If you've been struggling to make sense
of the so-called Great Universal Theory
which wankel - sorry, winkel - claims to
have spent (wasted?) five years perfecting
this is the answer.
I wrote this programme to prove that the
so-called Great Universal Theory is nothing
more than a flawed method of betting on
unhit numbers.
This programme took much less than five
years to write - in fact less than five hours.
[attachimg=#]
Available now in Members Download area.
What? No reply?
Aren't I lucky!
I'm not defending or lambasting the G.U.T. as I have spent some time trying to figure out whether it was solid. The fact is, I have to agree that it is just another theory based on betting unhit numbers. I know about unhit numbers as I have based several systems around the idea myself. One of the systems I came up which is an offspring of Diodoro's Ludomeccanica(MySystem1 on the freeadult website), outperforms the G.U.T. through and through, and is much simpler to apply. I did not bring this up though, for fear of a scathing reply from Winkel, who seems to honestly believe that his G.U.T. is actually the Holy Grail. While I agree that it is ingenious, it is not something that should have taken 5 years to develop as its premise is quite simplistic in nature. I developed a similiar system recently with inspiration from the G.U.T. It is a take on the G.U.T., but instead of number crossings, you bet on sector crossings using Kimo Li's matrix idea. Unfortunately, the same thing tends to happen that happens a lot when I test the G.U.T.; numbers continuously repeat for spin after spin and deplete your bankroll to the point that it would take hours of successful play to recover it. I'm not saying that couldn't happen, but the chances are you will have at least one more bad run before you stop playing. In a nutshell, the losses will outweigh the wins in the long run, making it a losing system. I think Winkel is a talented system designer, but I think he needs to keep looking, because the G.U.T. is not the Holy Grail.