This system failed within 3000 RNG spins but passed 800,000 REAL WHEEL spins go figure!
And you got 800,000 real spins from where? Ken
downloads section of this forum dude :D
I'm not your dude, I was only asking. Ken
this system win over 800 000 spins on real wheel....loool why you told here when you even dont show system orr what ever is it caled the same like junk email
Quote from: Mr J on January 23, 2010, 11:15:28 AM
I'm not your dude, I was only asking. Ken
you can be my dude, i give you permission ::)
And one more piece of shit on the board....GGRREEAATT. :thumbsup: Ken
Quote from: Bo0Merang on January 23, 2010, 11:17:53 AM
this system win over 800 000 spins on real wheel....loool why you told here when you even dont show system
orr what ever is it caled the same like junk email
lol boomerang im 100% willing to show the system I dont care who sees it for most of you wont validate it anyway because its a progression, its not junk email I will give you the 800,000 spins and the system to test for yourself
Quote from: Mr J on January 23, 2010, 11:21:21 AM
And one more piece of s**t on the board....GGRREEAATT. :thumbsup: Ken
lol cmon ken dont you have a sense of humour. I intend no offence so dont be so fkn rude
Ok...understood. :give_rose:
Hi Jish, please do post it ;)
Quote from: Jish on January 23, 2010, 11:21:57 AM
lol boomerang im 100% willing to show the system I dont care who sees it for most of you wont validate it anyway because its a progression, its not junk email I will give you the 800,000 spins and the system to test for yourself
lool apreciated but i have my own system and is caled randomnes dont have memory whats that mean ?? its mean whe you waiting for any diferent decision form any playng chances dont wait just bet the same becouse thats the probabylity of roulette:)not everytime but 90 percent tim e yes i use sometime progression as well but tooo small for my needs )) im happy that you will post it for other members and ofcourse im curious no worry :)mate :yahoo:
I saw the oppertunity in analysing data, its a wait for x then bet progression system,
on thirds
5 step progression
wait for 8 spins of the same 3rd
done.
I guess you could do the same with EC, streets & double street...find the worst possible outcome and count back from it the steps in your progression
Quote from: Jish on January 24, 2010, 10:21:40 AM
I saw the oppertunity in analysing data, its a wait for x then bet progression system,
on thirds
5 step progression
wait for 8 spins of the same 3rd
done.
Jish............still dun understand wat u mean???????? :nono:
Quote from: Jish on January 24, 2010, 10:21:40 AM
I saw the oppertunity in analysing data, its a wait for x then bet progression system,
on thirds
5 step progression
wait for 8 spins of the same 3rd
done.
wait 4 x then progression ??? put on plate if you can pls:)
Wait for a dozen to appear 8 times in a row then bet with a 5 step progression 1,3,9,27,81 on the other two dozens- some make it 6 step progression- this is an old system, most people that play wait for 5 it has a reasonably high win rate but loses bad when loses
Or just keep it simple , if the same dozen has hit 4 times in a row just play a 1 3 9 progression on the other 2 dozens.
Quote from: t0p_man on January 25, 2010, 09:55:08 AM
Title very misleading.
You should be betting 800,000 times and still stay positive.
Not waiting 100,000spins and bet once. So, total you bet 8 times. ;D
Than k you for clearing it out )) exactly how you said
Quote from: Jish on January 25, 2010, 08:04:55 AM
Wait for a dozen to appear 8 times in a row then bet with a 5 step progression 1,3,9,27,81 on the other two dozens- some make it 6 step progression- this is an old system, most people that play wait for 5 it has a reasonably high win rate but loses bad when loses
WHAT IS wrong with your head 6 to 8 hit one dozen you have under 300 spins maybe 2 times, now if i kalkulate well then you need sleep in cashino to get some winnings....what about follow all double hits ?? i apreciate that you like joking with us :haha: :haha: :haha: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Bo0Merang on January 25, 2010, 10:17:21 AM
WHAT IS wrong with your head 6 to 8 hit one dozen you have under 300 spins maybe 2 times, now if I kalkulate well then you need sleep in cashino to get some winnings....what about follow all double hits ?? I apreciate that you like joking with us :haha: :haha: :haha: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Mr Bo0merang, i would think of this more like a system that when you are playing YOUR system at the tables if you happen to stumble accross 8 of the same dozen, have a flutter.....Now i know why so many people get pissed off on this forum its because everybody is soooo happy to jump in and critisize anything they can! :aggressive:
Quote from: Jish on January 26, 2010, 08:44:28 AM
Mr Bo0merang, I would think of this more like a system that when you are playing YOUR system at the tables if you happen to stumble accross 8 of the same dozen, have a flutter.....Now I know why so many people get pissed off on this forum its because everybody is soooo happy to jump in and critisize anything they can! :aggressive:
Absolutely. I am working on the last two dozens/last two columns system, with 90 minute 60 spin sessions. Any extra oddity I can cash on is greatly appreciated. Thanks Jish and keep it up. I wonder how many people in this forum actually risk their cash in a casino...
