I would love to learn more about AP. Would you mind if I contact you? Would you please give me a avenue of communication? email, MSN, Skype etc.

[Mr J]

Ken, if you do not know what Gambler's fallacy is then I'm afraid you are lost. Gamblers' fallacy do not apply to AP because of physics. VB, I know +/- where the ball will drop. Bias, I know that the wheel is faulty so certain numbers will occur more. DS. The dealer has a signature. In other words, Whether you look at numbers from numbers or sectors from sectors. The last being the least of the recognized AP techniques I think. I wish I was competent in AP techniques. One day I will be.

Follow along please.....if you're gonna continue to slam method posts, I call you out regarding your gamblers fallacy style of play. Like it, dont like it, I dont care.

Ken

[Mr J]

I have a question/point, maybe someone can help me out. You notice that on MY recent threads, I get ATTACKED from others. Thats fine but where are YOUR threads, me attacking you? Can you point those out for me, thanks.

Ken

[System]

I have a question/point, maybe someone can help me out. You notice that on MY recent threads, I get ATTACKED from others. Thats fine but where are YOUR threads, me attacking you? Can you point those out for me, thanks.

Ken

Every thread asking a question, is attacking. Simply because your questions is not to learn but to attack. You, say you will not answer questions because of "keywords" and that it will be attacked. Simply you are a classic example of someone trying to attack AP keywords. The sad part is that you have no basis. You throw around words like Gambler's fallacy towards AP whereas that is totally reversible. Ken, you know as well as I do that you are a fake. You are not winning at roulette. You pretend to be. You divert questions put to you but feel that answers put by you should be answered. Ken. I really do not know what to say anymore except for the fact that there has not been one person to back you. Yes you are right, you do not need anyone to back you. Don't you for one second believe that if nobody is backing you, that no person is actually believieng what you are saying? Ken I'm afraid that your time is short.

[Mr J]

Lets try again......where are YOUR threads, me attacking you?

Ken

[Mr J]

-