try this. small profits

[pins]

six line. progression. 1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.4.5.7.7.9.11.14.16.19.22.how could you lose

[bombus]

How about...... NO! 

[Robeenhuut]

six line. progression. 1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.4.5.7.7.9.11.14.16.19.22.how could you lose

If six line sleeps more than 20 spins which happens as often as EC sleeping 6 spins.

[pins]

if you can not pick a six line in 20trys give the game away.

[Proofreaders2K]

How about this trigger: Bet the first doublestreet that repeats within six spins.  Bet up to six times.  Win or lose repeat for start (and continue with progression if all six attempts miss).  No RNG

[TwoCatSam]

How about this trigger: Bet the first doublestreet that repeats within six spins.  Bet up to six times.  Win or lose repeat for start (and continue with progression if all six attempts miss).  No RNG

If you CAN pick a six-line (double street) once every 20 spins or less, you will get rich.  If you can pick one on average every twenty spins, that called dispersion and concentration and it will lay you out.

Sam

[Robeenhuut]

if you can not pick a six line in 20trys give the game away.

Try Vortex system or bet randomly 3 alternating sets of streets like 1,4,7,10   2,5,8,11  and 3,6,9,12.
Take guesswork out of it.

Regards

[insidebet]

Double cat,

I don't know you bother, brother.  This guy is either six years old or not very bright at all.

Insider

[Proofreaders2K]

Here's an idea: bet the first four numbers that hit in a doublestreet with Pins' progression.  No RNG

1.1.1.1.1.2.2.2.3.3.4.5.7.7.9.11.14.16.19.22

[TwoCatSam]

insidebet

Was this intended for me:  "This guy is either six years old or not very bright at all."

Or the guy who said he could pick one out of twenty?

Just wanted to know if I should be insulted.

Sam

[pins]

to try to beat a unbeatable game shows none of us are very bright.

[WARRIOR]

to try to beat a unbeatable game shows none of us are very bright.

Has nothing to do  with be bright,pay me 19 dollars instead of 18 on red and black and take out the table limits and then will see whos bright,they have the rules.

[insidebet]

Two cat,
Not you, of course.  I know people here mean well for the most part.  But some keep coming up with the most simplistic methods and sound like you just cannot help but win if you play them.

For the Xssss time: nothing simple will win at this game. If it could, everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY would know about it and be filthy rich.

You got to think way outside the box...

Isidebet

[Proofreaders2K]

...some keep coming up with the most simplistic methods and sound like you just cannot help but win if you play them.

Well I'm sure every method has won at one time or another.  I thought the goal here was to find the ones that win consistently more than lose.

[TwoCatSam]

Whew!

[TwoCatSam]

-