Jeromin and Jish lets look some spins>>> when i play my system ??? my system is disained exactly about trends ,its mean that i spend more time on tables then you sleeping my mates /flutter with 8 hits on dozens ??? you must be wrong i told ya between 150 spins you will find one orr max 2 times 5 times one dozen now if you kalkulate and read well you need 500 spins to get some win becouse im counting as well progression MEAN your progression so now wake up and dont make with me around !!!!!!! 500 spins= more then 5 hour if you play profesionaly you sleep in casino other way you play one time weekly and you have just luck for cupling trends!! So i thing you play a littlebit diferent if you change some number i will believe you... is that clear now ?? hope so yes
Jishi, don't be so shy reveal the holy grail to us god's believers. Forget the losers.
Cheers Hermes
:angel:
Hermes
There is nothing holy on playing the dozens. It so simple that you would not believe it.
With any progression you will win. The dozens is to be played like this.
1. Budget the winnings you need for the session. The time to stop for the session.
2. If the dealer change in the session complete the session.
3. Last two dozens spun. Not only the last two spins - the last two dozens. Let say Dozen 1 and 2 play the both if the - 3 / third hit replay 1 and 2 with the progression. If the 3 hit again play THEN 3 and the dozen that hit before the third dozen hit.
IF you think that this is not working look at how the sequence need to be to take you out. If you start to play 1 and 2 for two times to be out. The last Dozen before play is dozen 2 and before this 1.
33112233112233.....
Can you see it is not so easy to make you lose.
Yesterdays 13323113311232122213321232121223131132311313312211232131.
Hope it helps
TCD
This is a joke and sorry for saying it and being cruel.
The chart is set to 5000 and end at +500 in 800 000 trails, 5.500.
Next time you use RX put the settings at 0 and you will get an clear view of what your results are.
And how many bets did you place in 800 000 = 1024 -lol-
LS
it was not intended as a sit down and play system, as said above if your playing your system and you happen to strike 8 of the same dozen have a bet, why is everyone so uptight on this forum? Im giving you information on how to win and all you want to do is pick at it and try to prove it to be wrong
NO ONE IS TIGHT it is just WHEN happend strike of 8ts i think it is not every day atleast one time per 6 hours?? thats maybe to much ok you get me 8 on row 1 time per3 hours ?? yap this can be )) to be honest i use very small progresion from 3 to 5 strikes the others where is SIX AND MORE DOZENS i have usualy chips stright on that dozen from beginning but i think it is just beginner luck you know...
Be careful, you can grow easily beard till you get 8 dozens in row! But to divide the time in two you can do the same on columns. On ECs you would have to wait at least 10 in row, even that is not enough.
You can play last 2 dozens after you would virtually lose 3 times (use the LLL as trigger to bet). I didn't saw more that 6 losses in row! Apply flat progression (like Fibonacci).That's a good one, almost holy.
Hermes
Quote from: hermes on January 29, 2010, 10:28:16 PM
Be careful, you can grow easily beard till you get 8 dozens in row! But to divide the time in two you can do the same on columns. On ECs you would have to wait at least 10 in row, even that is not enough.
You can play last 2 dozens after you would virtually lose 3 times (use the LLL as trigger to bet). I didn't saw more that 6 losses in row! Apply flat progression (like Fibonacci).That's a good one, almost holy.
Hermes
Fibonacci failed
Why not create many of your own groups of 12 numbers? Keep track of all of your pre-made groups; like 10 combination's of 12 numbers. Then, you might find one of those groups that hit 8 in a row. You can now bet on the other numbers with progression of course. Heck, have 20 combination's. Your bound to find a group sooner or later.
