System based on the law of the third

[trylobit]

No, it's not similar to GUT at all... (as GUT is based on the binomial distribution (crossings), and this is based on the law of third).

Read carefully the pdf...

You don't bet all the numbers left after 24th spin... As we all know it can be more then 20 numbers... You need different progression then it says in pdf then...

What you should do is what I've put in the spreadsheet. If you play single zero wheel:
You put in numbers and after 18th spin you select group A or B (the one with more "0", but between 8 and 13), so you bet minimum 8 numbers and maximum 13 with the progression from the table.

Why do you thing author would bother to divide numbers in 2 groups if you play all the sleepers anyway?

Does it make any sense for you?

Best regards.
tryl.

[pighead]

yes you are right, I misunderstood you in the last reply.  you only bet on the sleeping numbers in the remaining groups.

Even though GUT and this one are  based on two different theory, it does not stop us to use the method in GUT in my opinion.

In the group selected, if you have 12 sleeping numbers and 6 appeared, after a few more spins, do you think =0 and =1 will cross or not?

   

[trylobit]

I wouldn't mix it with GUT.
I always keep track of the numbers with crossing checker and I bet GUT if I think it's a good idea...

Time to go sleep...

Good night...

C u 2morrow.

[pighead]

I wouldn't mix it with GUT.
I always keep track of the numbers with crossing checker and I bet GUT if I think it's a good idea...

Time to go sleep...

Good night...

C u 2morrow.

good night
cu !

[hermes]

The version 333 is on the page 3 in the middle. It is always good idea to wait for 24 spins before betting, it doesn't matter if Euro or US roulette.
Hermes

[Clothdog]

When you win, do you stop and start the count over? do you count back 24 numbers? Or do you keep playing those same numbers?
cd

[pighead]

When you win, do you stop and start the count over? do you count back 24 numbers? Or do you keep playing those same numbers?
cd

Hi Clothdog,

I thought about that when I did my test and Since nothing was suggested in the file,  I restarted the counting over again upon the condition below whichever come first..

1. if the sleeping # goes below 5. let say you start with 8 numbers  and you hit 4 numbers, that will leave you 4 is left.( the system is only valid when 5-10 numbers formed in A/B group)
2. continue until the 36th spin. ( the attack zone ends)

[trylobit]

"( the system is only valid when 5-10 numbers formed in A/B group)"

No, it's valid when 8-13 numbers formed (5-10 numbers scratched out).

I was thinking about what to do on win, as it is not clearly said in the pdf. I stop and re-track.

Hermes, what do you think?

[hermes]

The most secure way would be to start from scratch what means to take a new 24 numbers because that way you adapt to a changing trend. The second best way would be to take 12 old and 12 new numbers, if you are in hurry. The system can hold a loss or two, it is difficult to lose with it. The single losses don't count only the whole session. The recovery from loss with the progression is strong but stoploss is recommended. It is not a holy grail but solid system.
Hermes

[trylobit]

Hi there!

I'm playing this one for 2 days now and I made 1091units (6h).
The highest I went on progression was 8th step.
I start betting after 18th spin, I use progression and after win. I scratch few numbers (1-6), depends on how the groups look.
Hermes, I will run some test on your version of this system.

Br.
tryl.

[pighead]

"( the system is only valid when 5-10 numbers formed in A/B group)"

No, it's valid when 8-13 numbers formed (5-10 numbers scratched out).

I was thinking about what to do on win, as it is not clearly said in the pdf. I stop and re-track.

Hermes, what do you think?

ttylobit, you corrected me again.. thanks

[hermes]

Thanks, Tryl. Best will be if you do the tests on the same numbers for v333 and v666 to compare which one is more successful.
I think that betting after 24 spins is more secure. If you lose some session try to reconstruct the session with waiting for 24 numbers before bets, if it change the situation (wins or loses?).
Hermes

[trylobit]

Good idea, I've just started to record the numbers from my sessions for test.
I'll give a feedback in few days in test zone and will give a link here.
Take care.

[trylobit]

Test of the Ludomeccanica and Version 333:

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/testing-zone/ludomeccanica-vs-version-333-t5290/

[hermes]

Looks like the devil 666 is beating me? In my testings I had often better results with the v333 but this test is too short to do resume. It could be some rotten batch of numbers, but one newer knows. JLP tested the v666 only and didn't lose either. Good combination could be to play the v666 with 24 waiting period instead of 18 because then you have less numbers to bet.
Thanks for the test trylobit (denkujem barzo). My grandfather was Polish from Krakow, but he didn't beat the roulette. The globe is too small.
Hermes

[hermes]

-