Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

iKwHIxJyJWtOa

Started by rob567, May 03, 2008, 08:20:19 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rob567

df36rJ  <a href="hxxp: osczhujlcrdk. com/">osczhujlcrdk</a>, rbuuezoswrui, [link=hxxp: yobaweerhksx. com/]yobaweerhksx[/link], hxxp: yexknyfybaay. com/

lucky_strike


an undefined base measurement

fact um momentum

a) how do we equalize the variance scale by assuming that their is a maximum potential gain

a) should we aim for strikes or periodic events

b) on an even bet scale each win must cover a loss

Cheers Lucky Strike

rob567

Sorry Lucky Strike

I am a bit confused about the question you asked.

Variance and method of play are unique to each system, there is no need to compare them, only the outcomes. There are a million ways to Rome and the only thing that counts is that we get to Rome.

In the end I only want to know which system is the most efficent at making a consistant profit, and to do that you need to have an equal method of judging the profit. Hence a need to make a unit equal to a unit.

Monte Carlo

lucky_strike

M Carlo i find all your post hitting the bottom of my heart ;)

Sorry.

I got an image in my head and you can call it "nano" cut point something.

I donĀ“t know how to explain it to make it correct.

Your periodic distribution of events for anything regarding 1/2.

I could say that 6 goes in the same direction and 2 go the opposite direction.

And i have not test it but i will find out how the math behind it works.

Here is the numbers.

Statistical Ecart 0.00 0.25 0.69 1.27

Regarding the variance scale, well i am learning as i write this and i will make a lot of testing.

But i have to admit it feels strange because i already know i will get above 62.5% if i place 1200 bets. I alredy succed to get 62.5%

Quotethere is no need to compare them, only the outcomes. There are a million ways to Rome and the only thing that counts is that we get to Rome.

[highlight]The issue here is the fluctation and if it exist any attempt to reduce it.[/highlight]

You can apply it to a mind at let it think 1 or 2 and let it say it.
You can play against this mind and still win.
You can make sports bettings and win.
You can play roulette and win.

It has an subjective element and a mechanical element to it.

If it works it works and then i have to start to love it.
Personalize it.
Use it.

lucky_strike


The variance scale for now is as you can see but maybe i will find out the never ending story that it actualy does not exist, a varience scale.

WWWWWWLLWLWLWLLWWWWWWWWWWLLWWWLWLWWWWWWLLWWWWLWLWLWWWLLWLLWWLWWWWLWLW
LWLWLWLLWWW

Cheers LS

lucky_strike


The most important measurement that becomes to be the only one that actually matter is this one.

I am honest to my self that's how i can be honest to others.

Cheers Lucky Strike

lucky_strike

-