Your Opinion Please......

[Mr J]

I play alot at DublinBet (practice money). I only play a two number method and YES OF COURSE, I am doing quite well. Come on, its one zero, who cant win? (lol)

As some know, there is table #1 and table #2. What I do......after a win, I then switch to the OTHER table and start over fresh. After that win, I switch back again etc.


My question.....do you consider that a FAIR assessment of a method OR its more impressive if I only play at the SAME table/wheel?

Ken

[Mr J]

Let me add this in as well. I keep a close eye on all my testing. Playing my method on only one of the wheels, I get pretty good results over hundreds of trials.

Take the SAME method and switch back and fourth, back and fourth after every win and I get MUCH BETTER results over hundreds of trials......same method mind you. A coincidence? I just dont know.


Ken

[schoenpoetser]

You write you play a two number method but you don`t explain your method.How can I give a opinion?

[Mr J]

The advice I'm looking for has nothing to do with........if the method is good or if it sucks.

I'm asking, do you find it odd (or only a coincidence) that a method (any method) gets better results constantly switching between TWO different tables? For some reason, I have better results. I said it at VLS2, I really wish the U.S. laws here were different, I need DublinBet. Single zero wheel? This s**t is too damn easy.   

Ken

[schoenpoetser]

From mathematical view the sum of a random row from two tables stay a random row. The sum of two special samples from one table or more is not a random row. This is the basic of my theory to beat the roulette by a strategy. All the chances have separate random rows. Every random row has his own strategy.

[telden]

it depends on how you are playing.  I think it might make the difference

[ReDsQuaD]

The advice I'm looking for has nothing to do with........if the method is good or if it sucks.

I'm asking, do you find it odd (or only a coincidence) that a method (any method) gets better results constantly switching between TWO different tables? For some reason, I have better results. I said it at VLS2, I really wish the U.S. laws here were different, I need DublinBet. Single zero wheel? This s**t is too damn easy.  

Ken

Sorry Ken but why would switching between tables help you win? At the end of the day a winning method should not and wont rely on switching tables. That simply has no logic and makes no sense.

I mean do people actually think switching tables is cheating the law of what ever you call it and will make them win?

If anyone shares this view, then they are simply looking at roulette from a completely different aspect. Which is the WRONG aspect and you wont beat the game that way.

[Mr J]

"Sorry Ken but why would switching between tables help you win?" >>> I'm not saying I'm right, only looking for your views AND I am only speaking for DublinBet. Yesterday, the  testing continued. Playing a 'certain' 2 number method, I finished GOOD playing at one table. Now today, same method but switching back and fourth after a win. VERY good results. Coincidence? I do not know.

Also, I kept track of spins on both days to make it fair.........380 spins, each day.

Ken

[ReDsQuaD]

I respect you Ken because you have been in this world longer than me and of course roulette forums. I am not trying to piss in your pool but it is 100% a coincidence.

[Mr J]

Thats fine, no wrong answers.

Thanks, Ken

[Mr J]

-