Two Different Number Systems by Ulysses and Proofreader2k

[TwoCatSam]

Gang

My wife and I play Roulette Revolution at a local Indian casino.

I am playing three systems simultaneously (Geez, I can't believe I speeled that right!)

The first is by Proofreader2k as a tribute to his pal Ulysses:

0: 13,20       1: 7,9       2: 16,6       3: 17,24        4: 0,6        5: 9,2        6: 15,31
7:  7,19        8: 28,5     9: 19,17     10:  25,9       11: 1,31     12:23,2      13: 22,19
14: 6,35       15: 22,16       16: 9,0       17: 14,23       18: 1,17
19: 31,2        20: 5,33         21: 22,32       22: 25,20       23: 11,36       24: 35,8
25: 21,27       26: 13,15       27: 17,20       28: 29,1        29: 18,36       30: 16,33
31: 34,28       32: 0,4          33: 7,21         34: 28,12       35: 10,3        36: 4,7

I bet these numbers using Mr J's progression for two numbers.  It has held up well.

Here is the second by Ulysses:

The Ulysses System

System groups

1 & 2 & 12 & 21 - Bet only when 12 or 21 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


1 & 3 & 13 & 31 - Bet only when 13 or 31 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


2 & 3 & 23 & 32 - Bet only when 23 or 32 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


1 & 2 & 3 & 11 & 22 & 33 - Bet only when 11 or 22 or 33 has landed twice within 6 paper hits. Bet for 6 spins max.


0 & 10 & 20 & 30 - Bet only when 0 or 10 or 20 or 30 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


With this, I have needed no progression.  I bet them until the trigger number is off the screen.  (In 10th position)  I sometimes get three or four hits within nine spins.

The third is by R.D. Ellison.  It is called the Aq system or something like that.  Naturally, it has my own spin on it.

OK, this is my worthwhile contribution. 

And I stole all three.......

Sam

EDIT:  Guys!  Please understand I'm in no way trying to take any credit here.  We just find these to be pretty good systems and wanted to pass on that information.

[Proofreaders2K]

Two are by Ulysses posted--I think--by Proofreader

Here's the first:

0: 13,20       1: 7,9       2: 16,6       3: 17,24        4: 0,6        5: 9,2        6: 15,31
7:  7,19        8: 28,5     9: 19,17     10:  25,9       11: 1,31     12:23,2      13: 22,19
14: 6,35       15: 22,16       16: 9,0       17: 14,23       18: 1,17
19: 31,2        20: 5,33         21: 22,32       22: 25,20       23: 11,36       24: 35,8
25: 21,27       26: 13,15       27: 17,20       28: 29,1        29: 18,36       30: 16,33
31: 34,28       32: 0,4          33: 7,21         34: 28,12       35: 10,3        36: 4,7

That's MY system Uly One which is a tribute to my pal Ulysses.   

[Robeenhuut]

Gang

My wife and I play Roulette Revolution at a local Indian casino.

I am playing three systems simultaneously (Geez, I can't believe I speeled that right!)

Two are by Ulysses posted--I think--by Proofreader

Here's the first:

0: 13,20       1: 7,9       2: 16,6       3: 17,24        4: 0,6        5: 9,2        6: 15,31
7:  7,19        8: 28,5     9: 19,17     10:  25,9       11: 1,31     12:23,2      13: 22,19
14: 6,35       15: 22,16       16: 9,0       17: 14,23       18: 1,17
19: 31,2        20: 5,33         21: 22,32       22: 25,20       23: 11,36       24: 35,8
25: 21,27       26: 13,15       27: 17,20       28: 29,1        29: 18,36       30: 16,33
31: 34,28       32: 0,4          33: 7,21         34: 28,12       35: 10,3        36: 4,7

I bet these numbers using Mr J's progression for two numbers.  It has held up well.

Here is the second:

The Ulysses System

System groups

1 & 2 & 12 & 21 - Bet only when 12 or 21 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


1 & 3 & 13 & 31 - Bet only when 13 or 31 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


2 & 3 & 23 & 32 - Bet only when 23 or 32 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


1 & 2 & 3 & 11 & 22 & 33 - Bet only when 11 or 22 or 33 has landed twice within 6 paper hits. Bet for 6 spins max.


0 & 10 & 20 & 30 - Bet only when 0 or 10 or 20 or 30 has landed twice within 9 paper hits. Bet for 9 spins max.


With this, I have needed no progression.  I bet them until the trigger number is off the screen.  (In 10th position)  I sometimes get three or four hits within nine spins.

The third is by R.D. Ellison.  It is called the Aq system or something like that.  Naturally, it has my own spin on it.

OK, this is my worthwhile contribution. 

And I stole all three.......

Sam

Hello

I tested Ulysses groups method  in around 3k live spins on SmartLive and  its very volatile. In one session 6 loses in a row. But sometimes you get nice winning streaks.  Maybe you have better luck in your casino.

Regards

[TwoCatSam]

Proofreader2k

My apologies!  I will change the post if I can.

I thought you posted it as a tribute to Uly; did not know you wrote it.  Thought he did.

The gist is--it seems to work well for me and I thank you for it.

TwoCat

EDIT:  Everyone go back and read post one.  Try these numbers.  You might be surprised. 

[Robeenhuut]

Proofreader2k

My apologies!  I will change the post if I can.

I thought you posted it as a tribute to Uly; did not know you wrote it.  Thought he did.

The gist is--it seems to work well for me and I thank you for it.

TwoCat

EDIT:  Everyone go back and read post one.  Try these numbers.  You might be surprised. 

Hello

I was surprised Sam. It was better than i suspected but only because  i suspected much worse results. But still not good enough.  Show me your numbers and i will show you mine. Barely breaking even or whatever. Just accept the numbers.  I can email you data.

Regards

[jrhelp007]

Hi Robeenhuut,

I agree with you the system is not doing great, leads to losses.

Two cat if you won, you went on a ladies luck site for that day.

John

[Robeenhuut]

Hi Robeenhuut,

I agree with you the system is not doing great, leads to losses.

Two cat if you won, you went on a ladies luck site for that day.

John

It has some merit but in a long run it leads 2 loses. In my testing on 185 spin sessions on Smartlive live and air ball it had wild swings from +184 2 -165 units generated in one session with general downward trend.
Its one of the systems that defies a logic but produces better than average results but they are not consistent enough to consider it a keeper.
I generally dont like systems based on "what happened in d past" premise but im willing always to at least test them.  I understand that from original posts that it might work by applying trend analyzing factors but they are 2 vague 4 me at this time.

Regards

[Robeenhuut]

-