Hi Steve.
I am interested in purchasing your computer. However, I would like to request that your computer be tested by an experienced party. I would like to request that Herb test your computer. Better yet, Laurance and Kelly as well... I wouldn't want Herb to curve fit the results, so two other indepent tests by experts should prevent this. Seeing as Herb is very knowledgable in roulette physics, statistics, and has many ways to test the computer and various conditions, I can see no better candidate. I'm sure such an endorsement would only be positive for sales.
P.S. I'm interested in hearing Herb's input. Can you please unblock his I.P.?
After reading the ad, I see you are no longer selling them. But you are allowing people to test them all they want before using them as a partner. I'd still like Herb to test one on my behalf, thanks.
You know, it would really be cool if Steve created a software application for his system, like Roulette Sniper--even better a bot that automatically played his system with a stop loss/win limit like Roulette Assault. Being VB in nature, I know creating a program in which the bets are made before ball release would be difficult--and it wouldn't have to be that good...if it made say $0.75-$1.00 and hour it still would be cool.
Davey, Steve has already asked if i wanted to do it, but i must say i have no interest in roulette computers at all. The interest is above systems but below AP without devices. Barnett is selling training kits and the performance is documented in the episode "take down" they showed lately on TV here in DK. Shown in the program, they had to do the job in 60 minutes because of battery limitation, but they managed to net 20K from "Bay something" Casino.
A proper statistical test on wheels with different degrees of tilt would also be extremely time consuming.
There are sometimes thoug, were i have thought that it might be a good theme for a good "get together" with laurance and snow where each of us were testing Steve/Forester/Barnetts computers on the same spins. Maybe 200 spins with tilt and 200 spins with a level wheel. But the test should actually also include different ball types which quickly would bring the total of spins up around 1000 or more.
The test would with this spin sample size still not be significant, but we would have put the "Rank ordrer" together, so b***hing could be put to an end. (Barnett not being part of that)
Still, a lot of effort with something of only little interest.
bump
It was already tested by Ronjo. If there is an experienced member in Melbourne Australia, I will meet them to show them personally. But again we already did testing with Ronjo. How many people need to test it? I'm not even selling the computers anymore - they are free for partners.
As for the system you said:
QuoteYou know, it would really be cool if Steve created a software application for his system, like Roulette Sniper--even better a bot that automatically played his system with a stop loss/win limit like Roulette Assault. Being VB in nature, I know creating a program in which the bets are made before ball release would be difficult--and it wouldn't have to be that good...if it made say $0.75-$1.00 and hour it still would be cool.
It is already done. By system has a lot of different software. VB is only part of what I teach anyway. With bets before ball release, bots can do it but application is only for the basic methods. My software developers are working on software for full CV application at the table, and analysis is done automatically on the fly. But I'm not selling the software - it's for partners.