Have been winning every single time with this system

[mogul397]

The "best of 3" method intregues me.

I did a little back testing, but haven't seen any more discussion of it.

Any thoughts?

[iggy]

Hi again masso123;

Thank you so much for your quick response.

iggy

[mogul397]

Here is an attachment that represents how I see this.  First, it is an american wheel.
Next, the data is actual data that I gathered from an airball machine at Twin Rivers
in RI.

The left columb numbers the spins. The right columb starts with the bet
selection starting 20 spins back. Each spin is one betting event and then you
move on to the next spin 20 spins ago for the next. Only two wins out of the
20 that I tried.

Have I got this right?  (The mechanics)??

And why would it not work the way I did it?  As claimed?

Thanks

ALan

[mogul397]

Trying the upload again. Looks like just the wheel got uploaded.

This is the data.

[reddwarf]

Hi,

The only reason why it "seems" to work:

due to the high volatility the probability of reaching say 4000 units with this method is rather high. Of course this is a long term looser; why in the world would the last  5 spins be any special? Why would this overcome the not so great odds for roulette??

So this old guy and the OP are just plain lucky, when enough people play this for a long time: there will be a happy few and a mass of disappointed people (say 99%). All are the living proof of a remark of Einstein: "Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results."

reddwarf

[ripple]

Playing exact number and 4 to the right of this number (the number which appeared 20 spins ago), plus repeating section once if a winner (winner + 4 numbers to the right), I got trashed on smart live auto air roulette wheels (2 euro wheels)  . So having learnt the hard way i agree with Red despite the enthusiasm on this thread. Is it really possible that the HG is a system simply consisting of playing the number that appeared 20 spins ago and a few of its neighbours? I absolutely wish it were so, but the odds and the maths and the results are against it. The OP must be playing on a machine that (luckily for him and the OAP) has a glitch. Having said all that though what Ulysses so intelligently said is absolutely correct in theory, so maybe it was just my bad luck that for the hour+ I was playing the results were rocky enough for me to check and check again what the OP wrote as I was playing, just to make sure I was getting it right. As far as I can see I was playing it correctly though  .       

[mogul397]

Well for one thing I would never test a method live. If anything I would test
on paper, even in live play.

It looks to me like there is more benefit to playing all the OTHER numbers
for a method.  That is probably where the zero will get you. (If you can
play them all without dropping chips on the floor)

[Nathan Detroit]

I'm speaking a little out of ignorance here, but the 20 spins seems like
a recurrantly updated cycle. So the length of the time that you track
it is open ended.

Not just 20 spins.

If  with this method  the  first 10 spins  don`t give you a clue then  you better  be prepared   for   losses which  you can never recover.

It`s easier to  play  on paper and dream on than to   hit a casino with the  required minimum and even with that low amount you`ll  be  in for a rude awakening. The casino   will just nibble  away your money.

N.D. 

[mogul397]

Nathan, I have to say that from my brief time here in this
chat that I always enjoy your replies which always make sense
and are to the point.

Quite true.  (Which is why I would paper trade ANYTHING to death
before using real money).

Since we are being analytical though, I wonder why you/we are in this room if
the presumption is that nothing can or will work.

Beyond that though,  I always have known that "losers" usually seem to lose
a great deal more than the "house advantage".  And do it consistantly. Having
said that, I always keep wondering why one does not just "play the opposite"
of whatever proceedure common logic leads us to for play methods and be
on the opposite side of the fence.

Winning the large amounts that we are losing (Not me. I don't play to lose.
Speaking about the general public.  FYI, I live in  Mass.  Years ago when the
closest casino was in NJ I would pay $40 for the day bus trip down.  8 hours
down, 8 hours there, 8 hours back. (I called it a "suicide run"). I would play
the two $5 free chips , buy $10 in drinks, and the trip "cost" me $20.
Beyond that I would sit at roulette tables for HOURS, not wanting to leave
to go to the bathroom, and write results down.

Never placing a single bet.

[Nathan Detroit]

mogul,

The reason I am  at those forums is very  simple  : gathering information  .Where are the best casinos, the  best player friendly casinos ,and which of the  roulette machines to play should  the casino  suddenly decide to switch to electronic  or  airball.

example one  of  our nearby racinos ( only 25 miles)  offered airball roulette . Great. But 6  weeks later they  decided to switch entirely over to  Shuffelmaster VEGAS STAR. No way would I play those  machines .again

Those machnes were only good to play with  a certain method of either BLACK or RED. With my  particular method I  did  win  at 13 casino visits. The  14 th was  a  minor loss. 3 sessions  played :  Session 1 - loss, session 2 - push, session 3 -  win but did not make up for the loss sustained  at session 1.

This method is now my favorite one  to play  at  B & M casinos.

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[rayhd63]

Hello to all here in this forum.

I have tried allot on this system and never got it to get going.....
I do not belive that Casinos here in Germany are different , and the wheels are same, 36 numbers with a Zero.
So that cant be the error...
The only thing is , they change every 20-30 minutes. But which Casino lets them sit for more than that ?!?

@ gaza001
     Thanks for the program you did. Lot a work and it looks OK.
     I tried it out and I dowloaded actual nummer from Casinos (Berlin, Hamburg, Wiesbaden, Hohensyburg) , which were realy played and not generatet.
     After running the program : The system FAILED !!!
     So I let Roulette Extreme run for 100.000 Spins and : IT FAILED !!!  see att. Pic.
     It didnt even get to 100.000 spins , didnt even get half way through.

I think the idea is not bad. Maybe we schould try 5 number anticlockwise...

happy easter to all of you

[masso123]

Yeah i use it as a hit and run tactic and only play for around 20 spins a session if you played over 100spins at a time then yes i do admit that in the long term you would lose. Its basically a get in get a quick profit and leave strategy.

[superman]

Its basically a get in get a quick profit and leave strategy

And what happens when you get in for a quick session and hit the bad run that you know will happen?

[Robeenhuut]

Always flatbet dont really need a  progression. I only came up with this system after speaking to a 60 year old man who goes to the casino daily and told me the way he plays after many years of trying to find a consistent winner and he hasnt lost since starting this system. So I tried it myself and won the first time and thought is was just luck but have won now over 50 times so I dont think I could have been lucky all this time.

You won 50 times in row which is what? 2000 spins. Play or test 50000 spins and report back to us.

Regards

[iggiv]

Rayhd, this kind of method can't win on a long run like that. Only hit-n-run

[iggiv]

-