We are exploring an effort to convert to a viable method and possible system the concepts expressed in the thread Reducing Volatility @ TwoCatSam. For further background on this methods birth go to the following link: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1210265929/60
Here are some of the concept parameters from which I built a framework to test the method:
I think I've come up with a concept to add to the method that can be used within a system. Modifying the the LW registry to L0W registry. This will enable you to see patterns within a more compound betting structure.
L0W Registry Legend
L=loss (negative unit)
0=breakeven (zero unit)
W=win (positive unit)
Below are a couple sample test where the L-0-W Registry was applied with EC (Red/Black & Even/Odd) compound bets:
Table 2 (+400) within 5 spins
0 Spins blank RBG Evens/Odds L0W
1 13 B O ep
2 28 B E RE 0 0
3 24 B E RE 0 0
4 18 R E RE 0 0
5 6 B E RE 200 W
6 25 R O BO 0 0
7 27 R O BO 0 0
8 5 R O BO 0 0
9 35 B O BO 200 W
10 34 R E 400
L0W registry: 000w000w.
Table 3 (+400) within 5 spins
0 Spins blank RBG Evens/Odds L0W
1 24 B E ep
2 14 R E RO 0 0
3 33 B O RO 0 0
4 31 B O RO 0 0
5 7 R O RO 200 W
6 6 B E BE 200 W
7 35 B O 400
L0W registry: 000ww.
Each sample test session, have out of balance patterns, out-of-balance pattern are three consecutive combinations of L-0 without an W, i.e. 000, LOO, LLO, OLO, LLL, LOL. Lets test the effect of each of these out-of-balance patterns and others patterns where there is only one W, within 4 spins, that is another possible trigger to bet. These virtual tracking patterns could enhance the strength of the betting rules.
The betting rules are as follows
• First Session Bet is opp of entry point (ep)
• Alternate the opp bet on each win or loss
• if a break even result, its same as last bet
• If stop win goal is achieved, skip a spin and wait for next spin entry point trigger
• Apply the L0W registry where needed
Lucky Strike, I think your Cut Point Methodology can be modified to benefit this method's functionality. I just did a quick read of the concept, I didn't understand it all, but my intuition says it will be beneficial when combined with the L0W registry.
Please run some sessions and evaluate the L0W registry and share your results, maybe we may a very useful system out of this afterall.
Bloom
Bloom
This morning I did 50 spins from Riverbelle. I used every combination possible, not just Red/Odd. I used:
red/odd
red/even
red/small
red/large
bl/o
bl/e
bl/s
bl/l
l/o
l/e
s/o
s/e
If I have missed an combination possible containing the odds/evens; the large/small; and the reds/blacks please point it out to me. I come up with twelve possible combinations. Check me out!
Anyway, using the LOW method, I found many, many more losers than winners. About 10-1. Sorry.
I did find that if you bet the opposite of your EP, ie. Red/Odd (5) came---bet black/even, there were winners. I found 48 winners and 36 losers, a whopping profit over all. This is flat betting; no progression.
Here's what a run looked like:
25 (r/o) came and I bet on bl/e.
34 was a push
12 was also
22 was a winner.
EP
O
O
W
This would be awfully difficult to track in real play, but I will try to build a model to accomplish it if the method holds up over a few hundred spins.
Frankly, I expect it to fail and I was just seeing an anomaly.
Sam