I think I have come up with a winning method by accident.

[SpensX]

Hello ,
I think of this idea and i realy think that there is some potential.
The way that i tried is conected with LW strategy
I start to make a registry and bet 1-3-9 after two consecutive L
ex.   LLnolinkswwLLLw
or bet after a single W occure hunting for a  bunches of W
ex.   nolinkswLw(triger)LLw(bet here),again with prog. 1-3-9
Usual for a 100 spins I made 6-8 units
The losses are rare and in these cases i lost 13 units

Best regards

[Mr J]

I'll use columns as an example. In terms of STARTING OUT >>> why not wait until the same column has hit twice in a row, then start on the other two? At least its a starting point.    Ken

[bikemotorman]

HI GUYS,

SOUNDS GOOD TO ME, GO FOR IT.
IF WE WORK TOGETHER IT MIGHT BE A REAL PLUS.

STUART

[bikemotorman]

HEY GUYS I PLAYED THIS WAY TODAY.


I have been playing on Jbet, but what I am doing is crazy.

I have one browser open on Jbet.
And one browser open on Random.org, what I do is set the RNG to 1 thru 36, I then hit generate and the Random.org numbers from one thru 36 tell me what to play on Jbet.
I am playing two dozens at a time kind of like SOME OF YOU GUYS do.
Of course it is play money lol.
But so far it is RANDOM AGAINST RANDOM.
So the Rng is giving me my bet selection, and what dozens to play.
If the rng tells me to play dozen one I play the other two dozens, I am playing the reverse lol.

It is insane and seems to be working very very well lol.

STUART

HARD WORK NEVER COST ME A PENNY

[lucky_strike]

Hi bike and nice for you happy winnings.

LS

lol sorry for one thing do i did reply to this and assume you was talking about something eles so now i modify and change this reply

Cheers

[wiggy]

I played this real money and won $20 within 30 spins. Playing only last 2 dozens won / last 2 dozens lost ... repeating that all the way through... with a 1-3-9-27 prog.
after an L i start my prog.
if i encounter LLL... i wait for a W to hit then on the next L i finish off my progfression 9-27... looks good.

[VLSroulette]

Guys, I think your progressions are too explosive. Instead use the nature of the game, as it is usually cycles of concentration and dispersion trying to overcome maximum deviations with explosive progressions isn't the best way. No use in getting "your hitting time" (namely "concentration of hits") after depleting your bank.

Better use schemes like grinder's counter and the like rising after a win and flat betting the bad times (or not betting at all).

When I evaluate a system I always do it from the perspective of how does it handle losing streaks, does it cut it? does it expect the wheel won't go past XYZ consecutive losses? and precisely the systems which try to attack the "bell" of the gaussian distribution of hits and "let out" on the extremes + use slow progressions are the ones to keep an eye on.

My advice is to stop using explosive betting schemes and take out the "if I only had another step in my progression" to "I better use concentration of hits and patience to overcome the bad beats".

Regards,
Victor

[bikemotorman]

GOOD TO HEAR WIGGY.

I HOPE YOU DO WELL WITH IT.

I STILL CANT UNDERSTAND THE LLL WWW DEAL, I MUST BE STUPID OR I DONT KNOW.

WHAT DOLLAR UNITS ARE YOU USING.

STUART

[bikemotorman]

Guys, I think your progressions are too explosive. Instead use the nature of the game, as it is usually cycles of concentration and dispersion trying to overcome maximum deviations with explosive progressions isn't the best way. No use in getting "your hitting time" (namely "concentration of hits") after depleting your bank.

Better use schemes like grinder's counter and the like rising after a win and flat betting the bad times (or not betting at all).

When I evaluate a system I always do it from the perspective of how does it handle losing streaks, does it cut it? does it expect the wheel won't go past XYZ consecutive losses? and precisely the systems which try to attack the "bell" of the gaussian distribution of hits and "let out" on the extremes + use slow progressions are the ones to keep an eye on.

My advice is to stop using explosive betting schemes and take out the "if I only had another step in my progression" to "I better use concentration of hits and patience to overcome the bad beats".

Regards,
Victor

HI VICTOR YOU KNOW THE DEAL.

FLAT BETTING IS BETTER.

I WISH I COULD GET THE JIST OF WHAT YOU AND STEVE AND LANKY DO.

RIGHT NOW I AM WORKING ON A SCOOTER INVENTION OF MY DESIGN AND JUST CANT GET THIS ROULETTE STUFF CORRECT.

STUART

[bikemotorman]

HOW DO I GET RID OF THIS THREAD, I WANT TO START OVER WITH THIS THREAD SO I WANT TO DELETE AND PUT MORE UP TO DATE INFO.
MY SYSTEM HAS BEEN DOING WELL.

STUART

[Mr J]

Start a different thread calling it PART 2.   Ken

[Colin]

Yes MRJ has the answer PART 2 i think would be grand please do it we are looking foreward to it& good luck Colin

[hermes]

To play 2 dozens with flat betting is more than difficult! The 1-3-9-27 progression after Lw as a trigger should keep you for long time over water.  Bikemotorman Lw's are easy. It is all about virtual play until you see one w (w=win, L=loss). e.g. you see LLLw that means if you would play you would 3 times lose and one time win but only on the paper. After one paper win you start to bet for real expecting lot of nolinksnolinks. If they don't come you play again only on paper until you see another Lw to try win lot of nolinksnolinks again with some flat progression. The lw shows how is your strategy or system performing.
Hermes

[Mr J]

"It is all about virtual play" --- BINGO, I agree.  Ken

[wiggy]

This is a really solid system - really good for tracking LW's...

[wiggy]

-