Just a thought.
Quote from: keel44 on February 01, 2010, 03:51:05 AM
Why not create many of your own groups of 12 numbers? Keep track of all of your pre-made groups; like 10 combination's of 12 numbers. Then, you might find one of those groups that hit 8 in a row. You can now bet on the other numbers with progression of course. Heck, have 20 combination's. Your bound to find a group sooner or later.
Just a thought.
you might just be onto something keel, let me investigate
OK i made 45 combinations without any effort, there are lots more, If i programmed all of these into a bot and ran the spins through it ild be interested to find out what happens
the combinations are made out of the single streets, I was going to work out every combination but i cant be bothered now lol, 45 is surely enough to begin anyway
The next question, can i code.....nope :-\
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 5
1 2 3 6
1 2 3 7
1 2 3 8
1 2 3 9
1 2 3 10
1 2 3 11
1 2 3 12
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 6
2 3 4 7
2 3 4 8
2 3 4 9
2 3 4 10
2 3 4 11
2 3 4 12
3 4 5 6
3 4 5 7
3 4 5 8
3 4 5 9
3 4 5 10
3 4 5 11
3 4 5 12
4 5 6 7
4 5 6 8
4 5 6 9
4 5 6 10
4 5 6 11
4 5 6 12
5 6 7 8
5 6 7 9
5 6 7 10
5 6 7 11
5 6 7 12
6 7 8 9
6 7 8 10
6 7 8 11
6 7 8 12
7 8 9 10
7 8 9 11
7 8 9 12
8 9 10 11
8 9 10 12
9 10 11 12
Hello Jish, Keel44 and everybody.
Here attached you have a simple graphical excel sheet with the @keel modification to your original idea.
I've used the 45 "extended" sets of 12 numbers each.
Open and press F9, or load in column B your numbers. (Extent the formulas in the cells if you want a sample greater than than 100 spins)
I've set the "limit" in 6 consecutive hits as trigger.
It shall be represented in green in the columns.
If you didn't see a 7, it means that you hit at first.
If you do see a green 6 followed by a 7, or more in red... is just to show the steps on that particular progression until it stops to hit.
The most interesting thing that I've found is that you can find spins in which more than one set have the trigger in green simoultaneously.
It means that the set of streets against you play is reduced, and many time (if there his simoultaneity) you finish progressing against ONLY 18 numbers.
Just take a "visual" look, and see HOW MANY possibilities this model has.
Very, very good. Even thinking in less agresives progressions, because the hit rate on the 7 step looks very high.
In mean we finish having (simoultaneous or not) more than 5 times to see the trigger each 100 spins.
Thanks for sharing.
All the best.
Betatester.
PS: I've actualized the sheet because a minor mistake when 0 spuns.
Quote from: betatester on February 01, 2010, 08:24:11 AM
Hello Jish, Keel44 and everybody.
Here attached you have a simple graphical excel sheet with the @keel modification to your original idea.
I've used the 45 "extended" sets of 12 numbers each.
Open and press F9, or load in column B your numbers. (Extent the formulas in the cells if you want a sample greater than than 100 spins)
I've set the "limit" in 6 consecutive hits as trigger.
It shall be represented in green in the columns.
If you didn't see a 7, it means that you hit at first.
If you do see a green 6 followed by a 7, or more in red... is just to show the steps on that particular progression until it stops to hit.
The most interesting thing that I've found is that you can find spins in which more than one set have the trigger in green simoultaneously.
It means that the set of streets against you play is reduced, and many time (if there his simoultaneity) you finish progressing against ONLY 18 numbers.
Just take a "visual" look, and see HOW MANY possibilities this model has.
Very, very good. Even thinking in less agresives progressions, because the hit rate on the 7 step looks very high.
In mean we finish having (simoultaneous or not) more than 5 times to see the trigger each 100 spins.
Thanks for sharing.
All the best.
Betatester.
PS: I've actualized the sheet because a minor mistake when 0 spuns.
wow! I'm very impressed betatester, next step for me is to write down all the 12 number combinations the streets can make, surely there would be a pattern so i can write them faster ;) I never realised there were so many 12 number combinations in 37 numbers.
