Sometimes I start to feel tired going to the effort of posting a system and either getting shot down or no response so I will just post my results and if you want to know the system, then ask me,
Jish
END RESULT: +2013
SESSIONS: 51
WIN LOSS SPINS
84 42
500 217
224 217
148 30
279 10
13 14
118 81
69 3
500 98
53 28
500 203
140 31
196 20
78 16
102 4
224 8
168 19
56 41
118 30
167 30
167 32
28 52
196 20
78 15
78 45
32 167
252 9
14 48
140 31
78 15
22 27
130 107
500
195 7
181 32
134 5
83 80
111 43
500
83 29
102 4
500
500
224 8
78 16
167 32
134 5
13 14
102 4
202 134
252 9
END RESULT +1052
SESSIONS 21
Jish
WIN LOSS SPINS
102 4
75 179
195 7
223 21
500
500
35 53
252 9
35 1
259 21
500 98
24 129
196 20
78 16
223 21
167 32
13 14
119 43
84 42
223 21
249 22
I will post more results later, and note these are true results I have not hidden any results or doctored them, the only results not published are my test results because I did no record them but they are relatively the same
Jish
Well, Jish, I can't read your chart. What's the 500 I see several times?
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on December 19, 2009, 01:40:14 AM
Well, Jish, I can't read your chart. What's the 500 I see several times?
Sam
Its in the format of win/loss/spins, so the 500's are losses,
i will take care to post new charts in a more readable fassion
Looking at the results I find it interesting that 6 of the 10 losses are grouped either together or 1 session apart. Interesting with such a large session win % that the grouping of losses would appear so tightly.
OK, here is my new chart ive tried my best but I cant get them all to line up
END RESULT +4640
SESSIONS: 100
*NOTES- take notice of the spins I will highlight the good in green the bad in red, sometimes you have to work hard for a little profit, sometimes not hard for a big profit*
Jish
WIN LOSS SPINS
112 0 30
165 0 6
83 0 29
51 0 142
84 0 42
78 0 16
102 0 4
25 0 65
0 500 0
109 0 17
112 0 30
139 0 18
140 0 31
140 0 31
131 0 133
249 0 22
0 500 0
35 0 1
22 0 27
139 0 18
101 0 68
279 0 10
78 0 16
193 0 33
83 0 29
0 500 0
249 0 22
0 500 0
0 500 0
249 0 22
166 0 96
48 0 15
7 0 103
305 0 11
46 0 15
35 0 1
84 0 42
252 0 9
46 0 15
53 0 28
22 0 27
109 0 17
35 0 1
134 0 5
165 0 57
134 0 5
91 0 29
134 0 5
35 0 40
246 0 60
55 0 54
35 0 1
165 0 6
109 0 17
13 0 14
193 0 33
305 0 11
195 0 7
81 0 55
62 0 155
91 0 42
0 500 0
249 0 22
0 500 0
82 0 66
169 0 19
36 0 40
305 0 11
249 0 22
134 0 56
167 0 32
35 0 1
0 500 0
60 0 67
134 0 5
284 0 61
223 0 21
109 0 17
223 0 21
224 0 8
0 500 0
46 0 15
0 500 0
53 0 297
124 0 56
120 0 42
168 0 19
0 500 0
195 0 7
249 0 22
1 0 39
35 0 1
27 0 40
0 500 0
56 0 41
53 0 28
46 0 15
84 0 42
53 0 28
48 0 15
Quote from: Innovcon on December 19, 2009, 03:08:59 AM
Looking at the results I find it interesting that 6 of the 10 losses are grouped either together or 1 session apart. Interesting with such a large session win % that the grouping of losses would appear so tightly.
Yes and it was similar for the next 100 sessions too Innovcon.
OK!
END RESULT +2047
SESSIONS 110
*NOTES- the system fluxuated right untill near the end where it zoomed up 2000 units in about 20-30 sessions, before then it stayed roughly even, as you can see losses played a big part*
Jish
WIN LOSS SPINS
134 0 19
145 0 11
27 0 59
193 500 0
0 500 0
305 0 30
0 0 9
304 0 116
27 0 5
83 0 66
279 500 0
69 500 0
0 0 5
305 0 183
279 0 20
109 500 0
0 0 7
13 0 21
16 500 0
0 0 9
69 500 0
196 500 0
13 0 43
139 0 27
0 500 0
134 500 0
69 0 3
78 0 26
35 0 5
137 0 107
143 0 40
94 0 33
165 500 0
0 0 11
13 500 0
83 0 11
1 0 40
55 0 29
27 0 10
27 0 3
168 500 0
46 0 11
0 0 10
28 0 17
0 500 0
69 0 102
168 0 180
0 500 0
112 0 3
64 0 20
279 0 14
55 0 18
224 500 0
13 0 5
0 0 3
13 0 16
252 0 2
75 0 44
223 0 5
56 0 118
69 0 6
196 500 0
168 0 14
13 0 92
168 0 39
25 0 54
22 0 40
0 0 115
194 0 19
0 0 15
0 500 0
108 0 53
36 0 52
134 0 5
148 0 120
140 0 31
121 0 94
165 0 6
305 0 11
165 0 6
0 500 0
105 0 55
279 0 10
63 0 54
165 0 6
109 0 17
0 500 0
0 500 0
134 0 5
27 0 40
252 0 9
3 0 39
193 0 33
0 500 0
102 0 4
252 0 9
0 500 0
200 0 58
305 0 11
252 0 9
81 0 55
140 0 31
139 0 95
139 0 18
120 0 42
35 0 2
225 0 72
124 0 30
220 0 59
69 0 3
26 0 26
So I guess some of you want details now, first of all this system DOES NOT win all the time, why?
because it was betting on 1 single number and when that number sleeps that is when you get your losses,
most of the time the loss is where the number has slept for 60-120 spins
So what can we do about that? well we can only play hot numbers and this greatly increases our chances of winning and decreases our chances of losing
So my question to thise of you out there is how do you locate a hot number?
because as soon as a number sleeps the losses pour in, and often it can sleep for 2 sessions, sometimes 3 resulting in a 1000/1500 loss, this would explain why the losses seem to be clustered
So since we are all a family we should work together and see if this would work or not
BTW I was down 1500 units after 70 sessions when the number chose to sleep, and sleep, and sleep
ill post that below
Jish
Jish
Learn to use the "table" feature. Here is the format:
[table+,]
HEADING,,,,,HEADING,,,,,HEADING
1,,,,,2,,,,,3
[/table]
The + is an = sign...........
