Just watch this gold rush...

[Gizcontron]

Here is my Very Rare to Kill Progression.   Guess what? It really works.   After thousands of spin tests it has held up as a winner.    It does this because the pattern or sequence it takes to kill it is so very rare that it tends to work. 

It uses 4 steps.    It avoids the zeros.    It's completely rule based.    It has a few wait points that usually resolve in just a few spins. 

The point is to bet on the two dozens or columns that did not hit last.    It's almost that simple.    The other point is to wait for the next single to occur in the dozens after the last repeat.   

So if d1 (dozen 1, 1 to 12) hits you bet on d2 and d3 for the next spin. 

If d1 hits again then you lose.    You now wait for d1 to stop hitting.    As soon as d2 or d3 hits you have a single in series.    So then you start step two of the four step progression.    I takes a perfect set of repeats and singles to kill this progression. 

Here are a few spins tracking the dozens and the columns at the same time. 

| 1 2 3 | L M H |
|   X   |   X   |   -- 23 --  1
|   X   |     X |   -- 24 --  2
|     X |     X |   -- 33 --  3
|   X   |   X   |   -- 23 --  4
| X     | X     |   --  1 --  5
| X     |   X   |   -- 11 --  6
|     X | X     |   -- 25 --  7
| X     |     X |   --  9 --  8
|     X |     X |   -- 36 --  9
|     X |   X   |   -- 35 -- 10
|     X | X     |   -- 28 -- 11


Here is a stretch that kills it.    It happens in the dozens beginning at spin 122. 

| 1 2 3 | L M H |
| X     |     X |   --  6 -- 120
|     X | X     |   -- 28 -- 121
|     X |   X   |   -- 29 -- 122
|     X | X     |   -- 34 -- 123
|     X |   X   |   -- 35 -- 124
| X     |     X |   -- 12 -- 125
| X     |     X |   --  9 -- 126
| X     |   X   |   -- 11 -- 127
| X     |   X   |   --  2 -- 128
|   X   | X     |   -- 19 -- 129
|   X   |   X   |   -- 17 -- 130
|   X   | X     |   -- 19 -- 131
|     X |   X   |   -- 32 -- 132
|     X |     X |   -- 33 -- 133
|---------------|   --  0 -- 134
| X     |     X |   --  6 -- 135

The progression is 1,1 - 3,3 - 9,9 - 27,27.    You place a bet on each of the dozens that did not hit last. 

The cost is 80 units if you lose.    You win everything back plus 1 unit on any win inside the four steps. 

The thing that makes it work is that you never place bets on any repeats after the first repeat is discovered.    So runs of repeats don't take out your progressions.    Only the exact sequence of repeats after singles, four directly in a row has the power to break this progression. 

For the sake of clarity here are step by step instructions. 

d1 hits on spin 1.    Bet 1 on d2 and 1 on d3 for spin 2. 

d1 hits on spin 2.    Don't bet on spin 3. 

d1 hits on spin 3  Don't bet on spin 4. 

d3 hits on spin 4  Bet 3 on d2 and 3 on d1 for spin 5. 

d1 hits on spin 5  Bet 1 on d2 and 1 on d3 for spin 6. 

d2 hits on spin 6  Bet 1 on d1 and 1 on d3 for spin 7.   

d3 hits on spin 7  Bet 1 on d1 and 1 on d2 for spin 8. 

I generally lose one time in 300 spins betting both dozens and columns independently for each spin.    That's typical too.    Once in a while you get two losses.    And once in a while you get no losses.    With both progressions going on at the same time you tend to win about 20 units for every 30 spins. 

So there it is, now go change the world forever.    Just remember I thought this up.    To all those that think it won't change things just watch this gold rush. 

[Jean-Claud]

The lost chips will be FAR more than the winning chips
Ur system doesn t change the odds unfortunatelly

[medo]

--Exactly what I was testing with somebody.
I don't believe you got it from him.
Yes Jordan/JC/test this baby.

[Kingspin]

You know nothing about systems j claud. This is a good system. 

[I have cookies]

Kingspin - is it you ?

If i rember it correct you had a dog wish you took for walks and some-times collect coins with metal-detector /// very cool.
I also remeber that you stop playing - so if its you - how come you start play again as roulette systems is a waste of time.

Cheers

[I have cookies]

Just for fun i will run a quick test for 10 000 TRNGs and even if that succed is a waste of time.

O_o

[I have cookies]

That was a quick one and I got ...

2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
1

[bombus]

And it could have gone...

2
2
2
2
2
3
0
3
2
0
2

Stike 4 you're out!

[Jean-Claud]

OH man!!!
How much idiots are u all of u?
Does it take a lot of brain to understand that when u win u wil 1 chip and when u lose u lose 80 chips!!!!!
when will u recover?

I can t belive that there are so uneducated and stupid ppl in here

[gizmotron]

You guys really need an expert to analyze this one. You don't even know how to find its strong and weak points. If you just blindly bang away at it as with endless spins then you will average out a small loss at the expectation's of the house's edge. Big deal, so what.

But with randomness there are often times when singles tend to swarm together and the repeats tend to swarm together. There are no guarantees but it makes sense not to try this progression when many streaks of repeats are found to be all over the place.

I suppose an opposite bet, in a progression, might work as a juxtaposed balancing technique. So you can have a working progression when the repeats are in domination also.

What bothers me about all you skeptics is that you lack the basic curiosity to consider adjustment to changing conditions. You would rather just blast away at those that don't favor your common sense and practicality. But that's OK. You already have all you will ever get out of this forum. You don't influence many. Not really.

[I have cookies]

Any attempt to twist or argue about the method above with or with out variations is a big joke to claim it has any value at all - ridiculous ...

[xman1970]

You guys really need an expert to analyze this one.

& yet you replied 


Is there anybody you could recommend ?


Of course somebody who's name DOESN'T start with a G 

[gizmotron]

Any attempt to twist or argue about the method above with or with out variations is a big joke to claim it has any value at all - ridiculous ...

Evidenced that you don't know why I wrote what I did. You have displayed a basic ignorance that deserves recognition. You only see it as "ridiculous ." It's always fun to put something out there that confuses the so called wise. I doubt that any will follow your advice.

[gizmotron]

hey xman1970, you wouldn't have a life if you didn't have such a need for attention attacking me. You are so oblivious to what makes randomness display its many opportunities that you show everyone what a pathetic existence you embrace. You can't do what I can so you are going to have a temper tantrum again. Big deal.

[ripple]

Does this make any money? Yes or no?

[ripple]

-