An old system

[TwoCatSam]

kav

I am sorry about that!  You know, I don't even look at the dates on some of this stuff.  Going to the optometrist on the fifteenth.  Maybe he can help me.  Well, that's my excuse and I'm stickin' to it!

Thanks, kav, for digging this out of the "Cold Case" files.

Folks, Mr J invented it, kav dug it up and Iwonder vouched for it.  Maybe we should look at it.

Sam

[Mr J]

You left some people out! Wait untill the "negative, you cant win without an edge" guys have their post. Ken   

[Lanky]

You left some people out! Wait untill the "negative, you cant win without an edge" guys have their post. Ken  

Hi Ken.

Trust Me on this one Mate...
Iwonder will have some answers for them Cobber if they do....and they just might not like what they get told either.

I am one of the very few that know how this was tested over various different ways and how many Millions of spins were involved in that testing of each different way.

I also know WHO supplied Millions of spins to Iwonder as well. (We will leave that as a Surprise for now)

So this was genuine and the spins were not just thought of or made up by Iwonder.


@Sam

Gees Cobber You dropped Me off that list Quicker then I can pass wind.........Lmao.

Good On-Ya Mate.

Lanky.

[TwoCatSam]

Not makin' any lists anymore.  I expect to hear from the Devil himself any minute sayin', "Hey, Bud!  That's my wheel!"

Hi Lanky

Hope you're doing well and prospering.

Sam

[Spike]

Just pick any 3 numbers, the results will be the same. Forget all the voodoo..

[Mr J]

.......and there's one now.   

[Iwonder]

Ok Spike
If you wish, go and pick any three random numbers and bet them every fifth spin over 3 million spins and then post your results.  If you want an argument you have come to the wrong place.

I won't give you one.

As per my previous post, I have no solid proof, mathematical or otherwise, that this should work.  I stated very clearly that I am prepared to put my success down to luck that may not be repeated by other people.

By now I have a clear idea of how this method of play tracks in terms of bankroll depletion and the expectations I have of my overall profit.  I had already, long ago decided that if my winnings, over the course of a year, slipped under .12 of a unit, then I would shelve this method and take what I have made so far.  This has not happened yet.  If this is the case, I make a further committment to post here in this thread, in 36 point font the following:

DO NOT USE THIS METHOD.  ALL OF MY WINNINGS ARE DOWN TO LUCK - YOU MAY NOT HAVE THE SAME.

So anybody who wants to tell me, or others that this method is a load of bollocks, can hold their fire, because I will be there first to avert disaster for anybody that may 'fall prey' to another bodgy method.

For anybody who is looking at this thread, I have the following advice:
1. Test
2. Test
3. Test

Do not listen to me, or Mr J, or even that old codger Lanky.

Listen to yourself
Trust your own advice
If you don't have an understanding, leave the idea alone until you have gained that understanding.

This is especially pertinent in the kind of gains you expect to make out of any 'system'.
Don't listen to what I've said
Have the data that you have produced staring back at you off the page you wrote - and then make your own decision.

Cheers

Iwonder

[Bazeegar]

Thanks for all you have done. Is it possible for you to share your excel sheet here?

[sniper]

Hello Iwonder,

Thank you for your post and your willingness to share your testing results and your success in actual playing. Mr J, thanks for your original idea. The most important thing in life is knowing what we are actually doing.As long as we are happy and successful, ignore what non believer says or think.Successful people and those who want to be successful will know deep inside, you are telling the truth. We appreciate your kindness and sincerity.Wish you and Mr J great success.

Regards

sniper

[sniper]

Hello kav,

Credit goes to you too. Sorry, I missed you out in the above post.It's better late than never.

Regards

sniper

[Bazeegar]

Hello kav,

Credit goes to you too. Sorry, I missed you out in the above post.It's better late than never.

Regards

sniper

And what about Lanky Iwonder is back here because of him....

[Iwonder]

Baz
It was not a spreadsheet I created, it was a full blown program I created to test results.  Firstly, no it is not possible for me to post it because it is too big and it is my property.

Secondly, there is no point in posting it.  It will not help you in the future, it will only allow you to run the same test, with the same numbers as I have already done.   It is for you to find your own numbers and run your own tests, as you see fit, to satisfy yourself one way or the other.

This is not about 'tough love', or find your own path.  The rules are spelled out very clearly at the top of this thread.  I just don't see the point in others running my test, under my construction, with my numbers.  The end result here is: I am satisfied with where I am.  I have shared my satisfaction and the path that led me to that with everybody.  If you wish to take my satisfation at face value then good luck to you.  What I would advise everybody to do is gain their own satisfaction.  If that comes from testing large amounts of numbers, as it did for me, then do it.  If it comes from meditation and reflection, then do that.
But do it your own way.

As I said, you have the same information as I had on day one.  I have shared my experience, which should ONLY lead others to consider this method worthy of further study.

I hope this clears up my position


Cheers
Iwonder

[The Spiders Kiss]

Hi Iwonder
Thank you for bringing this thread back up to speed..Im sure people will be testing this and, I hope, bringing their results to this thread.
Thanks again mate
The Spiders Kiss

[Bazeegar]

I respect your decision.

I wanted to run my numbers through the excel program and I myself can not program it hence I sought basically the blank format. But anyways I respect you and your decision. You have been generous enough to share your results and I thank you for that.

Regards Bazee

[mane]

Hi,

   I´ve read this thread with a lot of interest since the results of the testing over 3 mil spins are really amazing.

   However i have a question about the way the system is played i would appreciate if someone could help me.
   As i understand it, you start by playing any 3 numbers (since none has hit in the begining), then you wait 4 spins and play again 3 unhit numbers. Now suppose you hit at the second try, do you keep the record of hit and unhit numbers and play again 3 unhit numbers or do you start a new record with all numers unhit ?

  Thanks for your help.

[mane]

-