Dear all,
I just joined this community and this is my first post here.
I was wondering if anyone here could help me code my simple scalping RX 2. 0 system.
There are 2 parts to this system:
User can select to activate EITHER part of the system or BOTH.
First, user input base unit(BU) bet in dialogue box. e. g, 1 or 2 or 5, etc
Part 1: (1st 12, 2nd 12, 3rd 12)
Start with placing a base unit on all "1st dozen', "2nd dozen" and "3 rd dozen" simultaneously.
For continuous losing bet on any dozen, increase bet progressively according to user input base multiplication factor
(create up to 10 input boxes for multiplication factor but user can choose to input less)
e. g, bet base unit=1, user input =1x1, user input=2x1, 2x1, 3x1 , 4x1, 6x1, 8x1 , 10x1
(in this case, I have input progressive bet limited to only 8 boxes)
[*In the case that the single european style ZERO appears during this particular progression, ignore it.
i. e. do not consider it a 'loss' bet, and continue progression as per normal. ]
If the last input bet, in this case 10x1, is a losing bet, DO NOT place any more bet in that 'dozen' until a winner first appears, then restart betting from base unit as per normal.
For the 'winning dozen' of the 3 dozens, place fixed progressive bets if it continuously win on that particular 'dozen' until the first loss.
i. e. win base unit, place 1 x BU again, 2x BU, 3xBU, 4xBU, 5xBU, 6xBU, 7xBU. . . . (i. e. +1 to multiplication factor), . . . loss
Then start from base unit again.
[*In the case that the single european style ZERO appears during this particular progression, DO NOT ignore it.
i. e. consider it a 'loss' bet, and start from base unit again]
Part 2: ( 1to18, even, red , black, odd , 19to36)
User input no. of times of non-appearance for any of the above layouts before bets begin. e. g, X=5 in box
Start with placing a base unit on the layout with that had no appearance for X times.
Continue betting a base-unit until you lose 2 consecutive bets in a row. Then, increase next bet to '2 x base unit' and continue with '2 x base unit' until there are 2 consecutive losses or 2 consecutive winners in a row.
If it is 2 winners in a row, then stop and wait for the next X non-appearance to start "2 up-2down" system on that particular layout again.
If it is 2 losses in a row, DO NOT place any more bet on that particular layout until a first winner appears, then wait for the next X non-appearance to start "2 up, 2 down" system from scratch again. (there is no increase to 3 x base unit and beyond to limit risk)
[*In the case that the single european style ZERO appears during this particular progression, ignore it.
i. e. do not consider it a 'loss' bet, just follow the "2up-2down" rules above accordingly]
Please feel free to ask any questions before starting to code and after.
Thanks,
Scalpmaster :)
Hello There Scalpmaster. Welcome to the forum and thanks for sharing your scalping system with us.
Perhaps our "RX coder at large" Rob Eaton (rjeaton1) has some time to devote to this. :thumbsup:
Kind regards.
Victor
I sure can go ahead and give this a shot for you Scalpmaster, I just need a bit more clarification. Could you perhaps give me a "spin by spin" example of your system in action?
Thank you both for replying. I have described in details the different limited progressions for all the layouts under different conditions. Please read through and let me know if you have any questions.
If you could give me a "spin by spin" example, that would be very helpful. What I mean is
Spin 1: 27 (what does your system do?)
Spin 2: 14 (what does your system do?)
Spin 3: 19 (what does your system do?)
So on and so forth until each part of your system has been "played out". This helps me to make sure no errors are made when coding the system for you.
The list for spin by spin examples would be too long as there are so many possible combinations.
(which is the whole point of programming it anyway)
Just code according to the rules to your best understanding and we can debug any errors along the way.
No coder wants to try?
Quote from: scalpmaster link=topic=12091. msg77116#msg77116 date=1252524267
No coder wants to try?
Have anyone tried the system? It works for lower sample sizes . i. e. hundreds
By automating/coding it, we can find out if it works beyond 1K spins. . .