I saw the hit rate on 7 steps too, this MAYBE could be used with flat betting, but i will look into that later, thanks for your help i assume I just enter all the new combinations in the top cells and drag the formulas across?
Hello Jish.
There are 495 possibles sets of 12 elements taken 4 by 4.
But if you try to control all this sets it should be a mess.
First of all we must change the sheet and process it in different way, because there are ONLY 256 columns in excel.
I've tried transposing columns > rows, and it's a mess....
Each prediction afects too many sets.
@keel's sets are just one possibility.
But not the only btw all those 495.
If you take a look:
1 9
2 17
3 24
4 22
5 20
6 18
7 16
8 14
9 12
10 10
11 9
12 9
Those are the times that each group appairs in the sets....
#1 only 9 times... while #3 combines in 23 times.
It shall be a distribution in the chosen groups to make the combinations the most distributed as possible...
So we can find "n" sets but with an equal distribution, or apparences in the sets:
1: 15 times.
2: 15 times.
3: 15 times.
....
12: 15 times.
15 or 11 or another number, but covering the spread regulary.
I will take a look...
Thanks again.
Betatester.
I may have a way for tracking purposes. This may not be suitable for proper testing, but more than suitable for playing. What we want to look for is consecutive groups of 12 numbers other than the normal dozens and columns. Let us letter the 12 streets A - L. We will start tracking spins, and we will place the corresponding letter beside the number. We will count back until we get 4 different letters. We will watch and see when we get a few "like" combination's in a row. Here is a little example from an online casino:
number spun then corresponding street number:
9 - C
12 - D
12 - D
16 - F
2 - A (CDFA) --------- count back 4 different
12 - D (CDFA) ------ 6 in a row
20 - G (FADG)
36 - L (ADGL)
28 - J (DGLJ)
15 - E (GLJE)
32 - K (LJEK)
28 - J (LJEK)
31 - K (LJEK)
14 - E (LJEK)
28 - J (LJEK) -------------- 8 in a row here
6 - B (KEJB) -------------- streak broken
Yes, you have to look further than 4 back when you see the same 4 repeating, so you don't miss the numbers that started the streak in the first place. It is easy to train the eye. Just take it slow enough and remember 4 letters that's all.
Nice work so far guys. Thanks for your efforts.
Keel, all you would have to do is wait for 2 of the streets to repeat twice in 6 spins, there is your dozen ;)
Quote from: betatester on February 01, 2010, 05:35:32 PM
because there are ONLY 256 columns in excel
Im not sure which version you have, my columns just keep going and going and going?, ill be happy to finish imputting the data if you gave me a breif outline
PM sent
We are still looking for a lengthy set of 12 numbers, yes? Your thread started out saying wait for 8 or 9 of the same dozens to appear in a row. One cannot expect to really find any unless they stumble onto it. So I say lets form our own groups of 12 which gives us more opportunities. The 12 streets gives us many groupings. With my tracking idea I posted, you let the long streaks reveal themselves to you, and you build your group of 12 around that. My whole point is trying to find a long set of 12 "like" numbers more frequently and build a system around that concept.
I just did a quick 25 spins on an online casino to help illustrate my tracking:
Number Spun - Street Letter
1 - A
30 - J
1 - A
27 - I
14 - E (AJIE) ........5 IN A ROW HERE
10 - D (AIED)
7 - C (IEDC)
2 - A (EDCA)
14 - E (EDCA) ............5 IN A ROW HERE
23 - H (CAEH)
24 - H (CAEH)
23 - H (CAEH) .............6 IN A ROW HERE
34 - L (AEHL)
15 - E (AEHL) ............7 IN A ROW HERE
26 - I (EHLI) ..............7 IN A ROW HERE
28 - J (LEIJ)
12 - D (EIJD)
6 - B (IJDB)
12 - D (IJDB) ............5 IN A ROW HERE
35 - L (JDBL)
10 - D (JDBL)
12 - D (JDBL) ............7 IN A ROW HERE
26 - I (DBLI) .............7 IN A ROW HERE
2 - A (LDIA) .............6 IN A ROW HERE
33 - K (DIAK) ...........5 IN A ROW HERE PENDING
Every time I write "IN A ROW HERE" means that is where that group of 12 ended. They are all different groupings. In this example, every time it went to 7, the streak broke and a bet would have won. You see, we are starting to get opportunities from only 25 numbers tracked.
thanks for reading.
