Gamblers Fallacy (not what you think)

[Mr J]

Ok no problem, thanks. Have a great day.

Ken

[Kelly]

Crogo, if you wanna argue about how VB works you need to read up on the most basic things like cause and effect etc. I deliberately picked a very clear scatter diagram, yet you say the area of the bounce is too wide.  Take a wild guess on the Standard Deviation of the main 3 number peak, 6.95 Standard Deviation,  you think THATS a fluke ?

Ken started this thread because he hates ap players, the only reason it comes up in just about every thread is because ken puts it there. I cant remember when I ever started a thread on advantage play, must be years ago.

[gizmotron]

A) One restaurant

B) With a partner

C) Around 80% of winnings, not 100%

D) You sound jealous

E) Good, you should be  

F) 10 posts....of course everyone has to be on HIGH ALERT until we really find out who it is, boring.

G) Methods, not systems

Ken

I know who it is. He's been around the forums for years. And it's really him. Ken, you should know this one.

[GogoCro]

Kelly, my nick is Gogo (cro - croatia).
Well its my opinion nothing more. I do not accept privatly owned wheels wich is set-up on purpose to be tilted and off!
That test have no purpose. Its camuflage. In real casino nobody can be certant that AP works! I did not speak of you individually distrupting system threads. But is known fact that AP players tend to patrionase others with BS terms; thats GF. Its prudish comment especialy knowing thati AP is some sort of GF too.
Diamond, wheel and other hardware is not changed but speed of rotor and ball, direction, angle - that is changed every spin. So AP is relied on past setting but in fact every spin is slightly diffrent. So to think that will hit same diamond and bounce in same spread is sort of GF.
Bias present in casino roulette with calibration today is unfounded and even some sort of bias exist, its not enough to give advantage to any side. In privatly owned wheel you can set up wheel how you can but those results have no meaning.
I do not care about is this GF or not- roulette is a game not money making scheme.

[Kelly]

Okey doke cro.

You are right captn, i dont gamble.  But i will bet anything that i play more roulette than you do. And has probably by now seen more casinos in more different countrys than you will in your entire life.

[Mr J]

Crogo, if you wanna argue about how VB works you need to read up on the most basic things like cause and effect etc. I deliberately picked a very clear scatter diagram, yet you say the area of the bounce is too wide.  Take a wild guess on the Standard Deviation of the main 3 number peak, 6.95 Standard Deviation,  you think THATS a fluke ?

Ken started this thread because he hates ap players, the only reason it comes up in just about every thread is because ken puts it there. I cant remember when I ever started a thread on advantage play, must be years ago.

Because I hate AP (the broken dream) players? Hmmm, this was my ORIGINAL question >>


If a roulette/casino gambling author was writing a book, would you agree >>>  When he wrote about 'gamblers fallacy', we are reading HIS past experiences, HIS views on the subject, HIS definition, HIS opinions. True or not? (Yes I know, he could be doing some interviews etc. asking other players.) <<<


"I cant remember when I ever started a thread on advantage play" >>> Glad you mentioned that, I also brought that up with Snowjob many times. Could it be because you sit back and WAIT for method threads/posts just so you can attack others?

Ken

[Mr J]

"I know who it is. He's been around the forums for years. And it's really him. Ken, you should know this one" >>> They have no shame. Once you are GONE, you should stay gone.


Ken

[gizmotron]

"I know who it is. He's been around the forums for years. And it's really him. Ken, you should know this one" >>> They have no shame. Once you are GONE, you should stay gone.
Ken

I might be wrong but I think the Capt was never here before. He genuinely just started posting here. I might be wrong though. He's been in other forums for years.

[Mr J]

Well, either way, he is stirring the pot and enjoying himself. Kind of odd but whatever.

Ken

[Kelly]

Ken you have been DEMANDING answers from aps for as long as I remember. If we are not quick enough, you are ........waiting.  Im not sitting around waiting for something to attack, you come to me with some pretty ridicoulous questions that you want answered.  Like the a gambling writers opinion on gamblers fallacy. His opinion on the subject could be anything depending on who writes, but the definition of GF has been set in stone a long time ago.

You dont have to be very intelligent to know the difference between opinion and deffinition. Its not even related to each other.

If Kriegman believes that anyone could walk out of a casino in profit if they just left when they were in profit, just shows that he never really tried or at least didnt do it very often because then he would know better Its merely a common asumption that does not hold water when tryed in reality or on paper.

Just tell me how you would do it and I will tell you which day you didnt succeed if you lived in Hamburg or Wiesbaden

PS: The captn is a copy cat. Hes not the one he wants to look like. 

[Mr J]

"If we are not quick enough, you are ........waiting" >>> WRONG, I give lots of time because to be FAIR, I understand people are busy with other things!

"just shows that he never really tried or at least didnt do it very often because then he would know better" >>> YOU DON'T KNOW THAT and you are making my point, the difference between fact and opinion.

Gamblers fallacy......thinking that a number(s)  will eventually catch-up (its due), Kelly....I dont have a huge issue with that definition, honestly!!

My problem is that you LUMP TOGETHER EVERY METHOD and say its gamblers fallacy, thats my issue not to mention, AP is nothing more than gamblers fallacy itself.

Ken

[Kelly]

We dont expect any numbers to be due because of which numbers came up earlyer. Thats the definition and it does not apply to ap-

[gizmotron]

PS: The captn is a copy cat. Hes not the one he wants to look like. 

How do you know that?

[Kelly]

Just a hunch,he is more captn than the original captn. Besides, he has never replyed or written anything to me before. How come now ?

[Mr J]

"We dont expect any numbers to be due because of which numbers came up earlyer" >>> Ok Kelly no problem with that but does that cover *EVERY* method? THAT IS MY BIGGEST ISSUE!!!!!!!

BTW, I agree, thats not the Capt.

Ken

[Mr J]

-