The > BlackPearl Double DZ/CL Strategy < Enjoy !!!

[BlackPearl]

I have 200,000 Dublinbet spins (from April09 to Aug09) both Table 1 and Table 2...

I can write a simulation script to test this... will keep you posted

VERY NICE, dear Poit !!

Would appreciate that very much! [/color]

BUT PLEASE have in mind: 
>  I am stopping my daily session normally, when I have made a small win of 5 up to 10 or 15%
>  And I stop at 20% Loss of my bankroll, then finish the daily session!

AND additionally:
>  I play with 5.00 Basic Bet on D-DZ or D-CL according to the Strategy.
>  I always place 50 cent or 1.00, 2.00 or more € on ZERO to cover that risk!
    The Zero bet is always adequate to the sum of money lying on the the tableau!

Can this also be integrated in the simulation ?


THANKS again for Your contribution!!

Sincerely,
ROLF 

[Spike!]

>   Roulette is borderless   --->   So You answer with Borders !>   Roulette is without limits   --->    So You answer with Limits>>

Roulette has no emotion, so you answer with emotion! Roulette has no feelings, so you answer with feelings!

See, I can make up nonsense just like you can...

[Poit]

I can segment the simulation into daily blocks. 1 spin a minute (so maths = 1x60x24 = 1440) 1440 spins = 1 day of spins/ 24 hours of time.

[Herb6]

In the long run, money management can't turn a losing system into a winning one.

[Poit]

I haven't played roulette for a good 12 months now..... that is because I am yet to program a system to be in profit after 1 million live spins.....

its more of a past time now..... when im bored at work or when I want to improve my programming skills.... and yea, if I do get a profit after a million spins, ill start playing roulette again....

I don't see a need for threads on these forums for pages and pages and pages.................... should be like this
1: post a system
2: program/simulate it
3: win/loss?
maybe 4: discuss why it doesnt work, improvements, or just give up entirely...

all of this talk of 'it works, trust me' or 'take my word for it' or 'im in profit after 5000 spins'... its all useless dribble that isn't worth the bytes wasted posting it.

[Noble Savage]

I don't see a need for threads on these forums for pages and pages and pages.................... should be like this
1: post a system
2: program/simulate it
3: win/loss?
maybe 4: discuss why it doesn't work, improvements, or just give up entirely...

all of this talk of 'it works, trust me' or 'take my word for it' or 'im in profit after 5000 spins'... its all useless dribble that isn't worth the bytes wasted posting it.

Couldn't agree more.

[insidebet]

Blackpearl,
You are getting fed up with this and so am I.

Just one more thing.  You keep repeating :"Keep your sessions short and you will have a lot more winning sessions than losing one".  Hasn't it occured to you that ALL systems involving steep progressions (and yours is certainly one of those), win at least 95% of the time if the session is relatively short?  It is just normal that you have a lot more winnings sessions than losing ones.  But if you play often enough, no monay management will make a winner out of
a loser.

Money management is only good if you have a positive expectation, which is not your case.  But then again you know that already.  If you had a positive expectation, it would be very simple: the longer you play, the more money you make. 

Insider

[Bayes]

The reality is, that money management and progressions alone, will only affect the variance (increase it). So yes, you're more likely to win often, but the increased 'swing' means that when you lose, you lose a lot more. Playing less (keeping sessions short) is a good idea when all you have is luck and progressions, but it's not enough.

Think about it this way: Setting a fixed win target or loss limit assumes that it will always coincide respectively with a peak or trough in the fluctuation, and the only way you can know that this will occur is if you have a crystal ball. If you really know when the fluctuations occur (and in which direction) there would be no need to use a progression at all; the fact that you don't know is the reason you have to use them in the first place.

[BlackPearl]

>   Roulette is borderless   --->   So You answer with Borders !>   Roulette is without limits   --->    So You answer with Limits>>

Roulette has no emotion, so you answer with emotion! Roulette has no feelings, so you answer with feelings!

See, I can make up nonsense just like you can...

Sorry, Spike. . .

Your Words are no arguments...  just words...

The STRATEGY presented here is something to work with, like an instrument.
You need exercise and exercise and time and concentration etc. ...
THEN You will find out about the fine differences and advantages of it...

People, who are not willing to READ in depth, THINK in depth and WORK with it,
will never find out about such successful ways of earning money with roulette...

AND, OF COURSE:  They dont stop their sessions, are always greedy, have loss of control,
then they go home to mummy crying...   "Ooh, Mom, this bad strategy is not working...    "

Behind my statements there is PROOF and evidence + logic
+ many practice and experience from old wise experienced roulette players I talked to...
Real men with real 10 /  20 / 30 or more years of practice, some programmers among them etc. ...

If you talk against me and this chain of arguments & live results, Your are not only talking against me,
YOU ARE TALKING AGAINST THOSE MEN AND THEIR STONECOLD STATEMENTS !!

Sorry, You have lost !

-----------------------

I think, most of the people posting here ( including the pseudo-professionals )
do play at highly coloured cling clong slot machines or whatever...

We do not play

We work at casinos

Big, big difference. . .


Bye, bye Spiky

[BlackPearl]

Hello Bayes,


thank You very much for that intelligent contribution !!!

I hope, someone will read it. . .   ( if someone can read here...)


Have nice day!
ROLF 

[BlackPearl]

I can segment the simulation into daily blocks. 1 spin a minute (so maths = 1x60x24 = 1440) 1440 spins = 1 day of spins/ 24 hours of time.

Dear Poit,

normally the daily sessions are always between 150 and 500 spins...

Sessions, which are much longer, are encreasing the probability of being beaten by
random constellations heavily!

But if it is possible to test the strategy this way only, will be in every case very interesting for us !!!

So Thanks Again !!!

Sincerely,
ROLF 

[Spike!]

Behind my statements there is PROOF and evidence + logic>>

Don't forget the baloney. Lot and lots of baloney...

Bye, bye Spiky>>

Buh Bye Blacky...  

[medo]

Much ado about something seen long before and proven as a los.
Just my 2 kunas.

[BlackPearl]

 
Here we go again :

 nolinks://vlsroulette.com/full-systems/daily-live-results-the-blackpearl-d-dzcl-strategy/



Live is Life . . .   da da dadadah ...

 Enjoy:    youtube.com/watch?v=EGikhmjTSZI&feature=related

[trav9996]

Am I missing something?  Every roulette wheel I've ever seen pays 2:1 on Dozen's and Columns.   If you bet on 2 Dozens at the same time, a win will only net you 1 unit, AND you're saying to bet on Zero at the same time?  That can't work unless you bet more on the DZ/CL's than the Zero.   So that's a minimum of $5/spin.   And a win on one Dozen still only nets you 1 unit.   Every loss is -5.   You would have to win 5 times as many spins as you lost just to break even.   This is the worst strategy ever.

I don't understand the use of the Fibonacci sequence either.   How can that possibly work?  If the sequence is 1 1 2 3 5 8 13. . . , by the time you get to 13 and win you still LOST $7!  Then you say to consider that a win and start over betting your base bet?  This is total complete cr@p.

I put your entire system into a spreadsheet and there is NO WAY that it works.   Not even with martingale betting (which is even worse).   Unless you can show everyone a random sample of 100 spins, how you bet and what the outcome should be, I say you're full of cr@p and are probably someone working for an online casino, trying to trick everyone into wasting their money.

[trav9996]

-