Yes Keel I agree with the way you bet on this, , any ideas on progressions anyone?
I think martingale is a no go but if it holds up, why not though, it seems they all fade away before max progression is reached anyway. In the initial test It never passed the 5th stage of a 7 stage progression meaning I could have waited for 6 instead of 8 but I chose to have 2 steps up my sleeve incase I needed them
conclusion to that is the maximum number of any dozen was 13 consecutive which happened a couple of times, considering there is only a 33% chance of hitting a dozen you wouldnt expect it to hit for more than 15 in major extreme cases
any Ideas on how to run a simulation of spins beta?
I have played for fun many times now using my tracking method. I find lots of 7, 8, 9's in a row in only about 60 spins. I have never came across a 10+, but I haven't played real long. I think the best way to play this, using my tracking idea of course, is to bet 1 unit on the 8 streets after 7 misses in a row. 3 units per the 8 streets after 9 misses in a row. 9 units per street after 11 misses in a row. That is all. Don't chase the real long one. You will suffer big time.
I am finding plenty of opportunities of 7. Obviously, if the streak ends after 8, you won't be on it, but so what. Another 7 in a row is right around the corner. I believe the hit rate is very good.
1 unit per 8 street after 7 misses in a row
3 units per 8 street after 9 misses in a row
9 units per 8 street after 11 misses in a row.......if lose STOP chasing
If the streak breaks while your not on it, wait for the next one
Give yourself a 200 unit bankroll
Quote from: keel44 on February 04, 2010, 03:04:29 AM
I have played for fun many times now using my tracking method. I find lots of 7, 8, 9's in a row in only about 60 spins. I have never came across a 10+, but I haven't played real long. I think the best way to play this, using my tracking idea of course, is to bet 1 unit on the 8 streets after 7 misses in a row. 3 units per the 8 streets after 9 misses in a row. 9 units per street after 11 misses in a row. That is all. Don't chase the real long one. You will suffer big time.
I am finding plenty of opportunities of 7. Obviously, if the streak ends after 8, you won't be on it, but so what. Another 7 in a row is right around the corner. I believe the hit rate is very good.
1 unit per 8 street after 7 misses in a row
3 units per 8 street after 9 misses in a row
9 units per 8 street after 11 misses in a row.......if lose STOP chasing
If the streak breaks while your not on it, wait for the next one
Give yourself a 200 unit bankroll
keel, my progression is 0.25c on each, then 1,3,9......maybe 27 and if im really really adventurous 81. The longest streak in my initial data was 13 in a row, but I think you are on the right track with abandoning because there are alot of 7's & 8's, i myself played with this system for 4 hours today the longest streak I got was +3, i think we need a simulation sometime
Quote from: Jish on February 04, 2010, 07:52:12 AM
keel, my progression is 0.25c on each, then 1,3,9......maybe 27 and if im really really adventurous 81. The longest streak in my initial data was 13 in a row, but I think you are on the right track with abandoning because there are alot of 7's & 8's, I myself played with this system for 4 hours today the longest streak I got was +3, I think we need a simulation sometime
What do you mean +3?
Quote from: keel44 on February 04, 2010, 03:12:22 PM
What do you mean +3?
Wait for 8, then 3rd step of progression
Hello Jish & keel.
Hello Forum.
I think that i didn't understand exactly what are you two doing.
Could you put in black over white. Please.
In the meanwhile, as i didn't understand how to select the 8 beatable streets with all this letters, i figure out a way to track your ideas.
I can easily set a excel sheet (controlling only one set of 12 numbers, the normal ones) and know in each spin, which were the 4 last spun streets.
Something like that:
Nº # Street L1 L2 L3 L4
1 0 0
2 13 5 0
3 1 1 5 0
4 5 2 1 5 0
5 5 2 2 1 5 0 (no 4 diff streets)
6 33 11 2 1 5 0 (no 4 diff streets)
7 35 12 11 2 1 5 +
8 35 12 12 11 2 1 - (1)
9 2 1 12 11 2 1 - (2)
10 33 11 1 12 11 2 - (3)
11 20 7 11 1 12 2 +
12 4 2 7 11 1 12 +
13 15 5 2 7 11 1 +
14 17 6 5 2 7 11 +
15 30 10 6 5 2 7 +
16 6 2 10 6 5 2 - (1)
17 32 11 2 10 6 5 +
18 16 6 11 2 10 6 - (1)
19 1 1 6 11 2 10 +
20 31 11 1 6 11 2 - (1)
21 28 10 11 1 6 2 +
22 25 9 10 11 1 6 +
23 3 1 9 10 11 1 - (1)
24 19 7 1 9 10 11 +
25 34 12 7 1 9 10 +
26 0 0 12 7 1 9 -
27 14 5 12 7 1 9 +
....
