Hello dear friends,
Just want to bring the debate on a 2-number bet selection.
Which one would be your bet of choice for a 2-number combo? (Yup I tried targetting a bet via the waker methodology, but at times it makes you fall asleep in between bets, so perhaps debating other 2-number bet ways could provide fruitful, and -of course- more dynamic).
Many thanks!
Yours,
Victor
Once in awhile I keep track of all the tables available at my casinos (4 - 8) and bet on the 0/00 pair at the last table not to have shown either of the pair. I've yet to lose, but I have only tried this three or four times. I picked 0/00 because of them being green and, therefore, easier to spot on the tote boards.
I also like playing the 17/20 pair when in a "hot" sector, but I usually add the 32 because I hate it when the ball lands between the 17/20.
Ron.
Anybody watching me play roulette will always see me make this two number bet. I don't play it exclusively as a system in and of itself, but I have tested it that way (with a progression) fairly successfully. How I play it, is as I'm playing any other system, and I see this particular event happen, I bet on it.
Here it is:
Anytime I see that only 2 different numbers have come out in 3 spins (4,4,6 or 4,6,4 or 6,4,4 for example) I bet on those two numbers (in the previous example I'd bet on 6 and 4). You'd be amazed at how often only 2 different numbers appear in four spins...check it out.
OUT:
7 = play 17.27
17 = play 7.27
27 = play 17.7
10 = play 20.30
20 = play 10.30
30 = play 10.20
11 = play 22.33
22 = play 11.33
33 = play 11.22
There You go!
Cheers
/Compa
Hi victor,
I would play this as my 2 number bet.
13
(9)
18
(31)
12
(27)
26
(12)
29
32
9
8
3
30
33
9
14
1
34
18 I would now bet next 9 and 31
0 no bet as I have no data
26 I would now bet 27 and 12 next
...
regards,
mattjono
Thanks for your sharing you dear friends.
I am thinking in betting 2 numbers with a 100-unit bank this weekend.
My target is 20 units. Proportionally 5 to 1 (I want to win 1 before the casino takes 5).
Any other insight on a 2-number bet is welcome.
Kind regards.
Your friend,
Victor
Any two numbers that has hit twice. Play those two.
Cheers
Jakk
Quote from: MATTJONO on July 17, 2009, 07:14:13 AM
Hi victor,
I would play this as my 2 number bet.
13
(9)
18
(31)
12
(27)
26
(12)
29
32
9
8
3
30
33
9
14
1
34
18 I would now bet next 9 and 31
0 no bet as I have no data
26 I would now bet 27 and 12 next
...
regards,
mattjono
Hi Mattjono .. this is similar to the Markov-Chain ,i work on right now ... interresting !!!
u see often that in a game of roulette that serveral number combinations tend to hit more then once...
quick example
4
9
3
14
5
31
0
18
34
22
22
29 x
23 x
11 x
5 14,31
5 14,31,
28 x
34 18,22
33 x
26 x
23 19,11,
11 23,5 w now on 128units (stop)
always a good first quick test :-\ as always
regards,
mattjono
@Jakkalsdraai >>> In response to your above post. This is a method I have had good results with........I tried this flat betting and in fairness, I did get ok results. My TWO number progression for this method is 1-50. All I'm doing is betting on two numbers that have two hits on them. We will be writing down every number. I always use a small 4x6 notebook. I make my rows. The TOP row is for the reds and the 0. The BOTTOM row is for the blacks and the 00. To start, I need a few numbers, around 25. (remember, 2 numbers will be bet on every spin) For the top row, I scan for the most current number that has two hits on it AND from the bottom row.....same rule. I now have my 2 numbers I will bet....... I lose, write down the number just hit and repeat the process. Some numbers bet will be the same as the previous spin, thats the norm. Its simple and to the point. I have had very good profits from this. Ken
@Vic >>> Another way I play but using the "wait for it to hit" routine. Track all numbers. Find the two furthest back on the wheel NEXT TO EACH other. Wait for any of the two numbers to hit. Once it does, start long progression on the two. The ole argument (which I like BTW) the SAME two numbers side by side, as sleepers back to back?? Ken
Quote from: Mr J on August 13, 2009, 09:13:04 PM
@Vic >>> Another way I play but using the "wait for it to hit" routine. Track all numbers. Find the two furthest back on the wheel NEXT TO EACH other. Wait for any of the two numbers to hit. Once it does, start long progression on the two. The ole argument (which I like BTW) the SAME two numbers side by side, as sleepers back to back?? Ken
Thanks for the tip my mate. :clapping: Appreciated :thumbsup:
Victor
It's something I have looked at over the past 5 years off and on, but have made no real progress. Usually over such a period of time
I would have expected to have made some headway, but alas it's got me stumped :(
Mr Chips
Richard,
I've been brainstorming on a money management for a 100-unit bank on which you either reinvest all the wins looking for a 50% (or more) return OR reinvest 50% of all wins, until it breaks, and then whatever you get locked-in by your 50% becomes the net for the session (taking perhaps the last 5 inflated units too).
I am looking for a 1 or max. 2-number selection for it, why? Because it my belief such a scheme wouldn't make it on a regular low 2 to 1 payout or the like. It needs to be explosive.
Find the highest repeater in a 12 or 24 spin series and bet the neighbor on each side. Cheers! :thumbsup:
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on August 14, 2009, 04:14:48 PM
Find the highest repeater in a 12 or 24 spin series and bet the neighbor on each side. Cheers! :thumbsup:
This one sounds fair dear Proof.
I guess it has to be a "spin window" type of system, where you always look for the latest 12/24 spins, removing the latest and entering the newest into the window to compare data... :)
Thanks for the suggestion.
Hello Mr. Victor
The numbers selection would be for look hotter and its neighbors to play at the disc.
It often comes close to the hot numerical figure of the night, then you win.
Greetings.
WannaWin