VLS Roulette Forum

Roulette System Development & Testing => Testing Zone => Topic started by: MattyMattz on September 15, 2008, 08:35:58 PM

Title: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: MattyMattz on September 15, 2008, 08:35:58 PM
Okay, first test (system is posted here: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/full-systems/my-single-street-system/msg21236/#new (nolinks://vlsroulette.com/full-systems/my-single-street-system/msg21236/#new) )

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,wins,losses
1,183,227,-166,122,26,1
[/table]

So I bet 9 times, each time having 3 seperate progressions.  My one loss came on the 3rd progression (betting 3 streets).

Matt
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: MattyMattz on September 15, 2008, 09:03:36 PM
Second test wasn't as good:

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,wins,losses
1,183,227,-166,122,26,1
2,305,108,-481,-362,42,4
[/table]

4 losses in one session, with this progression, will obviously hurt.  2 of the losses were on step 3, while step 1 and 2 had a loss each.  I'm considering testing using only the first 2 steps... but I'll do more testing according to hammy's rules first, to give it a proper testing.

Until tomorrow,
Matt
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: MattyMattz on September 15, 2008, 09:07:17 PM
Quote from: mattymattz on September 15, 2008, 09:03:36 PM
Second test wasn't as good:

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,wins,losses
1,183,227,-166,122,26,1
2,305,108,-481,-362,42,4
[/table]

4 losses in one session, with this progression, will obviously hurt.  2 of the losses were on step 3, while step 1 and 2 had a loss each.  I'm considering testing using only the first 2 steps... but I'll do more testing according to hammy's rules first, to give it a proper testing.

Until tomorrow,
Matt


Quick note to point out... had a played the second session with only 2 steps, my high would have been 111 (3 units higher) and my low would have been -217 (264 units better)... interesting.  Also the first session wouldn't have lost, although my high would have been slightly lower.

Cheers,
Matt
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: MattyMattz on September 16, 2008, 10:45:25 AM
Hey, another test this morning,
results, again, weren't good. 

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,losses
3,500,127,-778,-581,6
[/table]

1st step lost twice, 2nd step lost once and 3rd step lost 3 times.  Also - when playing only the first and second step, low was -444 (334 units better) and end was -179.  High was +64.  There may be an opportunity to play this using an Lw registry, but I would still drop the 3rd step.  I did see 2 losses in a row this session, both were 3rd step losses.

Cheers
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: cps10 on September 16, 2008, 12:04:47 PM
Matt - do you mean 1st step being the 5ss and the 2nd step being 4ss?
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: MattyMattz on September 16, 2008, 12:35:46 PM
Quote from: cps10 on September 16, 2008, 12:04:47 PM
Matt - do you mean 1st step being the 5ss and the 2nd step being 4ss?

Yep.
I'm looking at lowering the progression a bit.  For example, the first step could be 1,1,2,3,6,10.  Win's would vary from +1 to +7 but the loss would only be -110, campared to -230.... I'll keep you posted.  I'm also thinking of betting 5 streets for a max of 5 spins, then removing my bets and waiting for one to hit, then continue with the progression (betting 4 streets) and using a higher progression... just playing around with ideas.

Matt
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: cps10 on September 16, 2008, 12:41:42 PM
It certainly deserves some looking around for sure.
Title: Re: Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed
Post by: hammy on December 01, 2009, 12:14:23 PM
Hey guys, I can save you a lot of time testing. This 'system' only works well if you always bet 6 ss every time and only play for 2 hits per session, then start over with tracking a new set of 6 ss. Believe me, I've played this way plenty.

cheers !