....
Then I can control if the actual street for the actual spin was in the last 4 spuned.
If I find that it was is a (-) sign. If not is a (+)
Then it suffices to keep tracking the size of each (negative) strike, and wait "how many times" it can reach (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or greater).
But i don't if this way is exactely as you do with the letters (hijk) ???
The last thing I've understand of your system is that you wait for "n" -I've signs (if this selection method fits your ideas), and then go with a progression.
You wrote:
"I am finding plenty of opportunities of 7. Obviously, if the streak ends after 8, you won't be on it, but so what. Another 7 in a row is right around the corner. I believe the hit rate is very good.
1 unit per 8 street after 7 misses in a row
3 units per 8 street after 9 misses in a row
9 units per 8 street after 11 (???) misses in a row.......if lose STOP chasing"
Here the data: (I'm using the same set as per another system in another thread, anyway...)
Those are the results for 14.637 spins
1 2258
2 722
3 263
4 101
5 38
6 10
7 2 <<
8 2 *
9 0 *
10 1 *
11 0
12 0
2 times you hit at first. +2 units
2 times in 2 step. + 2 units
0 times i 3third step. 0 units
You lost once your progression : -104 units.
That's a poor performance...
But i'think that you must explain if that way of selecting (non in the last 4 different streets spuned) is correct or you use antother approach.
Thanks a lot.
Betatester.
Your way of tracking is very much the same as my way of tracking. I find mine easier. You just use paper and pen with mine and track as you go. The letters just identify the street. Always count back the previous 4 different letters. I find more opportunities using this tracking method. 7, 8, 9 in a row are fairly common. 5 in a row happens a lot. Maybe the first leg of the progression should start with 5 in a row-----skip 1 -----then 7-----skip1------- then 9------ then 11
If the streak ends when your not on it. Wait for another.
OK betatester & keel,
in the real wheel data I have the maximum for 12 numbers was 12 consecutive spins, so in my opinion we have 2 options IF you were using a 5 step progression, you have the *max output* which is using the maximums from the test, or the *safety progression* which keeps 2 spare progressions up the sleeve, I will abreviate them as MO&SP
1 105002
2 33705
3 10822
4 3721>>MO step 1
5 1115
6 387>>MO step 2
7 134
8 36 >>>MO step 3
9 10
10 6>>>>MO step 4
11 2
12 1>>>>>MO step 5
1 105002
2 33705
3 10822
4 3721
5 1115
6 387
7 134
8 36 >>>MO step 1
9 10
10 6>>>>MO step 2
11 2
12 1>>>>>MO step 3
Just what do you do when it wins inbetween????????????, it looks like you are making countermeasures for something that will inevitably lose- that is why the idea was to wait for 8 because it DIDNT lose && I still had 2 steps left in my progression for anything out of the ordinary
Payed this, won won, won, won, won, won... hit a set of 15, GAME, SET, MATCH >:(
I did find a way to make this system win- just not the progression, if you can make the progression cost less and in 4 steps this will win, post here if you have ideas
1/3/9/27 = 39 per dozen so 78 for 2 dozens-
what i was working on was a big percentage of them were falling 6-9, not very many over this at all
my average was there was +9 bout 1 in 1000 spins
Quote from: Jish link=topic=14124. msg95269#msg95269 date=1265640175
Payed this, won won, won, won, won, won. . . hit a set of 15, GAME, SET, MATCH >:(
I´ve been playing a way where you go to a roulette table and record the last 10 numbers and cross off each street as it hits. Usually after about 10 numbers have hit you have covered 8 streets leaving you a dozen left. A 5 step progression could easily be set up for this. I only play though if I have covered 8 streets with 10 or more spins. Just what I´ve been doing, though not betting with real money, the problem with testing this is it takes a very long time to get reliable data without programming it.