Sorry, we used to have an escape feature that let me show you, but no more. If you aren't clear, PM me and I'll PM it to you.
You may place as many commas as you want between your headings and your columns, just always use the same number to get it to line up. This is what it will look like:
[table=,]
HEADING,,,,,HEADING,,,,,HEADING
1,,,,,2,,,,,3
[/table]
Sam
did you keep your numbers jish. can you put them up also. might see how your system was played out. looks tasty.
How do you know that number will wake up soooooooooooooon? It is impossible. Number can sleep for 500 spins or even longer. To play winners is much easier.
You recognize winners by repeaters.
We could use 2 strategies see which one is better:
a/ write down 24 spins and choose only numbers which repeat 2 times.
b/ write down 30 spins and take only numbers which repeats 3 times.
Bet it flat for 60 spins.
Test it you will be surprised!
Hermes
Jish please remind ne what is the staking plan for your system Tks Colin
Hi jish..looks like sleepers a problem eh? come up with any tracking strategy for them? studyin cold numbers i'm getting a avg of 4 sleepers out of every 38 spins(00wheel) that carrys over better than 2 cycles.sleepers are part of the game..and are continuous per sessions..maybe knowing what sleepers from a previous cycle of say 37 spins may help reduce betting on them and can get a profit before a new group of sleepers start forming in the session u are playing in? or go with Scooby Doo's observations of numbers repeating or hitting close to the previous six spins for a hot number strategy?
Quote from: hermes on December 19, 2009, 11:35:23 PM
How do you know that number will wake up soooooooooooooon? It is impossible. Number can sleep for 500 spins or even longer. To play winners is much easier.
You recognize winners by repeaters.
We could use 2 strategies see which one is better:
a/ write down 24 spins and choose only numbers which repeat 2 times.
b/ write down 30 spins and take only numbers which repeats 3 times.
Bet it flat for 60 spins.
Test it you will be surprised!
Hermes
Thanks hermes, i will try a test with both of these stratergies over 100 sessions and i will post the results for all to see, then ill post the system so everyone can test it and we will see the true results
Jish
I spent about 20 minutes writing up that table business so you could keep your columns straight. Don't you think you could at least muster up a "Thanks!"?
It is not good when one member helps another and is ignored for it. It demeans the forum and the spirit in which it was founded. People who know things will just decide it isn't worth their time.
Sarcastic answers to logical questions is one more nail in the coffin.
Sam
Hey Sam - I couldn't agree with you more. But as a member of the slient majority let me say that you are a star on this forum. There is a vast audience out there who values and appreciates all you do.
Hi Sam perhaps i am being more stupid than ever but can you tell me how this oerson Jish was playing the system does he bet 1 then 2 then 3 etc. that i would like 2 know .A very merry Christmass and grand New Year 2 all on board Cheers Colin
17Black
Thanks for that. Haven't seen you about in a while.
Colin
I stopped with the first post. Don't know what he's doing.
Sam
Quote from: Jish on December 19, 2009, 12:59:38 AM
Sometimes I start to feel tired going to the effort of posting a system and either getting shot down
There's definitely a lot of that. Why would anyone rubbish a system without providing evidence ( say, Rxtreme 10,000 spin model and graph )?
Jeromin
Sam thanks for your help .Perhaps he will let every know bt xmas .Sam Happy Christmas & a good and winning New Year . Keep 'er Lit .Colin
Quote from: TwoCatSam on December 20, 2009, 11:43:00 AM
Jish
I spent about 20 minutes writing up that table business so you could keep your columns straight. Don't you think you could at least muster up a "Thanks!"?
It is not good when one member helps another and is ignored for it. It demeans the forum and the spirit in which it was founded. People who know things will just decide it isn't worth their time.
Sarcastic answers to logical questions is one more nail in the coffin.
Sam
Sorry Sam i have been very very busy with work and have barely had time to myself, don't get the impression I am ignoring you i just simply haven't made any columns yet, you could have been sure i would have thanked you next time that I posted one, apologise for coming across as aggrogent or ignorant i really do appreciate your help and effort, I totaly agree with ou that it demeans the forum for I myself have the same feelings when i perform similar guestures, apologies,
Jish
Jish
We're good! Thanks.
Sam
Sam old boy,
She is very nice,your new avatar.Keep them going mate,
as am taking all down.................................Iboba
Quote from: iboba on December 23, 2009, 03:42:10 PM
Sam old boy,
She is very nice,your new avatar.Keep them going mate,
as am taking all down.................................Iboba
She>? is very nice iboba?
Quote from: Jeromin on December 21, 2009, 01:42:55 PM
There's definitely a lot of that. Why would anyone rubbish a system without providing evidence ( say, Rxtreme 10,000 spin model and graph )?
Jeromin
you see mate for this system RX offers no assistance because it is played in sessions not continuous spins, you wouldnt think it makes a difference bit it really does, the real thing that will determine it is playing for real money. Fullstop.