Interesting point from the Wiz site

[Kelly]

COME ON KELLY. You might not like the title of gamblers fallacy but you know damn well it is. If you're proud of it, not a big deal but dont deny it. You're better than that.

As soon as you tell me where i use past numbers and for what, you can call AP for gamblers fallacy. Until then you just sound rather silly. 

Its a bit awkward but i actually got the feeling that im too intelligent to understand you.   

[System]

Lets try again......where are YOUR threads, me attacking you?

Ken

It is difficult explaining. But at the same time it is quite clear, you are attacking the AP (cough) people.

You ask what posts? Every post.

[Mr J]

As soon as you tell me where I use past numbers and for what, you can call AP for gamblers fallacy. Until then you just sound rather silly. 

Its a bit awkward but I actually got the feeling that im too intelligent to understand you.   

I did NOT say you. Please quote correctly. I said.....there are past posts saying that a person needs a FEW spins to spot a bias. Either way, AP (in general) is gamblers fallacy, everybody knows this.

Ken

[Mr J]

It is difficult explaining. But at the same time it is quite clear, you are attacking the AP (cough) people.

You ask what posts? Every post.

ATTACKING ON ANOTHER PERSONS THREAD. Sound better? I got all day for this. STILL WAITING >> So where are *YOUR* threads, me attacking you?

Ken

[System]

ATTACKING ON ANOTHER PERSONS THREAD. Sound better? I got all day for this. STILL WAITING >> So where are *YOUR* threads, me attacking you?

Ken

So what? Should we all ignore your posts? Should we all just open new threads in our names? Would that justify it?  So, in this forum, do not answer other;s threads? Start your own?

[Mr J]

YES or NO, do you have your OWN threads, me attacking you? Simple question.

Ken

[System]

YES or NO, do you have your OWN threads, me attacking you? Simple question.

Ken

Ken you have run out of ideas.

[Mr J]

Ok cool, I ran out of ideas. I asked maybe 5 times now, will you point out those threads to us, thanks!

Ken

[System]

Ok cool, I ran out of ideas. I asked maybe 5 times now, will you point out those threads to us, thanks!

Ken

And I told you that i will not go through past posts. Why don't you post them?

[Mr J]

They are not posts. They would be threads started by YOU, with me attacking you. Where are they sir?

Ken

[Kelly]

Yes you need to see the wheel spin to spot the bias, you don`t need the outcome numbers. There is a HUUUUGE difference. You really try to bend the truth in every way you see fit to match your agenda.

[System]

They are not posts. They would be threads started by YOU, with me attacking you. Where are they sir?

Ken

You know what? If it is not removed, others will read all. No more has to be said.

[Mr J]

Yes you need to see the wheel spin to spot the bias, you don`t need the outcome numbers. There is a HUUUUGE difference. You really try to bend the truth in every way you see fit to match your agenda.

The only agenda going on is the AP (cough) crew trying to convince hard working method guys that they cant win. Now THATS an agenda. Good luck with that BTW, you'll need it. 

Ken

[Mr J]

You know what? If it is not removed, others will read all. No more has to be said.

I dont think many members here are interested in gamblers fallacy. Leave it up, delete it, nobody cares.

Ken

[System]

The only agenda going on is the AP (cough) crew trying to convince hard working method guys that they cant win. Now THATS an agenda. Good luck with that BTW, you'll need it. 

Ken

"Hard working System creators? be honst with yourselves.  How many of you have created  something new? Just be honest. What system have you created? Have you tested it decively? Don't believe i Ken. I't's all BS

[System]

-