Hello,
What do you think, will the roulette be less unbeatable if there was no house edge or betting limits or both ?
I'd prefer no limits, thank you!
Bateman
No limits and a big bankroll.
Yes, it would be more beatable with no house edge, lol.
Quote from: Shorty link=topic=10767. msg69037#msg69037 date=1246501630
Yes, it would be more beatable with no house edge, lol.
I know that it would be
slightly more possible to beat but it isn't for sure that it would
be completely beatable in the long term for example. I mean, you still gotta overcome the nature of randomness, don't make it look like I asked an idiot's question. I'm sure , that if a casino offers a roulette table with no zero, but still with betting limits it (the house) will make profit again for sure !
yea no table limits that would do the trick ..... but that will never happen... :'(
so i guess me and my buddy still have to override the table limits ... ;)
but keep an eye on the pitboss ... else :punish:
cheerz
Most people would still lose because they re-bet their winnings till they are all gone. The house usually makes 3-4 times the edge in profits every day because of this.